Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 4284. (Read 26714049 times)

legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
Wow amazing love you bro…10/10!!!

But I think I need my laptop to wear it because I tried from my phone (iPhone) and it’s coming with white background.

(Btw why iPhone doesn’t support pngs or transparent backgrounds overall?).

GIMP says transparent background.
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 7912

Wow amazing love you bro…10/10!!!

But I think I need my laptop to wear it because I tried from my phone (iPhone) and it’s coming with white background.

(Btw why iPhone doesn’t support pngs or transparent backgrounds overall?).

  Glad you like it!  Sorry I can't test on the iPhone because I don't currently have one but the transparency seems to work in windows and on my android phone.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 2744
Merit: 13647
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
copper member
Activity: 1526
Merit: 2890

Wow amazing love you bro…10/10!!!

But I think I need my laptop to wear it because I tried from my phone (iPhone) and it’s coming with white background.

(Btw why iPhone doesn’t support pngs or transparent backgrounds overall?).
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 4597
..funny..."he" listened.

$45K, 50K or 60K on Dec 31?

I hope for 58K  Grin
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 4354
Merit: 9201
'The right to privacy matters'
stopping buddies streak. he dropped back under 51k and must be disciplined.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 4354
Merit: 9201
'The right to privacy matters'
...
I did a few calculations on dcabtc.com:
Quote
Wow! Buying $5 of Bitcoin every week for 1 year starting on 2011-03-21 would have turned $265 into $407 (+53%)
Wow! Buying $5 of Bitcoin every week for 1 year starting on 2012-03-21 would have turned $265 into $1,749 (+560%)
Wow! Buying $5 of Bitcoin every week for 1 year starting on 2013-03-21 would have turned $265 into $1,010 (+281%)
Wow! Buying $5 of Bitcoin every week for 1 year starting on 2014-03-21 would have turned $265 into $182 (-31%)
Wow! Buying $5 of Bitcoin every week for 1 year starting on 2015-03-21 would have turned $265 into $373 (+40%)
Wow! Buying $5 of Bitcoin every week for 1 year starting on 2016-03-21 would have turned $265 into $417 (+57%)
Wow! Buying $5 of Bitcoin every week for 1 year starting on 2017-03-21 would have turned $265 into $710 (+167%)
Wow! Buying $5 of Bitcoin every week for 1 year starting on 2018-03-21 would have turned $265 into $194 (-26%)
Wow! Buying $5 of Bitcoin every week for 1 year starting on 2019-03-21 would have turned $265 into $211 (-20%)
Wow! Buying $5 of Bitcoin every week for 1 year starting on 2020-03-21 would have turned $265 into $1,230 (+364%)

Seems to be a similar point that I was trying to make in my post (and yeah, you beat me to it Loycebot), but actual real world examples showing the variance.

but that is dca for a year with zero hold after the year.

First off.. I fixed your quote because it was Loyce who had quoted those examples and I responded to him.

Second, Loyce probably gave one year long examples because the infographic was seeming to do the same.. to pick the last year, but not likely a very representative year  - in the event that any of us were to want to measure 1 year's performance at a time.


if you dca 5 a day in 2011 turning the 265 into 407 a year later in 2011 and just hodl till now you would have over 4 usd million worth of BTC.

$407 in 2012 march 21 was how many btc ? about 81 btc so 81 x 50k = 4 million +

Fair point.

so dca and hold  for 1 year has not always worked as a profit for that 1 year so what.

how about dca for 3 years hold the coin

so
2011 to 2014 795 in and what out at end of 3 years
2012 to 2015 795 in and what out at end of 3 years
2013 to 2016
2014 to 2017
2015 to 2018
2016 to 2019
2017 to 2020
2018 to 2021

any of those 3 would be really fucking good  

on second thought maybe march 21 2017 to march 21 2020   could be weak

Seems to me that a lot of people (including yours truly) have been suggesting at least a minimum of a 4-year long investment period.

Of course, anyone could get lucky in a shorter than 4-year investment period of time, but if any of us is attempting to play longer term rather than luck, then we should be shooting for the 4-year - full cycle - minimum... and so presenting it as a 3 year question seems to leave a bit more uncertainties about whether you may or may not be in profits at that time and you may or may not be sufficiently in profits to really be representative of a whole cylce.

If anyone is able to consider 10 years or longer as their investment timeline then such persons are likely even in a better place to be able to be advantaged from compounding values.

It is why I picked 3 years.
loyce clearly shows some 1year dca plans ie 1 and sell lost.

I checked 4 years already and all 4 x 265 = 1060 in sell on the end of year four make good returns every one is over 4x

So after seeing the 1 year data have some losers and I quickly eyed 3 years and thought that every 3 year plan should do really well. at least 2x on 1060
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 3962
Merit: 11519
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
...
I did a few calculations on dcabtc.com:
Quote
Wow! Buying $5 of Bitcoin every week for 1 year starting on 2011-03-21 would have turned $265 into $407 (+53%)
Wow! Buying $5 of Bitcoin every week for 1 year starting on 2012-03-21 would have turned $265 into $1,749 (+560%)
Wow! Buying $5 of Bitcoin every week for 1 year starting on 2013-03-21 would have turned $265 into $1,010 (+281%)
Wow! Buying $5 of Bitcoin every week for 1 year starting on 2014-03-21 would have turned $265 into $182 (-31%)
Wow! Buying $5 of Bitcoin every week for 1 year starting on 2015-03-21 would have turned $265 into $373 (+40%)
Wow! Buying $5 of Bitcoin every week for 1 year starting on 2016-03-21 would have turned $265 into $417 (+57%)
Wow! Buying $5 of Bitcoin every week for 1 year starting on 2017-03-21 would have turned $265 into $710 (+167%)
Wow! Buying $5 of Bitcoin every week for 1 year starting on 2018-03-21 would have turned $265 into $194 (-26%)
Wow! Buying $5 of Bitcoin every week for 1 year starting on 2019-03-21 would have turned $265 into $211 (-20%)
Wow! Buying $5 of Bitcoin every week for 1 year starting on 2020-03-21 would have turned $265 into $1,230 (+364%)

Seems to be a similar point that I was trying to make in my post (and yeah, you beat me to it Loycebot), but actual real world examples showing the variance.

but that is dca for a year with zero hold after the year.

First off.. I fixed your quote because it was Loyce who had quoted those examples and I responded to him.

Second, Loyce probably gave one year long examples because the infographic was seeming to do the same.. to pick the last year, but not likely a very representative year  - in the event that any of us were to want to measure 1 year's performance at a time.


if you dca 5 a day in 2011 turning the 265 into 407 a year later in 2011 and just hodl till now you would have over 4 usd million worth of BTC.

$407 in 2012 march 21 was how many btc ? about 81 btc so 81 x 50k = 4 million +

Fair point.

so dca and hold  for 1 year has not always worked as a profit for that 1 year so what.

how about dca for 3 years hold the coin

so
2011 to 2014 795 in and what out at end of 3 years
2012 to 2015 795 in and what out at end of 3 years
2013 to 2016
2014 to 2017
2015 to 2018
2016 to 2019
2017 to 2020
2018 to 2021

any of those 3 would be really fucking good  

on second thought maybe march 21 2017 to march 21 2020   could be weak

Seems to me that a lot of people (including yours truly) have been suggesting at least a minimum of a 4-year long investment period.

Of course, anyone could get lucky in a shorter than 4-year investment period of time, but if any of us is attempting to play longer term rather than luck, then we should be shooting for the 4-year - full cycle - minimum... and so presenting it as a 3 year question seems to leave a bit more uncertainties about whether you may or may not be in profits at that time and you may or may not be sufficiently in profits to really be representative of a whole cylce.

If anyone is able to consider 10 years or longer as their investment timeline then such persons are likely even in a better place to be able to be advantaged from compounding values.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 3962
Merit: 11519
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
And the other thing that scares me... Recently both Hillary Clinton, and Donald Trump have said basically the same thing.  Bitcoin threatens the dollar hegemony.

I think this is quite meaningful.  And revelatory.  

What I fear is eventually the powers that be will figure out that possibly their very best chance against Bitcoin is not a CDBC, but rather Ethereum.  And this is one of the reasons the vest asshole, and the idiot xxx.eth people are so annoying.  Because they are too greedy, or stupid respectively to recognize that what they are doing it propping up the best chance the old system has to save themselves.

It is my hope that TPTB waste another 10 years trying to push their CDBC experiment.  I think we will see that fail in a GLORIOUS fashion.  In fact, I think their efforts in this will likely add so much game theoretical gasoline to the Bitcoin fire that, though it might be a rocky decade in some ways, one of the missteps they could make and are likely to.

Oh gawd.. you are going to go there.

I am not going to put it past some of the powers that be to actually believe that something like ethereum might be the solution.. but they can't really be that dumb, can they?

In other words, I cannot figure out if they are that dumb or is your post dumb...or a long shot that it could be me...    Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



It's taken around 4 months, but from my understanding the accumulation zone has officially moved up from $33.6K level to $48.4K. Congrats everyone, we did it! 🥳



Ironically, it happens on the day of a break of $50K, but was also due any day now pending an increase of volume which has now taken place.
Still won't be surprised to see a re-test of the 50 Week MA this week or next around $48K, but for now, price looks very bullish indeed.
Next step, moving the accumulation zone up to $56.5K, to build the next level of strong support. Still a way to go yet before ATH.

Nice to hear that our BTC accumulation zone is moving up..
sr. member
Activity: 370
Merit: 451


In my opinion, the entire EV industry is intentionally neglecting the easy answer to instant mass adoption in order to maintain a disposable market.
Imagine, universal externally hot swappable batteries. Gas stations would be able to keep a set inventory of batteries and a reconditioning/recharging process. End users would drive into a station and pull a lever to eject their dead batteries like a cassette tape and insert the new fully charged batteries. The station would charge based on the number of joules remaining verses the number of joules added. Then the end user is back on the road in minutes very similar to the current model of stopping to fill a tank. Add to it the ability to charge at home and this creates a system far superior to the current petro system and mass adoption would be a no brainer.
PersonallyIdrive 60k miles per year (average) for work. My territory of customers covers a large area and it's pretty common for me to stop and fill the tank 2 times and sometimes even 3 in a day. It would make absolutely no sense for me to make the change to an EV with a 300 mile limit between charges, especially since I frequently end up in a hotel overnight to get up and drive again the next day. An hour or more at a gas station to charge is just out of the question as it cuts into valuable response time. But if I could pull in, swap batteries, and be back on the road in 15 minutes or less, this could be a tremendous incentive to switch to EV.
But instead, the manufacturers are banking on the fact that batteries will wear out every 3-5 years and most people will dispose of the car and get another rather than pay the cost of replacing an expensive proprietary battery. A rotating door of repeat sales to a minority as opposed to a mass adoption of the majority. But with subsidies and media blasts who can really blame them.
Jump to: