[edited out]
quoted till I can read it.
Maybe this will suffice until hell freezes over
Participant | Key Points |
JayJuanGee: | Money inflow for 7x increase depends on price at liftoff; 3x-4x by 2025 seems more likely. |
I claim that I did not say that (or I did not mean that). I meant to say that when measuring our anticipated BTC price increase, we should probably start with $27k as our base starting off point rather than using current BTC prices... and ultimately, I was probably waffling a bit in regards to whatever I consider to be the most likely of outcomes for the top of this cycle... and whatever, how am I supposed to remember what I said. go back and read it, in the event that anyone might be remotely interested in the actual words at the moment of the post.
d_eddie: | Critiques JayJuanGee's bearish outlook; asks for more likely scenarios than 7x increase. |
I would like to take this opportunity to say that I think d_eddie does not like me.
JayJuanGee: | Acknowledges confusion in discussing scenarios; emphasizes the complexity of probabilities. |
Predicting the future (for any of us sorcery guru wannabes) comes off as even more complex when you put it like that.
d_eddie: | Questions the validity of assigning high probabilities to specific outcomes; suggests a conservative approach. |
I thought that I proclaimed that d_eddie was being too conservative, and he then doubled down on the idea of both being conservative and asking me to answer and to specify what I thought. .which, good luck with that proposition.
LFC_Bitcoin: | Believes 3.5x increase is more achievable than 7x; cautiously optimistic. |
That my memory of what LFC said, and sure if we are referring to going up 3.5x from here, on the face of it 3.5x would be more achievable than 7x, and no one seems to be suggesting that 7x would not be in reach or even within the realm of reasonably possible - even though maybe it seems difficult for any of us to assign very high probabilities to higher price multiples.. and gosh, if you think about it 3.5x and 7x are ONLY 2x apart, so it is not like there is a whole hell of a lot of difference when it comes down to considering historically what bitcoin's price movements have done in considering what reasonably could be within reach for future BTC price dynamics...
yeah, yeah, yeah, we know that past performance is not indicative of future performance, yet if we have some senses of bitcoin fundamentals and what bitcoin actually is, as a protocol layer of money that it attached to digital information, then surely we may well be able to consider that bitcoin is not totally hindered to perform within historical parameters and even that there are still possibilities that some of bitcoin's current cycles could end up out performing prior cycles... so yeah, we have to consider a lot of the performance possibilities with a bit of wonder in regards to what could be reasonably possible or probable, and then how various aspects of bitcoin's price dynamics related to ongoing growth in various network effects (as
outlined by Trace Mayer) might be playing out on the ground in real time.
Biodom: | Recalls past price movements; suggests 3-3.5x is possible but 7x is quite rare. |
Biodom is a whimp.. Let's just get that part straight... hahahaha.
I don't even not like Biodom.coinlary: | Ponders the next price pause; suggests the current pause is at $66,479. |
It turns out that we seem to have a new honey badger price pause at $67,922... Who would-a-thunk?
This is an ongoingly changing dynamic, and we are getting some action in these here parts, and potentially some
CCCCCCCCCIIIIIIIIIIIIIITTTTTTTTTTTTTEEEEEEEEEEEE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, too.
As soon as the price pauses seem to have had accomplished their pausing, they resume in their pausing at some other location. Is that the definition of a "non-pausening"?.
Historically a lot of bears and traders have gotten reckt based on these kinds of BTC price dynamic tendencies.
MrNata: | Speculates on Bitcoin's potential to break records; emphasizes preparation for the inevitable price increases. |
Whether that was a speculation from MrNata or from this here cat, who can go wrong with a prediction like that? In other words, "we" might have to vote for MrNata as our new BTC price predicting guru
wannabe.
AlcoHoDL: | Uses haikus to express optimism about Bitcoin's future and praises your skillz; questions the meaning of "moon in June" and then ponders the nature of Phil's skillz |
That is be called KORECK.
Therefore, you are highlighting that there continue to be two outstanding and unanswered questions.
OutOfMemory: | Comments on current price stability; suggests we are in a neutral position at present. |
Doesn't feel like a neutral to me, but hey? what do I know?
edit: I forgot to mention that the above summary was generated by AI while I added/substituted a few words and put the results into a table.
Well.. now you disclose.
Isn't that cheating?
Personally, I would prefer to here what dee homers gots to say.
I have not checked for accuracy but as JJG only gets two entries, I'm going to assume the entire table is BS.
You are going to have to get busy then if you want to make up for the misinformation that "we" ended up receiving.
I was on the fringes of sending uie pooie an s-merit for all of your seeming analytical work, even though it came off as wrong, yet when I heard that a botty potty did most (if not all) of the actual grunt work, my smerit-pushing stiffler se convertio its lil selfie into a noodle... which means that a noodle no doesn't work too well and ends up taking away most, if not all, of the pleasures and:
CCCCCCCCCIIIIIIIIIIIIIITTTTTTTTTTTTTEEEEEEEEEEEE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, Green stalks grow higher
Eyes fixed to the sky, waiting
Godzilla candle?
#haiku
What is the difference between a Godzilla candle and a gamma squeeze?
#Asking for a friend.Omega too?
should I ask the difference?
Omega, versus Godzilla versus gamma.
$67,439
Bears RIP.
did not age well did it?
in 3 hours
65k to 68k to 64k to 66k
pretty nice action.
note to jjg i rounded and ballparked those numbers.as for phil with the skill thats for me to know.
1) I am going to suggest that the fact that you ballpark/rounded your numbers likely helps to establish that the whole uppity and downity is mostly a kind of "don't wake me up zone," even though surely sometimes there could be some buy and/or sell orders that might have had been triggered
**.. but not enough BTC price moves to get too Citeeeee.
**Just to clarify: I am not suggesting trading of dee cornz, and I am also not suggesting sell orders for the purpose of accumulating more BTC. For anyone who considers himself to be in the process of accumulating more BTC, then it seems to me that such persons should be mostly, if not exclusively, involved in buying dee cornz and not selling dee cornz, especially since selling dee cornz is not a good way to accumulate more cornz.2) Somewhat a "secret skill" about which only you (and perhaps AlcoHoDL) seem to know.
Ok. no problem
For now, I will act like I did not see anything, unless you guys continue referring to such presumptive "skill."
Almost 9000 BTC bought through the ETFs yesterday.
Any effect on the price?
Most of the time I have no idea what is going on with this price action.
Well. From the perspective of this here cat, even though we still seem to largely be in the middle of "don't wake me up zone," you better snap out of it - not that there is anything to really know for the moment beyond price of dee cornz seems to be "going UPpity"
- at least for the moment.Almost 9000 BTC bought through the ETFs yesterday.
Any effect on the price?
Most of the time I have no idea what is going on with this price action.
well maybe the big swings today are the effect you are looking for.
Oh yeah.. "effects" I forgot to respond to that.
There could be a "supply shock" in the room with us right now, as I type this post.
Perhaps?