Yes and no.
It would of course be ideal to achieve "herd immunity" but there are downsides of the procedure as well as the problem of mutation.
Like the flu, you can't actually get herd immunity, and it also does a lot of damage to the economy because of people lying sick at home, not able to work.
Herd immunity against the current circulating strains of SARS2, yes. Herd immunity forever? No. This comes at a price of taking out some % of global economic power, and it also has to be a global approach, because how could you explain country A to let people in from country B, who for example are currently herd immunizing, bringing in high infection/spreading rates? Just as a simple example of global covid complexity.
Covid is still seen too much as a national problem. It's in fact a global one, in a globalized economy, many people don't see this.
We'll have to swallow, either way. There seems to be no "best practice" for all of us.
I'm only replying to you because i think you're one of the sane members on board of the WO ship
I'll back off the discussion as soon as polarization or covid-denial posts show up
Definitely yes. I watched the whole thing, so I'll just dismiss your post, doctor.
Btw, it's a political problem. World wide social & political problem. And I surely don't deny it, nor swallow.
Yep because people choose to believe that it is political it then becomes political.
BTW it would all be solved if people simple stopped fucking for about a decade.
Once there are no babies people would start to become valuable as a limited resource much like BTC is non inflationary.
Just think as a human the single best action you can do is have any kind of sex, but intercourse. Solves many of the worlds problems. Actually gives power to the people not the politicians or big business.
Can you imagine the world population shrinking to a sustainable size and every simply having a lot of fun sex?
The chances of that are the chances of me picking a key at random and finding a 10 btc address.
