Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 436. (Read 26715052 times)

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

I think the problem is on their end I've seen this before and they sorted it out within a day

Also might be fat finger dip to $59600 on one of the exchanges thrown the chart off (speculation)

no i just did 5 ,10 ,30 seconds and 1 ,3 ,15 minutes

Looks like a glitch in the rendering/charting lib?
Maybe even client-side?

Did you test with a different browser yet?

1 minute chart



15 minute chart

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

on some topic which is not like me.

what are those lines on chart below?
I have never seen them like that.

this is a 5 second chart

Nah, I just wrote your username to be honest haha.

Lol, I love it. It came pretty close to my goatee.. plus I can frequently be found walking around the house wearing a headlamp! 

I originally tried something similar using the nouns from the playing cards, in a caricature sort of way, which I think theymos might have been my favorite outcome, which depicted him as Trump.    I liked philipma's as well when it depicted him as a penny, "Experiments 3" below. 

In the end, the results were a little too human like and it seemed odd trying to show human-like figures across that many users, it also created weird anomalies with others, it wasn't easy finding one base prompt that would work with all of the nouns in a somewhat consistent way... and the reality is most of them probably looked nothing like the user. Also tried some non-human prompts, but then it sort of looked like a similar type of lizard person for each, which was kinda interesting, but not enough for me.

Here are some random screenshots of the various older tests and experiments, not all specifically WO users, but some are in there. Sorry, I realize these are all user IDs, so it might be a little annoying seeing who is who!

(clickable images for larger size)
Experiments 1


Experiments 2


Experiments 3


I had really weird results feeding existing avatar into AI and using a prompt with nouns to modify it... any without an avatar started with a generic base image of an anonymous figure outline.

---

Been working on some upcoming design(s) which I'm intending to feature various users as well, although maybe not as many this time, and not using nouns. I did recently try to represent the WO itself on one of the cards, The Star card, which can generally be defined in tarot as "Signifying a renewal of spirit, bringing forth calmness, serenity, and an optimistic outlook for the future. This card represents a strong connection to one's spirituality and the potential for emotional and physical healing. It's a symbol of radiant, positive energy."   ...depicted in a semi-abstract sort of way, with some help from AI. I'm not really ready to show it yet though!

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

The sloppiness, oh the sloppiness! Do they even have copy editors who can tell their asses from their elbows?
Head and shoulders is a BEARISH pattern, ffs. What is supposedly happening is an INVERSE head and shoulders, which is bullish. So in the emphasized phrase, below should read ABOVE the neckline, and support should read RESISTANCE.

I've found U.Today to be spectacularly inaccurate, often stating the opposite of what they appear to mean - just as it happened on this occasion.

I’m mostly happy getting all in pre with KK….

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

no white russian?

i like it 

what prompt(s) did you use? looked like some pics incorporated more than just the name.

100% got the dude right.

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

Hard to take, but heads-up pre-flop all-in is just going into an area of probabilities.
Betting 41BB on the Dealer pos. with 46o is just crazy, hoping for SB and BB to fold.
KK is a critical hand to fold in this situation an it has about 80% winning probabilities, too.
But lucky fucker on the Dealer hit the straight with non connecting low cards, honestly he could have hit a full house as well, giving the KK guy a better full with the King on the flop. He was also the biggest stack, so playing his advantages only, not so much the hand value.
How do they say? "That's Poker!"  

EDIT: I always liked KK for going all-in pre flop (in the right situation), not so much for calling an all-in with them. AFAIR i lost too often with pocket kings when calling a pre flop all-in...

Age is but a number, 
Rude to judge by years alone, 
Wisdom grows with time.