Do not forget that SwayStar wanted to deplatform WO as an “extremely toxic community”.* Quote-unquote.* Original topic title: “Should Bitcoin Wall Observer thread be deleted?” SwayStar later edited the title and OP only to call for merits to be disabled in WO.I always comport myself as a gentleman, and I suggest that others do likewise. I think that I am also well on record as communicating professionally with
the few females who are interested in technical or financial topics, who are here for that purpose, and who behave themselves as mature adults instead of tantrum-throwing toddlers.
Whereas I read CryptoTourist as giving a big fuck-you to deplatforming, to cancel culture—to the notion that
more than twenty-seven thousand pages of forum posts should be memory-holed because someone Got Offended On The Internet.
Here, honey, have a dose of “toxic”. No, you can’t delete it. This forum does not have a “Code of Conduct”, a “Trust and Safety Team”, or other features of a padded playpen. Anyway, that was
my take on it.
Accordingly, sirazimuth can go skullfuck himself with a dildo sculpted from his own sanctimonious bullshit.
I am using uncharacteristic expletives for a reason.
For the record. At greater length than before. Because apparently, some people just don’t get it. Sometimes, I need to be less subtle.
On another note...
On Whores and Historical PerspectivePerhaps you may mistake me for a Christian—or for indulging the modern Victorian prudishness which, by no accident, coincided with stupid men’s invention of feminism. Do you suppose that I buy into the Nineteenth Century’s orgy of modern democratic delusions? Given the implausibility that I could be so foolish, I think it’s more probable that you have just never heard the old aristocratic aphorism, stated as to the lower classes, “The whore protects the virtue of the wife.”
Men will fuck women who are not their own wives. That is human nature, on a level that cannot be changed unless humans are replaced by meat-robots
(n.b.). If common prostitutes are unavailable to low-class men who can neither access nor afford mistresses and courtesans, then they will chase each others’ wives, and society will fall apart. To recognize this fact of life is necessary for wise governance—but of course, it would be indiscreet to mention this to the masses who need to be governed.
Oops. Anyway, that is the old-fashioned view; attempts to outright
eradicate prostitution are mostly new to modern democracies steeped in feminist dogmata.
So as for the lower classes.
Moreover, given that you name yourself after Homer, I’d expect that you would recognize my habitual allusions to classy sex in classical antiquity—including my posts with classical and neoclassical statues of Phryne, the hetaera who has inspired poets and artists for millennia. That is neither modern nor degenerate. For example:
I usually don’t label these things. If you neither know, nor seek to know by yourself, then you do not deserve to know. Anyway, this is a statue of Phryne—history’s most famous practitionress of the oldest profession:What, you want a clearer view?
(Do a double-take: Yes, this is a statue.)nullius’ girlfriend
That is a statute of the most famous ancient Greek
ἑταίρᾱν, the cultural equivalent of a classical
gaṇikā.
I must remark but briefly: Phryne was once tried on a criminal charge of blasphemy. As an argument in her defence, her advocate stripped her naked before the tribunal. That was his actual argument: She was too beautiful to be guilty! The Greeks associated physical beauty with moral excellence (and ugliness with wickedness). Phryne was acquitted.
How do you accuse me of hypocrisy?
You need a better dictionary. Preferably one that, among other things, gives etymologies. LOL! A philology joke. There I go being subtle again. I cherish subtlety, because I care.
Edited for clarity.
