Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 3280. (Read 26716790 times)

hero member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 755
Homo Sapiens Bitcoinerthalensis
YOU ARE ALL A BUNCH OF CUNTS !!!



Huh, &^$@$%^^&*%£%£@@%&!!!



Probably looking at a few lifetimes of jail here.
If only I was Japanese … not that those WEF cucks will leave it at that.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 3

Here’s a few I’ve read/watched recently, more cholesterol focused than diabetes but I believe they are related.

https://peterattiamd.com/the-straight-dope-on-cholesterol-part-i/ - A pretty detailed guide on all aspects cholesterol. Referencing could be better, but still not bad.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32653422/- Review and Meta-Analysis on egg consumption and  cardiovascular disease.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-38461-y – an interesting one, specifically figure 2.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXKJaQeteE0 – a nice easy to understand video, no real detail though.

To me it all just kind of makes sense. Carbs trigger an insulin response, today’s carbs are supercharged, therefore pancreas gets worn out. In addition, to that the carbs affect the cholesterol, 2 birds with one stone.

Having said all that, just cutting out majority processed foods would probably be enough. But low carb, with lots of vegetables IMO would probably be best.
 


good stuff
thanks for sharing

legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 3439
Man who stares at charts (and stars, too...)
Oh my fucking Gox  Shocked
I consider the odds that "repaid" Gox Users will keep most of their coins in this bottomy times to be quite high, but i'd not be surprised about a steep rise, followed by a 2017/18 like blow-off top. Strange, but i am kind of awaiting a double top like this since the beginning of 2022, and so far everything fell in place. On the other hand, i wouldn't be surprised much more if King Daddy will be choosing a (very?) different route.

 Cool

EDIT: Fuck Brexit! On every second item i order from the UK, shipment gets halted at customs office because of "missing import license". Fuck you, Boris!
hero member
Activity: 1120
Merit: 571
🍆 $22k

I am not buying.



26k is another new price prediction this time by Lark Davis


legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 3962
Merit: 11519
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
With Celsius having paid off their debt and FTX saying they have billions of dollars to backstop the crypto industry, you might say this liquidity crunch is on the way to being behind us.  The market is celebrating this news.  Another development in the market is that mtgox sent out another update about funds being distributed to owners.  While no date has been set, it is clear progress is being made towards distribution.  ETH2 also completed another merge test yesterday, signaling those locked funds may be released by the end of the year.  You can see the stage is set for the next major rally.  We just have to wait for the pieces to fall into place.  I'd urge caution until mtgox and eth2 are in the rearview, but then I'd say you'll want to be one of the first through the door (if you're a market timer, always buy if you're a sat stacker).  

I won't be too optimistic if i was in your case, I mean july 28th is right around the corner when the bureau of economic analysis  will release their "Advance Estimate"  of the 2nd quarter of 2022 and it will most likely show that we are oficially in a recession, Which is... you know not good especially for BTC

So i would probably want to hold off and wait for this storm to pass before dumping my life savings on bitcoin.

Oh? Shocked Shocked

I did not realize that you were such a bear Hamich124D.  Hopefully you realize where we are at in terms of the 200-week moving average and also other BTC price dynamic understandings whether considering 1) stock to flow, 2) four year fractal and/or 3) exponential s-curve adoption based on Metcalfe principles and networking effects, and you are not sufficiently/adequately failing/refusing to pee pare ur lil selfie for UP in case your lil correlation theory does not play out exactly (or even close) to how you seem to be expecting.

Nah mate i'am bullish and currently holding bitcoin myself, I just shared that because i thought WO would be interested to see another "POV".

Any extra info is usefull in my opinion, Even if you may not like it.

I put your quote back in (above) for convenience (and clarity) regarding what we are talking about.

First of all, in your first response, it appears that you are making your own opinion, and you are not citing someone else's opinion.

Second.. who gives any shits if I like your opinion or not.  You have a right to have (and express) whatever opinion that you like to have. whether dumb or smart.  I was merely trying to figure out what the fuck you are talking about.

Third:  for clarification this is my understanding about what happened.  You posted some kind of bearish assertion (your post referenced above) regarding the bitcoin price being correlated to current negative macro circumstances.  I then asked you why are you so bearish and I hope that you are prepared for UP.   Then you responded that you really did not mean what you said in your post, you were merely providing an alternative perspective (implying that you are so wonderful to be able to provide that alternative perspective that is not your own and suggesting that I don't like your contents).

Yeah... I don't like your contents:  not because it is predicting negative BTC price moves because I could give few shits if you want to predict negative BTC price moves based on dumb reasonings.. I have seen plenty of lame-ass dumbness through the years, but instead I don't like your contents: because I don't know what the fuck you are talking about, and when I tried to get a wee bit of clarification from uie-pooie, instead of clarifying you waffled, deflected and refused to take responsibility for the assertion that you had made in your initial post..
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 4775
diamond-handed zealot
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 3836
Merit: 4969
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
Quote
Transnational Repression Scheme to Silence Critics of the People's Republic of China Residing in the United States
Quote
Defendants Include Federal Law Enforcement Officer and Private Investigator Who Lied to FBI Agents and Obstructed Justice
Quote
“As alleged, this case involves a multifaceted campaign to silence, harass, discredit and spy on U.S. residents for exercising their freedom of speech – aided by a current federal law enforcement officer and a private investigator who provided confidential information about U.S. residents from a restricted law enforcement database, and when confronted about their improper conduct, lied and destroyed evidence,”

https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/pr/five-individuals-indicted-crimes-related-transnational-repression-scheme-silence
legendary
Activity: 4354
Merit: 9201
'The right to privacy matters'

No one mentioning Larry Niven's Ringworld?


First read it at 13 and its still a favorite.

Old memory read it a long time ago.
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 4597
The classic Dyson sphere with 100% efficiency would only be detectable by observing objects orbiting the star. Basically like a black hole. Inefficient sphere would radiate heat (infrared) and be detectable by JWST.

My thoughts too. Though there would surely be diminishing returns and you'd have some emissions at a very low frequency.

But a Dyson sphere can also be built as a ring or rings around a star. Let's say a strip with solar panels going around the star. This could be detectable because the ring could cause fluctuations in the light emitted by the star.

No one mentioning Larry Niven's Ringworld?


Only those with 100% efficiency would be undetectable in infrared, but 95% efficient would still be visible, apparently.
Dyson himself thought that it would radiate, but there is a lot of discussion back and forth.
See discussion of params here:
https://canmom.art/physics/dyson-spheres
and/or
https://www.tillett.info/2016/08/03/carnot-efficient-dyson-spheres-are-undetectable-by-infrared-surveys/
and
https://www.quora.com/If-a-star-were-fully-enclosed-in-a-Dyson-sphere-would-the-ambient-temperature-inside-increase-significantly-over-time
https://www.quora.com/Why-wouldnt-a-Dyson-sphere-eventually-just-melt-from-the-trapped-heat-of-the-star

Re ringworld-awesome sci-fi, not sure it could be detected with JWST, though...if it exists.
Generally, no systems are 100% efficient and heat radiation occurs.
legendary
Activity: 3836
Merit: 4969
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it

No one mentioning Larry Niven's Ringworld?


First read it at 13 and its still a favorite.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2373
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
The classic Dyson sphere with 100% efficiency would only be detectable by observing objects orbiting the star. Basically like a black hole. Inefficient sphere would radiate heat (infrared) and be detectable by JWST.

My thoughts too. Though there would surely be diminishing returns and you'd have some emissions at a very low frequency.

But a Dyson sphere can also be built as a ring or rings around a star. Let's say a strip with solar panels going around the star. This could be detectable because the ring could cause fluctuations in the light emitted by the star.

No one mentioning Larry Niven's Ringworld?
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 2470
$120000 in 2024 Confirmed
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 1869
Merit: 5781
Neighborhood Shenanigans Dispenser
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
Jump to: