Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 7637. (Read 26732435 times)

Yeah you have the right to be a miserable prick.

And we have a right to call you out on it you selfish miserable prick.

I hear it's a great gig with benefits, such as they supply the equipment you'll need to do the job right:

https://twitter.com/64hunblock/status/1266914365355315200
https://twitter.com/JeromeRussell5/status/1267021503100522497
https://twitter.com/benjancewicz/status/1267495959304515591
https://twitter.com/Conserv17716651/status/1267458034273484808
https://twitter.com/DESERTWXLF/status/1267520788476956674
https://twitter.com/KRHogan_NTD/status/1266952860299857921
https://twitter.com/64hunblock/status/1266914365355315200

...and the pay I hear is really good too

https://twitter.com/knows_ernie/status/1267004166528012288

Fair enough assessment that we could have a break out to $12k in the coming 4-6 weeks, in the event that we do not break down to sub $8k-ish...


Exactly... get some tingling going.  #metoo.

Found the one about London, more of a protest than a riot it seems. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8372847/Black-Lives-Matter-protesters-streets-London.html

Cant't find the links now, it was in one of the many news sites I read in the morning, I've been looking through them but can't find it now. I'll post them if I stumble on them again.

https://twitter.com/BarisGibiGez/status/1267519560149807105

You seem to be the newbie in these interactions, irfan_pak10, and you are not really coming close to making any kind of decent or positive impression (so far), which seems to be getting even MOAR worser if you cannot even recognize various likely credible players in a match in which you seem to be preparing for battle.

And, surely there are several WO thread regulars who have quite a bit of tolerance for goofballs and nonsense (I would include infofront in that relatively tolerant group), so it is NOT too likely to work out very well for you (in my sorcery proclamation attempts regarding your future here....hahahahahaha), if you cannot even come close to recognizing and/or appreciating those members who are more likely to stick up for your seemingly underwhelming ramblings.    

 



in other words, no hat for you......  



Exactly!!!  No need to even hide around the corner, since face-melting^tm chicken legs do not even matter on the interwebs.   

There is a pretty big fallacy if you try to equate all government agencies and also attempt to remove both individualism or levels of ability to exercise discretion both in the scope of the carrying out of government/job/professional duties and their individual discretion in that regard.

Of course, you can attempt to apply various amounts of game theory, group psychology, internal dynamics of any particular government agency, including attempting to determine which government agencies are at issue in the action (or lack of action or abuse of power/discretion that you are proclaiming to be at issue), yet in the end, you are likely to engage in vary sloppy thinking (even if you happen to get your conclusions right from time to time) if you lump all motivations in terms of government versus non-government.

Coroners are probably not too likely to be coerced or unduly influenced by other state actors such as policemen or prosecutors, but surely there could be some coincidental leanings of the Coroner in this case that favors police, etc.  Sure, that is possible, and Coroners are people too and may even have some political biases and opinions that are less than objective.

 In that regard, it seems that Floyd's family request to get an assessment from another coroner of their choosing could be of value to them and to the public, and surely the family (and even the public) should have the right to get such second opinion assessment in a case like this (and surely the family should be able to choose, too, because presumptively the family would choose a second opinion specialist (Coroner) that they believe to be sufficiently detached from local police or in other ways to be perceived as not biased in this case).

 Furthermore, there might be a question of additional costs, so it may be reasonable for the family to have to bear such additional costs of getting such second opinion (to the extent that extra costs might be an issue), but costs should not be a reason for their not being able to get a second opinion in a case that seems to be so inflammatory as this, including the fact that the preliminary results seem to be contrary to what visually seemed to be more likely to have been happening (or the consequences/impact of the officer's kneeling on Floyd's neck).

meh

had them from work.

edit: speaking for myself obviously. where and why lightfoot got his is his business.

I am not to follow patterns, but boy would I like this to happen.




Source: https://twitter.com/100trillionUSD/status/1267482790523699200

I suspect he could be easily diagnosed with nosophobia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nosophobia

BTW. I observed many RealCovidiots in front of the facts they start screaming and spreading lies of MSM scientific scumbags.They won't refer to facts like mortality statistic. Blind, and obviously stupid people.

Covid19 is just another flue.

No.

It's not a matter of being selfish.
It's a matter of spreading unnecessary fear, FOR NOTHING.

Also it's my fucking right not to be afraid, without dick-fuck-pussies telling me what to do.

Hard to imagine people are still trying to use that stupid argument about the mask. Literally from day one it was clearly explained that you wear a mask primarily for others, not for yourself. At this point to claim otherwise is willful ignorance.

not really. at least around here. not common but no one looks twice either.

P100 in public?  I imagine you get some looks.

The documentation on that box is correct: Cloth masks do not effectively prevent the wearer from getting a virus (I think it's a 20-30% reduction in risk). What they do is prevent the SPREADING of viruses to other people (and they do this very well, >95%).

This is why people who are selfish dick-fucks do not wear masks: Why protect or assist anyone else, I am only concerned about NUMERO UNO! Fortunately not wearing a mask is easy to spot, flags you as that kind of person, and lets people know to stay very far away from you and prevent you from entering their property as necessary.

This is also why I wear a P100 respirator when in close contact with others: It protects others *and* protects me from scumbags who don't wear masks. Unfortunately they are in very limited supply which is why we do option 2 (everyone wears lesser masks).

Make sense?

You see... for you it may be not newsworthy but for some rioters it was enough to wear of mask and do their job. Police "virus" kills about 1000 US citizens a year when Covid19 already killed thousands of them in just 3 months. So where is real danger?

Ok, but to be serious, don't you think that reading this news it could help milions of real covidiots (pictured bellow) who believes that some scientists or medical experts couldn't be simply corrupted (or simply stupid enough) and spread lies as regular propagandists do?



They really wear this mask to protect themselves from virus killer  

Wow, just WOW!

I doubt that cops are being criticized for subduing a person who was resisting arrest, but surely they are being criticized for either the use of excessive force or the impression that they were using excessive force.

Sure, it is possible that in the end, the pressure of the knee on George Floyd's neck did not break anything (or restrict blood flow, or crush the breathing tubes), but still there remains an impression of excessive force because that action seems to have not been necessary, based on other factors (such as other officers being there, Floyd was already handcuffed and other aspects showing that he was not likely a then threat)... so it seemed to have been both excessive, and also there is an impression that the cop(s) might have partially been motivated by treating people from different races disparately (black in this case).  There have been seemingly similar incidents in relatively recent times in the past that did not seem to cause those police officers to improve their conduct (such as through having had received training) and their way of dealing with people that they are interrogating or arresting.

Of course, officers do have duties of care that go beyond merely NOT using excessive force, but even though they could be accused of not carrying out proper duties of care, too, officers frequently do seem to get away with NOT rendering medical care, CPR, or even more basic levels of care such as safeguarding persons in their custody when they have actually been trained in how to carry out those kinds of duties of care things, and in a time like this (with the virus and everything like that), I doubt that the officers would be held to those higher levels of duties of care, such as rendering CPR (or otherwise potentially exposing themselves to Floyd or any other person)... so a lot of the public outrage remains to be more about what they did  (and the images and impressions of such actions) rather than what they failed to do.  


No.  You have shown yourself to be pretty retarded through a lot of your posts, so it would not be reasonable to attempt to portray yourself as having any kinds of superiorities.. .that would be very misleading....... There seems to be a kind of Dunning-Kruger effect going on in your particular situation.    


Oh gawd!!!!!   two arm-chaired "intelligence assessment" experts feeding off of one another.