Pages:
Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 5. (Read 26707669 times)

legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 2057
A Bitcoiner chooses. A slave obeys.
Oh cool, 101k!

But lets be honest, 100k is so 2024. Next is 200k.
legendary
Activity: 3556
Merit: 9709
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 4354
Merit: 9201
'The right to privacy matters'
99.4 as I type

it wants to do it. 100k today?
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1891
bitcoin retard
Another 1070 coins go to Saylor, nearing on 500k total

ok... so that's why we dip (for ants) again...
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1891
bitcoin retard
I smell something fishy in this approach because they will not have the same effect as the US buying Bitcoin directly, and I think Trump seems to be evading doing that. This is just my thinking.... instead of lending money to people and asking them to pay back in Bitcoin, why not buy the Bitcoin directly? How long will the money stay before they pay back, one year, two, or even ten years? Will Trump be in office when that money will be paid back? Something is definitely not clear with this statement.

It's not a totally whack idea from where Trump sits POV. You lend people dollars and they pay back in Bitcoin. Fine. But they now have dollars which they have to spend which eventually pretty much have to end up buying stuff from the US anyway. So win-win for the US and may be a way to extend dollar hegemony beyond the ever-shaky looking petro-dollar. Now, whether it would fly is another question...

it could go like this:

1)
country borrows 2bn$ from the US

2)
buys BTC for 1bn$ and spends 1bn$

3)
BTC makes more than a 2x after 4 years.

4)
country pays back the BTC that they bought 4 years earlier (now at least worth: 2bn$ + interest for the loan)

5)
US puts BTC into their reserve


For the borrowing country it can be a Saylor move on the nation state level, or.. they just get 1bln$ for free to spend

For the US:
- keeping the influence they always had from lending out USD (contracts for US firms etc)
- pushing the usage of USD
- accumulating BTC for the economy of the future


looks actually quite genius ... at least from my retard brain
legendary
Activity: 1235
Merit: 1202
Another 1070 coins go to Saylor, nearing on 500k total
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 397
Playbet.io - Crypto Casino and Sportsbook
Saylor has bought Bitcoin for nine consecutive Monday.
It's like he's scared he would not see Bitcoin this cheap anytime soon or ever.
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1891
bitcoin retard
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1891
bitcoin retard

 ...and if they're gonna be that big, they should at least contain hooters (or whatever the cool kids are calling them now)




a "dragon fingernail" lady, haha

and no AI involved !  promise   Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1891
bitcoin retard
legendary
Activity: 3948
Merit: 11416
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
[edited out]
Decision to place Bitcoin in exchange is not too advisable because the moment you place your Bitcoin in exchange you are technically not in full control of the Bitcoin. Just imagine what will be the profit of the 5Bitcoin if he decided to hold it for long time considering the price of Bitcoin now in this bullish season.
A bitcoin now is worth approximately $100000, now for the 5 Bitcoin he would have been smiling with $500000 now if he had persevered to hold it for a longer time without placing it in exchange. And considering the present speculations of many investors and government indicating more interest on Bitcoin is a clear indication that Bitcoin hold more better future than what we are seeing now as a bull run of Bitcoin.

I am not sure what point you are making.  My main point about the 5 BTC was to describe how FTX is treating the bankruptcy filing in their paying out the dollar value of the 5 BTC at the time of the bankruptcy filing... so yeah, pretty much the 5 BTC was gone and converted into dollars at the time of the bankruptcy filing on November 11, 2022.

I think that I also made the point that I used to hold a higher percentage of my value on exchanges, yet I think that around the FTX shenanigans many of us (including myself) reduced the percentages that we hold on exchanges even more and I think that was when I went from around 8%-ish that I had been holding on exchanges, to somewhere in the ballpark of sub 5%.

I am not totally against exchanges, even though surely FTX and Sam Bankman Fried and some of his people came into bitcoin in a kind of fast and even weird way, which he seemed to be shady from the start, even though many folks were razzled and dazzled by him, and I am not even saying that I had any clue, except for my considering him to be a bit of a strange character.. so I never ended up adding that exchange to my BTC accounts, even though my own non-exposure (in a direct way) might have been more luck than anything else.

A "sudden" pulse higher to 99.15K.
Saylor bought in again?

I get the sense that in recent times (especially since early November to present in his weekly buys), Saylor/MSTR have been buying throughout the week, so by the time he cryptically tweets something on Sundays he has mostly already bought everything and he likely is just finalizing the tally for their tending to be Monday morning announcement in regards to how much they had bought through the previous week.

Can btc "make" it to 100k by 12am Central?
there is a chance...
It would be nice to start a new week above 100K  Grin

if you had not gotten the memo, in bitcoinlandia, new weeks start at 12 am UTC.. #justsaying.

I just heard a quoted statement of Trump loudly thinking about the planned US Bitcoin reserve, where he said that he wants to convert roughly 200k of seized BTC into the base of said reserve. He also was said to mention lending of $USD to countries and letting them pay the debt back in Bitcoin, which are to be added to the reserve.
What do you think?
If Donald Trump starts reserving bitcoin as a future asset through debtors of the country, from my perspective I don't think that will help to elevate bitcoin price....But if government pass a budget of making bitcoin as one of economic reserved asset as a gold that will trigger bigger investors to come in, to invest on Bitcoin and the price of bitcoin will definitely become indifferent from the previous prices we had so far

This way he supposedly hopes that piling up on reserve Bitcoins won't pump the price.
So no Trump Pump? Called off?
Exactly, it can't make the price of bitcoin to accelerate, but the only  thing that it will do, is that, the current price of bitcoin can't reduce more than 2% because with the influence that US government is reserving bitcoin more individuals that had the experience or information will like to invest in bitcoins on a small ratios

Bitcoin is likely to pump either way...perhaps less in one scenario versus the other, but still.... We are at where we are at in the cycle.. and choose your position size accordingly.

If you been in bitcoin a whole cycle (since June 2020 according to your forum registration date), then at least you have had some time to stack and to front run governments and some of the recent entrants into bitcoin.. and for you the main question might be whether you have stacked enough, yet, or not... It can take a while to build up a stack, and some whimpy guys might be regretting that they did not stack enough, even prior to getting in before you, but still whimpy is still paying off if you have been in long enough.
jr. member
Activity: 19
Merit: 4
The illiteracy in this thread today is shocking 😲
How else can they show you that they aren't hodlers?
WOG's beginning to disappear everyday gradually some only comes when there is a something big happening. too poor  Undecided
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 4839
Addicted to HoDLing!
[...]

[...]

The worst thing is when both height and width tags are modified, which alters the original image's aspect ratio, resulting in monstrosities like this:



I tend to eliminate one of the two so that the aspect ratio will automatically adjust to whichever one (of the two) I am setting.

[...]

That's the way to do it. I tend to keep width and remove height, and always use powers of 2 (or multiples thereof) as the number of pixels, for...reasons.


[...]

Ha.

I AM a small solid breast guy but that woman does have quite a chest

not a woman...AI image..check the nails.

Correct. Was about to say this. It's an AI's poor attempt at keeping knuckle count at 5. And it's one of the ugliest women (AI or otherwise) that I've even seen. Pictured in a church, of all places!


The illiteracy in this thread today is shocking 😲

The more they are fed, the more they will come...
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
Pages:
Jump to: