Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 355. (Read 26713010 times)

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

Funny thing: the launch was a disaster.
If you buy WLF (I like the acronym as an Italian), you have a 12-month vesting period, which renders the token pretty useless, as it is clearly a pump-and-dump scheme.

it's possible, but maybe d--e or s---u, lol

Trump launched his own coin so I am thinking he will attack other coins to help his coin.

Well atleast it's going to be in the favour of Bitcoin so I have no complaints
I just want to see the long awaited bull run already

I guess can’t get enough of that Donald Trump.

Oh well.

Vance to take over in under two years.

Should be interesting.

If its already decided then I guess there's no reason to go out and vote.

Looks like Trump election might trigger a super bull run soon?

a new nice piece of gear just came out.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5506695

I ordered the quiet model

https://www.gekkoscience.com/product/bitaxe-gamma-gekkoscience-edition-silent/


you will like it

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

I don’t bash:
Tesla
Apple
Amazon
Microsoft.

Never owned shares of them,but I don’t own stocks.

 There is a lot to bash Amazon over whether you own some shares or not. 

late to the party.


hey I could have grabbed amazon stock back in the 90s.

i don’t run around and bash amazon.

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

Awww I didn't include all the possiblities, but I think you get my point.

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

A lowcoiner?

Sorry, i understood the original question as passive aggressive vs. (for)giving way of reacting to naysaying nocoiners, then came out with the seemingly unrelated answer, pointing to what makes us feel good in life. My thoughts are (more than) sometimes, how to say it... not quite straight.
Also related, i tried some "biohacking"- substance lately, only to find out that it made me a little more confused, but luckily it is already getting better slowly after i stopped taking it two days ago.
For the definition of Ego, we'd have to go more out of scope than we'd want in regards to this discussion, but i better omit this (for) now, not to write myself into more confusion.



It seems to be getting beyond my ability to follow, since I thought that initially we were talking about whether or not to laugh at the face of the no coiner/low coiner - bitcoin naysayer.
[/quote]

I was triggered by the term "free will", which was a main point of a big ethical discussion while i did improve my spiritual skills through an extensive seminar.
To keep it short, we are following a set of moral rules, culturally evolved in our society, which are opposed to actions of "free will", and these rules tell us to stay in social interactions longer than we'd want to, and to get out of them in ways we'd normally wouldn't want to follow.


I think that I do understand this part, yet I am not sure how easy it would be to just change the way that we choose to interact with others... especially people who are already used to interacting with you.  It is easier to change your ways of interactions with strangers or people you just met as compared with people you already established relationships and interaction practices.
[/quote]
Instead of easy i'd use convenient. The more unconvenient way, but only in short term, is to just tell them friendly and straightforward. In the long run, getting out of interactions that are fruitless and kept up mainly for good manners, even current and regular ones, is freeing time and energy to engange in more fruitful interactions with other people. It's normal to let relationships just fade out, sometimes even end them abruptly (ghosting as an extreme example), but i switched to just "thank you... i can't... because..." and go on. Before that i was used to (try to) keep up relationships for good manners, but that wasn't either honest nor "free" at all.


I am not going to disagree that there can be some challenges in changing our ways of thinking or changing our ways of interacting, yet I doubt that you can presume that change is necessary or even that if we might be disadvantaged (or not able to learn more) by doubling down with our already existing practices.  We can have a lot of interactions with people in our lives and some of them interactions might not be very often, and I am not going to presume that there is any advantage if I come across some friend or relative with whom I had not interacted for more than 5 years, but then he is acting like a totally different person from my previous interaction with him.  If so, I might choose not to interact  with him or to cut the interaction short if I am having trouble understanding him... and you might also consider that there could be someone with whom we had not interacted for close to 20 years, but then we meet and after 15-30 minutes, we start to tell the same stories that we did 20 years a go, and there is a bit of comfort in that and a bit of comfort in measuring the extent to which each of us is the same and how each of us might show that we might have changed during that elapsed time.

[/quote]

That describes most of what i tried to say before in a more straightforward way, thanks. My explanations were based on concepts of how we feel when interacting. The two examples you were showing, the after 5-year vs. 20-year interactions are set apart by feeling slightly uncomfortable, vs. feeling comfortable in interacting, and i advocated for letting these feelings decide to truly keep up or end these interactions, even if we'd fear disadvantages (at first glance) to do so - sometimes. You know, like being (seemingly) friendly to the boss at work, while constantly having a sense of feeling awkward because you don't really like his personality or motives. In this case it might be hard to just stop interacting with him, but if you choose to keep acting, you're a slave to him anyway, no?
On the other hand, sometimes we might behave arrogant to people that don't really deserve it (nocoiners?), but to be honest: who really does? This is just feeding our Ego. It's sufficient to just stay passive, in a more understanding way, without having to "i told you so", because if they are honest to themselves, they already well know that you told them so. Just like one would deal with a crying child that got hurt after he was warned about the possibility of injury. "I told you so" just gets the child embarassed and maybe mad at you, because it well knows you did. But then, they need your loving consolation.

One thing about laughing at nocoiners: Believe it or not, i am the type of guy that never laughs at someone, ever. My kids always wondered how i was able to watch those "don't try to laugh" clips with them without showing a reaction, with the exception of "ouch, that must have hurt, big time!".



#metoo
The true reasons of splitting society are much more complex, while the assumption that money can buy happiness is quite the root mistake of this particular plot. I won't go into more detail here, because i'd lose myself in many words, possibly without really being successful in getting to the point.

Let's have a survey.

Who wrote that paper? Cross your answer.

[  ]    A coiner
[  ]    A nocoiner