Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 3889. (Read 26711754 times)

.... the whole CH4 argument as to it causing any "climate change" at all is even more unsupported with rigorous science than the CO2 fraud that has become a politicised juggernaut

... CH4 is quite a bit heavier than air and rarely gets above any significant height where it can change the atmospheric solar radiative absorbtion balance ... not only that it has a much faster cycle than CO2 and any changes increases/decreases are backgrounded into earth's other natural processes in 15-20 years

.... the massive topsoil layer of the Great Plains was the result of millenia of grazing bovines (buffalo) eating grass and depositing manure into the soil, this is an obvious net CO2 SINK out of the atmosphere into the soil, grazing stock are net carbon sinks even if you accept CH4 can have a net effect on radiative balance ( which it doesnt)

... methane beat up is just another manufactured hysterical crisis to exert more control over your lives, first it was energy (CO2) lies and now CH4 lies. ...  it's all tidily lining up for control of the means of transport, production and food which is straight out of the communist playbook

... I'm not saying the commies are behind it but when you get more and more shaky, shitty science coming out of the same field (atmospheric sciences) then it's looking a lot like they are under the sway of some kind of political influence or political confirmation biases

... and look around you for the economic results, the evidence is looking a lot like a communist disaster zone that we've observed in many other countries that go down that crazy sociological path to devastation and ruin ... except it's now on a global scale

I never have methane guilt, even in a crowded elevator.
I just blame it on the dude next to me...

Explanation

You certainly know how to choose a good steak.

All that methane guilt just evaporates away with the thought of that hitting the charcoal grill.

the noon wall report

Bitcoin currently trading near $39.1kish with candles being vigorously contested locally.

dyor

1h


4h

stronghands

Mmmm.



Bitcoin mining at its finest.

There are additives that can be included in cattle diet that can substantially reduce methane production.

Including extracts of red algae, some types of seaweed, increasing oil and fat content of diet and a new product called Bovaer which requires only 1gm a day to reduce methane output by 30 - 50%.

Given the looming worldwide energy shortages, brought about by the climate change hysteria shutting down fossil fuel generation before alternatives are up and running plus cancelling oil exploration and new pipelines, I can see this sort of stuff surrounding methane put on the back burner for a decade or so.

$39k again I know lots of observers miserable at this price. But I have to pinch myself sometimes, like when we first went over $40k. I repeated to myself forty fucking thousand dollars. Unbelievable, it still is.

Sadly had to sell some coin from my BTC savings / deposit wallet to purchase extra fertilizer, which has more than doubled in price since last season. I'm betting on high farm produce prices this Autumn.  

Explanation

It surely is time for Bitcoin to be finally tested for real.  The 2008 crisis was too early for Bitcoin to show what it can do.  But if Bitcoin gets at the end of the day to NOT be a safehaven anymore, is it bad?  I would not say so.  It can still do exactly what it does right now, just the average human's perspective changes.

I kind of get it but I also do not.  If you are the survivor of a post-nuclear world, then what are the actual chances you get to meet another survivor?  In that kind of world, not even seeds, banknotes or coffee is helpful anymore.

If you do get to meet another survivor who is interested in barter, then you can assume they are in need of equipment, in need of food or they have enough food and equipment and want wealth.  I just know there would be some who would look after wealth.  I can only imagine some dreaming about the world they could build with all the wealth they can get by taking advantage of other survivors.  Particularly today's upper class, which can today afford building an anti nuclear bunker to shelter entire families for decades long.

In the last case I have mentioned, even Bitcoin is helpful as long as there still is a way to transact.  If and when Internet becomes a thing again, Bitcoin will still offer us the utility of a censorship resistant currency.  In fact, Bitcoin may be able to preserve its utility way better than Gold does.  Gold is useful today, but in a post nuclear world I doubt it will be used in industry.  I mean, is there even going to be an industry after nuclear Apocalypse?  But still, Gold would be useful too.  Maybe nuclear is not the end of life on Earth after all, and Gold still is one of the rarest metals even after such a catastrophe.  Maybe even rarer when you know there is no mining company doing the mining anymore.  But maybe then all assets become rare.  And then, look at Bitcoin.  Does it look like all these insane bull runs have a particular sense attached to it?  Besides demand and limited supply, but even then Bitcoin still is an asset with bull run cycles like few to no other assets ever had.

Edit.  Maybe Bitcoin's crazy bull runs make sense if I think about halving and the cost of mining.  Cost of flour increases when the cost of production does, right?

Sometimes things do not need to make sense to work.  GME and other assets pumping like crazy is one example.  Who the hell actually thinks assets trending in tremendous hype are worth investing into?  They only make you poorer most of the time.  Bitcoin never really sat in so much good main stream lighting before.  Or at least I have never seen it happening.  Yet it turned out to be one of the best ways to preserve value, earn money and stay away from dirty Fiat.

A post-nuclear world is hard to imagine anyway.  There is just too much stuff that is so hard to predict even if we think we can do it.  But one thing is for sure, there is greed even during war.  Even during the Apocalypse.  There will always be greedy humans and in a post nuclear world it is not an exception.

-
Regards,
PrivacyG

Explanation

I am not sure how we can reduce methane production by cattle without reducing cattle numbers.
For a second there I imagine attaching a methane collecting box to their behinds, but then....it is not possible.

On a large scale the solution is an artificial photosynthesis process, no doubt.
In photosynthesis (done by plants), CO2 is captured from the atmosphere and sugars and oxygen (as a byproduct) are produced.
Two problems:
1. Splitting water at the ambient temperature and
2. Running the system at relatively low CO2 concentration (as plants are able to do).

However, it is a scientific/engineering problem that can be eventually solved aka there is NO reasoning as to why it cannot work in principle.

Info:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_photosynthesis

Explanation

So it seems the issue is incomplete combustion which could presumably be solved by appropriate flame technology at the place of combustion.

Again, good that the gas is being used for something useful (and it turns the upgrade into a profit item rather than a cost item) but it's not using it for mining that makes any impact on CO2 or so-called "CO2 equivalent" emissions.

I am not sure (need to check, but probably someone here knows already), but I seem to recall that CH4 has a worse greenhouse profile than even CO2?

EDIT Hasty posting. Sorry. @xhomerx10 does indeed know and promptly explained.

Explanation

Troubleshooting carbs and ignition.

A great groaning dinosaur yawn.

An art that will die with some of us.

(not quite a haiku?)

Explanation

+1 WOsMerit


------


+1 WOsMerit


-------



typical right wingnut response because lack of understanding of basic maths and a unwillingness to educate ones self off of MSM brainwashing  /s?


about 5 seconds on google cause i type slow
'what is digital flare mitigations impact on CO2 emissions?'

https://www.ndlegis.gov/assembly/67-2021/testimony/HFINTAX-2328-20210309-8106-F-CAVNESS_CULLY.pdf

already knew what relative meant..but here you go
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/relative

science...maths...


something is usually better than nothing imho   

Apologies for being snippy but I rarely encounter anything constructive being said by the polarised right or left..it immediately devolves into 'I disagree because you agree' or some such nonsense. We have to do better. We have to do the thousand other little things that seem trivial as well and we must do it globally..as a species...not right or left or any other metric.

An answer has been found for the terrible manipulations of central banks and nations states of your financial sovereignty. An answer has been found to a non-trivial source of what most consider greenhouse gas emissions. An answer has been found to utilise a stranded resource and put it to a beneficial use by lowering mining costs or letting older miners remain profitable as our madhatter pointed out. This bovine implementation appears to have merit as well and should immediately proceed into phase one research.

I can hardly think of better optics than those right there...unless we somehow figure out how to stop wars with Bitcoin.

carry on 

Explanation