PSA: Nietzsche did drugs only because he had severe and
painful chronic health problems—and the drugs
burnt out his brain, leaving him as an invalid lunatic for the last decade of his life!
Drugs were the tragedy of Nietzsche’s downfall. nutildah is despicable—“WTF!?”-tier brain-damaged, ignorant, hallucinatory druggie
scum, listing Nietzsche as an example of how drugs are just so cool. And although I don’t usually question people’s merit-sending, it is
very clear in this case that suchmoon is such a lunatic.
Merited by suchmoon (4), strawbs (2), vapourminer (1), 600watt (1), sirazimuth (1), P_Shep (1), soullyG (1), OutOfMemory (1)warning: nullius-sized post follows; I tried my best to keep it engaging
[...hallucinatory illogic about how LSD, pot, shrooms, etc. improve your mind oh so much...]
As far as other drugs are concerned, some of the world's most famous inhabitants owe their inventions and works to them.
[...]
Nietzsche - opium addict
[...]
So the idea that doing drugs necessarily burns one's brain out is patently false.
Read a book:I won’t deign seriously to argue with your druggie religion any more than I debate Christian evangelicals.
P.S., to avoid any whining about how I’m oh so much against freedom:
* I must emphasize another point here; for despite my
repeated statements of
my position (n.b. 2017 post), this red herring was thrown at me by WO’s local druggie crowd with their hallucinatory illogic:
Of course, I support and defend people’s right to harm themselves! Including by poisoning themselves with drugs. I just don’t fall for the false dichotomy that either you must support the tyranny of the War on Drugs, or you must pretend that drugs are a mostly harmless, and even beneficial recreation. Say what?
Freedom includes the freedom to commit suicide. My opinion is consistent. This is one of my Newbie posts:Druggies, don’t whine. I am supporting your freedom to kill yourselves!
P.P.S., edit,
obiter dictum—from another author’s preface to the same book—to sum up why I despise democracy:
Nietzsche may have been right, therefore he may be unsuccessful. [...] ...the driving power behind democracy is not a political one, it is religious—it is Christianity.
[...]
There [Napoleon] was another victim of democracy... The mighty sword in the beginning and the mighty pen at the end of the last century [1800s] were alike impotent against—Fate.