Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 32873. (Read 26695891 times)

donator
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019
if this thing doesn't move soon I'm going to have to stop looking.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
Protect yourself and hold as little fiat as you can safely get away with.

This ^^

If not Bitcoin then anything inflation proof will do as a way to store money, even things like collecting antiques

We are in a deflationary phase now actually.

You start buying when blood is running in the streets?


I'll buy when I think I can sell for more than 2% profit within 24 hours. (With relative certainty)



The problem is, under those conditions one frequently ends up selling high and buying higher.

So? It still accumulates profit, that's better than the average market participant can say.

Still inferior to the performance of buy and hold, even if you bought at $32. Each one of those gaps between selling high and buying higher represents a reduction of your holdings. The average market participant thinks they are smarter than the market as a whole, if not in confidence then by their actions. Presuming that their action represents the best course of action, while it seldom is. Sell high, buy higher is a really awful strategy. The way to mitigate risk beyond just buy and hold is really DCA. And that looks more like what our buy whale is doing... The support is there,

I'm disappointed.
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
Gresham's Lawyer
...
Sure, but the point is that in bitcoin world big money doesn't automatically mean more money, because you can't print and loan bitcoins. That's pretty simple.

You don't think there were tycoons & beggars with gold standard?  We had the silly thing in US 'til the seventies!  As far as lending with Bitcoin, i can talk you through many interesting lending schemes where the total number of bitcoins in circulation is not the ceiling (hint:  when you borrow a million dollars from a bank, do you take it home in a trunk?)

The trick you will have to solve in order to have this paragraph make sense, is how to get someone to accept a fractionally reserve borrowed "~bitcoin" as payment.

I have x bitcoins.  I issue you & 10 other people letters of credit for x/9.  Magic. Smiley

OK, next you are going to have to solve the problem of how to get someone to accept a letter of credit for Bitcoin.  Or in other words, the same thing I wrote in the last challenge to this scheme.  You've done no magic yet.  It is ~bitcoin, or !bitcoin if you prefer...  Who accepts it?

The same person who accepts anything more interesting than a pawnshop/payday loan.  Unless you're used to asking for your loans in used, nonsequential twenties, you're familiar with one piece of paper representing another.

Edit:  Think "line of credit."  If it seems inconceivable to you, figure out how the fractional reserve system come into being -- there's no need to "print" all the monyz you lend Smiley
Edit2 (tangent):  I will also issue Crumblets, paper promissory notes denominated in bitcoins.  As tangible currency, requiring no internet access or gizmos, this folding money will become more popular than Bitcoin itself. Smiley
Paper is paper.  The old game is not the new game, we're talking bitcoin crypto-currency, so you need to improve your trick.

So you don't know anyone who would either take the bait either?  And now you want me to do this magic trick for you?
I am well aware of how the fractional reserve system came into being.  The problems which were solved by the creation of fractional reserve (carrying heavy gold and silver from place to place) are not problems of bitcoin, it moves faster than most cash equivalents and is lighter than a feather.

To perform your magic trick, you are going to have to find "marks" and "patsys" with whom to trade your "letters of credit" !bitcoins.  The trick will be on those that accept !bitcoins for payment for anything rather than asking for bitcoins.  I may have a few bridges to sell to your customers, but I am not going to be accepting the !bitcoins for them.

But hey, you are so confidant in this scheme, maybe you are that patsy? Would you like to buy an online wallet account that has !bitcoin in it for the privilege paying interest on it in bitcoin?  I have been told the seller promises that they won't sell the bitcoin backing it to more than 10 other people and that they won't take the bitcoins out of it suddenly.  It is just as good as bitcoin, really it is. Wink  We can call it !ripple if you like.

If you are going to do this scam, you are going to need a bunch of shills who are going to offer to accept your !bitcoin from your mark after the mark gets !bitcoin from you.  Fractional reserve is a confidence game.  Why else do banks build such impressive structures? They want your confidence.  I'm not saying it can't be done, or even that you can't do it.  If it will work anywhere, it will probably work in a high-trust society like USA.

We are way off the topic of MtGox walls.  My apologies to the rest, if anyone objects, we'll start a fractional reserve bitcoin thread in a more appropriate place.
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1019
again, how do I run my own chart buddy? I want to be able to shift time back and forth with it
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
...

It was 1971 when Nixon separated gold from USD.

Still unsure what you meant to say with your chart, but actually looked at the numbers for the first time.  You sneak!  1900 to 2020?  Really?  Who's doin' all the prognosticating?  "Reliable Source"? Cheesy Cheesy
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
If your libertarian romantic ever plays out I rather think we are facing the extinction of the human race.  

Why would rejecting institutionalised violence cause the extinction of the human race? Are peaceful people incapable of functioning without being threatened from day to day?

Institutional violence is just a result of urbanization, the entire population is urbanized, and dependent of the financial system to keep them from dying from starvation.

IF you are serious start a farm.

Eh? You don't need institutional violence in order to have a financial system. Why would you think otherwise?
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
...
Sure, but the point is that in bitcoin world big money doesn't automatically mean more money, because you can't print and loan bitcoins. That's pretty simple.

You don't think there were tycoons & beggars with gold standard?  We had the silly thing in US 'til the seventies!  As far as lending with Bitcoin, i can talk you through many interesting lending schemes where the total number of bitcoins in circulation is not the ceiling (hint:  when you borrow a million dollars from a bank, do you take it home in a trunk?)

The trick you will have to solve in order to have this paragraph make sense, is how to get someone to accept a fractionally reserve borrowed "~bitcoin" as payment.

I have x bitcoins.  I issue you & 10 other people letters of credit for x/9.  Magic. Smiley

OK, next you are going to have to solve the problem of how to get someone to accept a letter of credit for Bitcoin.  Or in other words, the same thing I wrote in the last challenge to this scheme.  You've done no magic yet.  It is ~bitcoin, or !bitcoin if you prefer...  Who accepts it?

The same person who accepts anything more interesting than a pawnshop/payday loan.  Unless you're used to asking for your loans in used, nonsequential twenties, you're familiar with one piece of paper representing another.

Edit:  Think "line of credit."  If it seems inconceivable to you, figure out how the fractional reserve system come into being -- there's no need to "print" all the monyz you lend Smiley
Edit2 (tangent):  I will also issue Crumblets, paper promissory notes denominated in bitcoins.  As tangible currency, requiring no internet access or gizmos, this folding money will become more popular than Bitcoin itself. Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
Gresham's Lawyer
...
Sure, but the point is that in bitcoin world big money doesn't automatically mean more money, because you can't print and loan bitcoins. That's pretty simple.

You don't think there were tycoons & beggars with gold standard?  We had the silly thing in US 'til the seventies!  As far as lending with Bitcoin, i can talk you through many interesting lending schemes where the total number of bitcoins in circulation is not the ceiling (hint:  when you borrow a million dollars from a bank, do you take it home in a trunk?)

The trick you will have to solve in order to have this paragraph make sense, is how to get someone to accept a fractionally reserve borrowed "~bitcoin" as payment.

I have x bitcoins.  I issue you & 10 other people letters of credit for x/9.  Magic. Smiley

OK, next you are going to have to solve the problem of how to get someone to accept a letter of credit for Bitcoin.  Or in other words, the same thing I wrote in the last challenge to this scheme.  You've done no magic yet.  It is ~bitcoin, or !bitcoin if you prefer...  Who accepts it?
legendary
Activity: 4242
Merit: 5039
You're never too old to think young.



It was 1971 when Nixon separated gold from USD.

Looks like a bubble.  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1000
Antifragile
...
Sure, but the point is that in bitcoin world big money doesn't automatically mean more money, because you can't print and loan bitcoins. That's pretty simple.

You don't think there were tycoons & beggars with gold standard?  We had the silly thing in US 'til the seventies!  As far as lending with Bitcoin, i can talk you through many interesting lending schemes where the total number of bitcoins in circulation is not the ceiling (hint:  when you borrow a million dollars from a bank, do you take it home in a trunk?)

insert large graph here

It was 1971 when Nixon separated gold from USD.

Do you want to say that a country with a currency backed by gold can't get in debt or go bankrupt?
History has so many examples proving the opposite.

Btw , how many times did Greece failed in the past? =)))

I think the thing with gold backed money is it reduces greatly the liquidity, and hence expansion, of the money supple. So those countries generally limit growth, which isn't a bad thing but when there is global competition, I can see why they did it (not that I agree with it fully.)
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
...
Sure, but the point is that in bitcoin world big money doesn't automatically mean more money, because you can't print and loan bitcoins. That's pretty simple.

You don't think there were tycoons & beggars with gold standard?  We had the silly thing in US 'til the seventies!  As far as lending with Bitcoin, i can talk you through many interesting lending schemes where the total number of bitcoins in circulation is not the ceiling (hint:  when you borrow a million dollars from a bank, do you take it home in a trunk?)

The trick you will have to solve in order to have this paragraph make sense, is how to get someone to accept a fractionally reserve borrowed "~bitcoin" as payment.

I have x bitcoins.  I issue you & 10 other people letters of credit for x/9.  Magic. Smiley
donator
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019
...
Sure, but the point is that in bitcoin world big money doesn't automatically mean more money, because you can't print and loan bitcoins. That's pretty simple.

You don't think there were tycoons & beggars with gold standard?  We had the silly thing in US 'til the seventies!  As far as lending with Bitcoin, i can talk you through many interesting lending schemes where the total number of bitcoins in circulation is not the ceiling (hint:  when you borrow a million dollars from a bank, do you take it home in a trunk?)

The trick you will have to solve in order to have this paragraph make sense, is how to get someone to accept a fractionally reserve borrowed "~bitcoin" as payment.

Winklevoss to the rescue?
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
Gresham's Lawyer
...
Sure, but the point is that in bitcoin world big money doesn't automatically mean more money, because you can't print and loan bitcoins. That's pretty simple.

You don't think there were tycoons & beggars with gold standard?  We had the silly thing in US 'til the seventies!  As far as lending with Bitcoin, i can talk you through many interesting lending schemes where the total number of bitcoins in circulation is not the ceiling (hint:  when you borrow a million dollars from a bank, do you take it home in a trunk?)

The trick you will have to solve in order to have this paragraph make sense, is how to get someone to accept a fractionally reserve borrowed "~bitcoin" as payment.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
...
Sure, but the point is that in bitcoin world big money doesn't automatically mean more money, because you can't print and loan bitcoins. That's pretty simple.

You don't think there were tycoons & beggars with gold standard?  We had the silly thing in US 'til the seventies!  As far as lending with Bitcoin, i can talk you through many interesting lending schemes where the total number of bitcoins in circulation is not the ceiling (hint:  when you borrow a million dollars from a bank, do you take it home in a trunk?)



It was 1971 when Nixon separated gold from USD.

What point are you trying to make?

That it's not fair that if job costs you too much you can simple print more money to buy it. That's what kings are doing today. If people don't do what they want, they simple pay more (with printed money). Economy can't work like that. It was a scheme to separate USD from gold, to trick people to slavery for the kings.

Economy not only can, but does work that way.  As others have already pointed out, gold standard has nothing to do with ability to rack up debt.  Further, please explain to me why it is awful for US to have its current national debt -- as a mental exercise.  What would happen if it continued to climb?  Expand.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
...
Sure, but the point is that in bitcoin world big money doesn't automatically mean more money, because you can't print and loan bitcoins. That's pretty simple.

You don't think there were tycoons & beggars with gold standard?  We had the silly thing in US 'til the seventies!  As far as lending with Bitcoin, i can talk you through many interesting lending schemes where the total number of bitcoins in circulation is not the ceiling (hint:  when you borrow a million dollars from a bank, do you take it home in a trunk?)



It was 1971 when Nixon separated gold from USD.

What point are you trying to make?

That it's not fair that if job costs you too much you can simple print more money to buy it. That's what kings are doing today. If people don't do what they want, they simple pay more (with printed money). Economy can't work like that. It was a scheme to separate USD from gold, to trick people to slavery for the kings.
Jump to: