Do you see evidence of the computer in the printing press?
Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 9462. (Read 26707498 times)
September 07, 2019, 11:43:31 AM
September 07, 2019, 11:39:22 AM
There's a lot of evidence that Segwit is the alteration. Read the docs, the white paper
The same evidence that CSW is satoshi?WTF are you on about? How could evidence of personal identity have anything whatsoever to do with evidence of protocol change?
Quote
I'm not sure if you're trolling or trying to be serious.
Back at ya.
See any evidence of SegWit in the white paper? No?
Explicitly in front of your face. Willful dereliction of truthiness.
SegWit was indeed an alteration of the Bitcoin protocol. Undeniably. There is really no way to argue otherwise.
September 07, 2019, 11:34:32 AM
Here you got my last Merit.
Put that half sMerit at good use!
September 07, 2019, 11:30:57 AM
saying that segwit is not bitcoin is the same like saying TCP is not IP. it's the same, but it's another layer. TCP can't exist without IP and segwit can't exist without bitcoin.
Not sure you realize what you are saying here. IP certainly does exist independent of any TCP layer. By (your egregiously flawed) analogy, bitcoin certainly does exists independent of any SegWit. Indeed, without recourse to any analogy, bitcoin doth exist independent of SegWit. Remember -- "soft" fork? "Not" mandatory?
September 07, 2019, 11:27:53 AM
Btc/Usd
For the short term i'm watching the yellow EMA line, which currently acts as a support on the 4h chart. The 4h candle closed above it. Currently the yellow line is around 10.270 Usd. If it stays above it will be bullish. If not we will find other support.
You sound undeniably correct.
BTC's price is going to go down until it stops going down, and if it does not stop going down where it should stop, then BTC's price is going to go down more.
I have learned a lot about bitcoin and about myself from such observations.
The chart helps to make that point, too.. Comes off as more professional. I don't know about you but i buy on the support bounce. So i bought some back. If it reaches my target between 10.800 and 11.000 i sold 3 times already there. Yes it goes up and down but i tell where is the support (buy) and where resistance (sell). If it goes bellow support it means sell. (well i trade only 20% of my holdings, i never sell all.) Trader has to be prepared for both ways.
...This time, around, I don't really care, and I am fine with just continuing to follow my system that only sells small amounts on the way up and also buys back on the way down in intervals that are reasonable for me, and the tweaking this time around is to spread the intervals even more than they had been the first time around, but otherwise I am largely keeping with my system because I like it..
So, yeah a week or two ago, in our run up to a bit above $11k, I made several sales on the way up, and bought back at various points between about $10k and $9,400, and in this last run up to nearly $11k, I had a few BTC sell orders trigger, so the more that triggered, the higher my buy back points are. I have sell orders on different exchanges so some of them triggered and some of them did not, but so far in this particular most recent correction, from today, NONE of my BTC buy back orders have triggered yet, and most of them are set for a little bit below $10k.
In my earlier days, I would have had both my BTC buy orders and my BTC sell orders more tightly structured; however, these days I am more happy with larger intervals and my goal and recent practice has been to increase and increase and increase the integers in which such orders are triggered.
Another way of conceptualizing my strategy towards my BTC holdings has been to attempt to create my BTC buy/sell orders in such a way that I am largely NOT too much attached to price direction.. neither psychologically nor financially.
Of course, I profit more from upwards BTC price movements, but it is also in my thinking that inevitably in the longer term BTC's price is much more likely to go up than it is to go down, but in the meantime, I am profiting from volatility in such a way that it causes me to become less and less concerned about BTC's price going down.
Also, I have a plan that is projected into the future of starting to liquidate 1% of the value of my BTC stash per quarter, so long as the BTC price is not below $5k, and I am thinking that I will start to employ that particular plan in a few years, and I think that there are real decent chances that the BTC price is not going to go below $5k in the coming years or to interfere with my tentative liquidation plan, and if BTC's price does go below $5k, then I will just plan to hold off on cashing out my 1% during any such quarters that the BTC price does go below $5k, if such periods of low BTC price performance were to come, once I start my liquidation plan.
The strategy of constantly selling and buying has one weakness: it produces LOTS of tax obligations during periods of fast btc growth.
Theoretically, if someone was selling extensively, then re-buying in 2017, then watching btc declining to 3k while having serious tax obligations resulting in a need to a selling of the additional chunk at a suboptimal (low) price.
Of course, this would not be the case when ample cash is available to pay the tax.
In other words, in high taxing environment, this strategy might backfire.
On the other hand, trying to sell at the top could be a difficult undertaking as well. The local top is currently projected (by various authors) to be anywhere between 30K and 400K. Tough choice.
HM here favors 180K (don't know where the number came from, maybe just personal preference).
My current feel is to allocate certain % for a sale, then sell once a personal preference is set in 1/10 fractions of the final number of btc sells. I intend to sell only up to 20% of my btc at the next ATH, knowing fully well that the rest would probably correct to 20% of the value. Why? Because I don't want to lose my position due to unforeseen price trajectory changes (like a double peak of 2013)..
September 07, 2019, 11:27:26 AM
I expect/hope 12K to be broken next week.
No.
11k is too hard to break.
We got too close and look what happened.
God no more four digit figures.
Surely we are getting within striking distance of 4 digits, but is this merely a fake out? I would not proclaim to know, even though the BAKKT seems to be bullish in terms of what would seem to need to be extra demands on actual BTC supply - plus of course, another route for institutional money to more easily and justifiably get a bit of BTC stake.
Further price fall in this weekend or this is going to be bullish again?
We are stuck in a band between 9,300 and 11,300. It’s a bit irrelevant where it goes in that band it’ll bounce all over the place. What’s important is whether it breaks up or down.
80% chance we will eventually break upwards.
Anyway I am not selling anything in the near future but I am worried that whenever I invest on the bitcoin there is sudden dump immediately.
Am I the most unluckiest man in this world?
You are here, so you are very lucky (as are we).
You just need to shift your mindset to a minimum of five years.
Yes. Exactly. Even if I don't really agree with assigning an 80% probability of an upside breakout, in the short term, in the end, it might not matter too much.
If anyone is worried about whether the break out is going to be up or down or the assignment of probabilities should be 58% or 80% to the upside, then you have not spent enough time accumulating and dollar cost averaging which in any 5 year time frame has very decent chances to being up rather than down or flat... which seems to be one of the reasons that bitcoin remains one of the best investments currently in terms of both hedging and having a decent asymmetric bet (to the upside, of course).
The vast majority of us should realize that there are no guarantees, and also that we don't want to become over-reliant or over-invested in one direction, such as up, even though such upward direction continues to have very decent probabilities of happening... but even with "very decent probabilities of up," that still is far from a guarantee.
September 07, 2019, 11:26:34 AM
Have given my last 2 to @fillippone and @Toxic2040
Have a good evening brothers.....
Mic has to run, f00d and b00z are calling me out of my seat
Have a good evening brothers.....
Mic has to run, f00d and b00z are calling me out of my seat
September 07, 2019, 11:23:33 AM
oh noes
mah trust
mah trust
September 07, 2019, 11:19:29 AM
Good morning
Beating into a short choppy sea with more squalls on the horizon. The storm jib is out and we have 3 reefs in the main. Steady as she goes.
4h
D
Beating into a short choppy sea with more squalls on the horizon. The storm jib is out and we have 3 reefs in the main. Steady as she goes.
4h
D
September 07, 2019, 11:10:30 AM
It's time (again) for a Wall Observer Meta Post!
I made this post Monthly, so it will consider the merits sent during the month of August.
So I had to wait for the last merit dum, that included the last day of the month.
Merit analysis based on LoyceV merit file: http://loyce.club/Merit/merit.all.txt
Merit updated to August,31th, 2019 23:59:59 UTC
Total merits sent on WO: 28720
Monthly Merits sent on WO: 1127 (-)
Merited Users: 599 (+16)
TOP 100 WO MERIT RECEIVERS:
TOP 100 WO MERIT SENDERS:
TOP 100 MONTHLY WO RECEIVERS:
1.micgoossens 100
2.VB1001 82
3.fillippone 68
4.HairyMaclairy 58
5.LFC_Bitcoin 52
6.SuperTA 45
7.mindrust 41
8.nutildah 40
9.bkbirge 38
10.JSRAW 31
11.ivomm 26
12.JayJuanGee 25
13.Toxic2040 24
14.Lambie Slayer 24
15.jojo69 23
16.jbreher 22
17.makrospex 18
18.Cryptotourist 17
19.kurious 16
20.bitcoinPsycho 16
21.xhomerx10 13
22.Globb0 13
23.JimboToronto 13
24.600watt 13
25.AlcoHoDL 13
26.Wilhelm 13
27.Paashaas 12
28.BobLawblaw 10
29.gentlemand 10
30.vroom 10
31.Pamoldar 10
32.lightfoot 10
33.sirazimuth 10
34.Elwar 9
35.Biodom 8
36.Hueristic 8
37.Krubster 8
38.Raja_MBZ 7
39.vapourminer 7
40.GeoRW 7
41.cAPSLOCK 6
42.slocker 6
43.d_eddie 5
44.Searing 5
45.STT 5
46.somac. 5
47.Majormax 5
48.GreatArkansas 5
49._javi_ 5
50.jupiter9 5
51.Last of the V8s 4
52.Spaceman_Spiff_Original 4
53.Dunkelheit667 4
54.Saint-loup 4
55.Negotiation 4
56.hd49728 4
57.Torque 3
58.Phil_S 3
59.Icygreen 3
60.Karartma1 3
61.BitcoinNewsMagazine 3
62.hodl_2015 3
63.Millionero 3
64.infofront 2
65.realr0ach 2
66.serveria.com 2
67.DeathAngel 2
68.nanobtc 2
69.gembitz 2
70.DaRude 2
71.windjc 2
72.soxxx 2
73.gallianooo 2
74.btcbeliever 2
75.degxtra1 2
76.aesma 2
77.Bossian 2
78.bitserve 1
79.bones261 1
80.Wekkel 1
81.Arriemoller 1
82.Dabs 1
83.Totscha 1
84.RoomBot 1
85.Ludwig Von 1
86.fabiorem 1
87.criptix 1
88.Syke 1
89.P_Shep 1
90.erre 1
91.smartcomet 1
92.GrosWesh 1
93.rdbase 1
94.Febo 1
95.dyask 1
96.g-uid 1
97.kronos123 1
98.Lucius 1
99.NeuroticFish 1
TOP 100 MONTHLY WO SENDERS
1.JayJuanGee 155
2.micgoossens 151
3.LFC_Bitcoin 60
4.fillippone 46
5.vapourminer 44
6.mindrust 41
7.VB1001 37
8.Globb0 35
9.600watt 35
10.jbreher 30
11.Dabs 30
12.BobLawblaw 26
13.bones261 24
14.SuperTA 24
15.Wilhelm 20
16.infofront 19
17.HairyMaclairy 19
18.Lambie Slayer 19
19.Toxic2040 18
20.nutildah 16
21.ssmc2 14
22.bkbirge 14
23.Hueristic 13
24.ivomm 13
25.Paashaas 11
26.jojo69 10
27.JSRAW 9
28.xhomerx10 8
29.Pamoldar 8
30.kingcolex 8
31.bitcoinPsycho 8
32.Negotiation 8
33.Cryptotourist 7
34.makrospex 7
35.cAPSLOCK 6
36.Raja_MBZ 6
37.lightfoot 6
38.Torque 5
39.JimboToronto 5
40.Phil_S 5
41.AlcoHoDL 5
42.GreatArkansas 5
43.kurious 4
44.Biodom 4
45.sirazimuth 4
46.Icygreen 4
47.vroom 4
48.DeathAngel 4
49.d_eddie 3
50.Dunkelheit667 3
51.mfort312 3
52.Ludwig Von 3
53._javi_ 3
54.Krubster 3
55.Ibian 2
56.ErisDiscordia 2
57.Majormax 2
58.somac. 2
59.BinaryReign 2
60.Syke 2
61.rdbase 2
62.BitcoinNewsMagazine 2
63.GrosWesh 2
64.o_e_l_e_o 2
65.NeuroticFish 2
66.Woodie 2
67.WastedLTC 2
68.Dux2K 2
69.g-uid 2
70.wildduck 2
71.gentlemand 1
72.bitebits 1
73.STT 1
74.serveria.com 1
75.ChinkyEyes 1
76.HI-TEC99 1
77.fluidjax 1
78.Saint-loup 1
79.tmfp 1
80.actmyname 1
81.degxtra1 1
82.rebal15 1
83.BayAreaCoins 1
84.blink 1
85.Daniel91 1
86.Dotto 1
87.dkbit98 1
88.chimk 1
89.tranthidung 1
90.hd49728 1
91.Rikafip 1
92.bakasabo 1
93.mr_random 1
MONTHLY sMERITS BALANCE
Positive Balance means an user has been increasing sMerits on the WO thread, while negative numbers means the users has sent more merits on WO than received.
Negative numbers are possible or because he has been generous this week because he has been greedy past weeks (so only temporary imbalance), or because he has hoarded sMerits on other threads spending them on WO thread, or because he's a merit source.
TOP 20 MONTHLY NET RECEIVERS
TOP 20 MONTHLY WO NET SENDERS
Nice update, I think monthly cadence is more insightful, as less prone to weekly imbalances due to MS drought (mic, I do hear you).
Sadly, It a little bit delayed update, but I commit doing those as soon as sir LoyceV releases data dumps.
Still fixing glitches here and there, I am using this to getting better at data management (errors are mine).
I made this post Monthly, so it will consider the merits sent during the month of August.
So I had to wait for the last merit dum, that included the last day of the month.
Merit analysis based on LoyceV merit file: http://loyce.club/Merit/merit.all.txt
Merit updated to August,31th, 2019 23:59:59 UTC
Total merits sent on WO: 28720
Monthly Merits sent on WO: 1127 (-)
Merited Users: 599 (+16)
TOP 100 WO MERIT RECEIVERS:
Code:
1.micgoossens 1833
2.Last of the V8s 1574
3.HairyMaclairy 1225
4.xhomerx10 1138
5.Toxic2040 934
6.BobLawblaw 921
7.jojo69 812
8.infofront 713
9.JayJuanGee 700
10.LFC_Bitcoin 671
11.VB1001 513
12.d_eddie 513
13.Torque 498
14.bitserve 474
15.gentlemand 391
16.Paashaas 375
17.mindrust 352
18.Elwar 352
19.kenzawak 342
20.Globb0 328
21.cAPSLOCK 294
22.JimboToronto 291
23.mfort312 282
24.fillippone 275
25.jbreher 263
26.Raja_MBZ 258
27.Lambie Slayer 255
28.ivomm 253
29.kurious 251
30.BTCMILLIONAIRE 247
31.goldkingcoiner 247
32.Rosewater Foundation 244
33.Biodom 237
34.nutildah 212
35.Phil_S 197
36.realr0ach 196
37.TERA2 194
38.JSRAW 192
39.bones261 184
40.600watt 182
41.Ibian 180
42.vroom 177
43.kingcolex 172
44.Kylapoiss 169
45.Icygreen 162
46.marcus_of_augustus 156
47.yefi 153
48.Hueristic 149
49.Wekkel 138
50.Pamoldar 138
51.Arriemoller 135
52.StartupAnalyst 130
53.Cryptotourist 130
54.toknormal 129
55.Spaceman_Spiff_Original 123
56.bitcoinPsycho 122
57.Anon136 121
58.Dabs 114
59.vapourminer 113
60.kirreev070 107
61.BinaryReign 105
62.AlcoHoDL 102
63.lightfoot 98
64.explorer 97
65.Bitcoinaire 95
66.Searing 88
67.serveria.com 86
68.sirazimuth 82
69.Cryptoqueeen 81
70.STT 77
71.somac. 72
72.BlindMayorBitcorn 72
73.HI-TEC99 71
74.Gyrsur 69
75.cryptjh 68
76.Majormax 67
77.Totscha 66
78.pacman7331 66
79.cannycassiopeia 64
80.DeathAngel 64
81.bitebits 63
82.conspirosphere.tk 63
83.nanobtc 59
84.Karartma1 59
85.crypmike 58
86.suchmoon 56
87.strawbs 54
88.Samarkand 54
89.BitcoinNewsMagazine 54
90.theymos 53
91.FractalUniverse 53
92.RoomBot 52
93.bkbirge 52
94.rolling 51
95.RayX12 50
96.fluidjax 50
97.Ludwig Von 48
98.gembitz 48
99.encycrypto 48
100.Speculatoross 47
2.Last of the V8s 1574
3.HairyMaclairy 1225
4.xhomerx10 1138
5.Toxic2040 934
6.BobLawblaw 921
7.jojo69 812
8.infofront 713
9.JayJuanGee 700
10.LFC_Bitcoin 671
11.VB1001 513
12.d_eddie 513
13.Torque 498
14.bitserve 474
15.gentlemand 391
16.Paashaas 375
17.mindrust 352
18.Elwar 352
19.kenzawak 342
20.Globb0 328
21.cAPSLOCK 294
22.JimboToronto 291
23.mfort312 282
24.fillippone 275
25.jbreher 263
26.Raja_MBZ 258
27.Lambie Slayer 255
28.ivomm 253
29.kurious 251
30.BTCMILLIONAIRE 247
31.goldkingcoiner 247
32.Rosewater Foundation 244
33.Biodom 237
34.nutildah 212
35.Phil_S 197
36.realr0ach 196
37.TERA2 194
38.JSRAW 192
39.bones261 184
40.600watt 182
41.Ibian 180
42.vroom 177
43.kingcolex 172
44.Kylapoiss 169
45.Icygreen 162
46.marcus_of_augustus 156
47.yefi 153
48.Hueristic 149
49.Wekkel 138
50.Pamoldar 138
51.Arriemoller 135
52.StartupAnalyst 130
53.Cryptotourist 130
54.toknormal 129
55.Spaceman_Spiff_Original 123
56.bitcoinPsycho 122
57.Anon136 121
58.Dabs 114
59.vapourminer 113
60.kirreev070 107
61.BinaryReign 105
62.AlcoHoDL 102
63.lightfoot 98
64.explorer 97
65.Bitcoinaire 95
66.Searing 88
67.serveria.com 86
68.sirazimuth 82
69.Cryptoqueeen 81
70.STT 77
71.somac. 72
72.BlindMayorBitcorn 72
73.HI-TEC99 71
74.Gyrsur 69
75.cryptjh 68
76.Majormax 67
77.Totscha 66
78.pacman7331 66
79.cannycassiopeia 64
80.DeathAngel 64
81.bitebits 63
82.conspirosphere.tk 63
83.nanobtc 59
84.Karartma1 59
85.crypmike 58
86.suchmoon 56
87.strawbs 54
88.Samarkand 54
89.BitcoinNewsMagazine 54
90.theymos 53
91.FractalUniverse 53
92.RoomBot 52
93.bkbirge 52
94.rolling 51
95.RayX12 50
96.fluidjax 50
97.Ludwig Von 48
98.gembitz 48
99.encycrypto 48
100.Speculatoross 47
TOP 100 WO MERIT SENDERS:
Code:
1.JayJuanGee 2478
2.BobLawblaw 1965
3.micgoossens 1462
4.LFC_Bitcoin 1129
5.bones261 1057
6.infofront 994
7.Last of the V8s 786
8.Globb0 758
9.jbreher 728
10.xhomerx10 691
11.vapourminer 662
12.mindrust 628
13.HairyMaclairy 602
14.cAPSLOCK 554
15.600watt 539
16.marcus_of_augustus 502
17.Toxic2040 429
18.jojo69 393
19.Torque 345
20.Paashaas 329
21.QuestionAuthority 311
22.Hueristic 284
23.d_eddie 273
24.yefi 256
25.Dabs 254
26.VB1001 248
27.bitserve 245
28.kurious 229
29.BlindMayorBitcorn 209
30.gentlemand 208
31.Ibian 207
32.Wekkel 205
33.ErisDiscordia 202
34.kenzawak 191
35.bitebits 188
36.suchmoon 186
37.RoomBot 180
38.Karartma1 179
39.JimboToronto 157
40.explorer 155
41.Raja_MBZ 154
42.nutildah 152
43.fillippone 151
44.Dunkelheit667 146
45.mfort312 145
46.Gyrsur 144
47.Lambie Slayer 128
48.Pamoldar 126
49.ivomm 124
50.kingcolex 123
51.ssmc2 120
52.BTCMILLIONAIRE 118
53.Rosewater Foundation 116
54.edgar 115
55.Searing 113
56.goldkingcoiner 110
57.Majormax 108
58.Arriemoller 105
59.PoolMinor 101
60.xyzzy099 99
61.Biodom 97
62.lightfoot 95
63.P_Shep 91
64.tonyq 87
65.julian071 86
66.Phil_S 85
67.sirazimuth 84
68.Icygreen 83
69.conspirosphere.tk 82
70.JSRAW 82
71.Kylapoiss 81
72.vroom 76
73.RayX12 73
74.criptix 73
75.Elwar 72
76.DeathAngel 71
77.bitcoinPsycho 65
78.Cryptotourist 65
79.StartupAnalyst 60
80.Anon136 56
81.empowering 55
82.rolling 52
83.AlcoHoDL 51
84.Jayjay04 50
85.sammy007 50
86.soullyG 49
87.STT 48
88.FractalUniverse 48
89.mymenace 46
90.MrFreeRoMan 45
91.Bitcoinaire 44
92.AlexGR 43
93.Totscha 42
94.serveria.com 42
95.afbitcoins 40
96.nanobtc 38
97.flynn 37
98.somac. 37
99.fabiorem 37
100.MirkoIta 36
2.BobLawblaw 1965
3.micgoossens 1462
4.LFC_Bitcoin 1129
5.bones261 1057
6.infofront 994
7.Last of the V8s 786
8.Globb0 758
9.jbreher 728
10.xhomerx10 691
11.vapourminer 662
12.mindrust 628
13.HairyMaclairy 602
14.cAPSLOCK 554
15.600watt 539
16.marcus_of_augustus 502
17.Toxic2040 429
18.jojo69 393
19.Torque 345
20.Paashaas 329
21.QuestionAuthority 311
22.Hueristic 284
23.d_eddie 273
24.yefi 256
25.Dabs 254
26.VB1001 248
27.bitserve 245
28.kurious 229
29.BlindMayorBitcorn 209
30.gentlemand 208
31.Ibian 207
32.Wekkel 205
33.ErisDiscordia 202
34.kenzawak 191
35.bitebits 188
36.suchmoon 186
37.RoomBot 180
38.Karartma1 179
39.JimboToronto 157
40.explorer 155
41.Raja_MBZ 154
42.nutildah 152
43.fillippone 151
44.Dunkelheit667 146
45.mfort312 145
46.Gyrsur 144
47.Lambie Slayer 128
48.Pamoldar 126
49.ivomm 124
50.kingcolex 123
51.ssmc2 120
52.BTCMILLIONAIRE 118
53.Rosewater Foundation 116
54.edgar 115
55.Searing 113
56.goldkingcoiner 110
57.Majormax 108
58.Arriemoller 105
59.PoolMinor 101
60.xyzzy099 99
61.Biodom 97
62.lightfoot 95
63.P_Shep 91
64.tonyq 87
65.julian071 86
66.Phil_S 85
67.sirazimuth 84
68.Icygreen 83
69.conspirosphere.tk 82
70.JSRAW 82
71.Kylapoiss 81
72.vroom 76
73.RayX12 73
74.criptix 73
75.Elwar 72
76.DeathAngel 71
77.bitcoinPsycho 65
78.Cryptotourist 65
79.StartupAnalyst 60
80.Anon136 56
81.empowering 55
82.rolling 52
83.AlcoHoDL 51
84.Jayjay04 50
85.sammy007 50
86.soullyG 49
87.STT 48
88.FractalUniverse 48
89.mymenace 46
90.MrFreeRoMan 45
91.Bitcoinaire 44
92.AlexGR 43
93.Totscha 42
94.serveria.com 42
95.afbitcoins 40
96.nanobtc 38
97.flynn 37
98.somac. 37
99.fabiorem 37
100.MirkoIta 36
TOP 100 MONTHLY WO RECEIVERS:
Code:
1.micgoossens 100
2.VB1001 82
3.fillippone 68
4.HairyMaclairy 58
5.LFC_Bitcoin 52
6.SuperTA 45
7.mindrust 41
8.nutildah 40
9.bkbirge 38
10.JSRAW 31
11.ivomm 26
12.JayJuanGee 25
13.Toxic2040 24
14.Lambie Slayer 24
15.jojo69 23
16.jbreher 22
17.makrospex 18
18.Cryptotourist 17
19.kurious 16
20.bitcoinPsycho 16
21.xhomerx10 13
22.Globb0 13
23.JimboToronto 13
24.600watt 13
25.AlcoHoDL 13
26.Wilhelm 13
27.Paashaas 12
28.BobLawblaw 10
29.gentlemand 10
30.vroom 10
31.Pamoldar 10
32.lightfoot 10
33.sirazimuth 10
34.Elwar 9
35.Biodom 8
36.Hueristic 8
37.Krubster 8
38.Raja_MBZ 7
39.vapourminer 7
40.GeoRW 7
41.cAPSLOCK 6
42.slocker 6
43.d_eddie 5
44.Searing 5
45.STT 5
46.somac. 5
47.Majormax 5
48.GreatArkansas 5
49._javi_ 5
50.jupiter9 5
51.Last of the V8s 4
52.Spaceman_Spiff_Original 4
53.Dunkelheit667 4
54.Saint-loup 4
55.Negotiation 4
56.hd49728 4
57.Torque 3
58.Phil_S 3
59.Icygreen 3
60.Karartma1 3
61.BitcoinNewsMagazine 3
62.hodl_2015 3
63.Millionero 3
64.infofront 2
65.realr0ach 2
66.serveria.com 2
67.DeathAngel 2
68.nanobtc 2
69.gembitz 2
70.DaRude 2
71.windjc 2
72.soxxx 2
73.gallianooo 2
74.btcbeliever 2
75.degxtra1 2
76.aesma 2
77.Bossian 2
78.bitserve 1
79.bones261 1
80.Wekkel 1
81.Arriemoller 1
82.Dabs 1
83.Totscha 1
84.RoomBot 1
85.Ludwig Von 1
86.fabiorem 1
87.criptix 1
88.Syke 1
89.P_Shep 1
90.erre 1
91.smartcomet 1
92.GrosWesh 1
93.rdbase 1
94.Febo 1
95.dyask 1
96.g-uid 1
97.kronos123 1
98.Lucius 1
99.NeuroticFish 1
TOP 100 MONTHLY WO SENDERS
Code:
1.JayJuanGee 155
2.micgoossens 151
3.LFC_Bitcoin 60
4.fillippone 46
5.vapourminer 44
6.mindrust 41
7.VB1001 37
8.Globb0 35
9.600watt 35
10.jbreher 30
11.Dabs 30
12.BobLawblaw 26
13.bones261 24
14.SuperTA 24
15.Wilhelm 20
16.infofront 19
17.HairyMaclairy 19
18.Lambie Slayer 19
19.Toxic2040 18
20.nutildah 16
21.ssmc2 14
22.bkbirge 14
23.Hueristic 13
24.ivomm 13
25.Paashaas 11
26.jojo69 10
27.JSRAW 9
28.xhomerx10 8
29.Pamoldar 8
30.kingcolex 8
31.bitcoinPsycho 8
32.Negotiation 8
33.Cryptotourist 7
34.makrospex 7
35.cAPSLOCK 6
36.Raja_MBZ 6
37.lightfoot 6
38.Torque 5
39.JimboToronto 5
40.Phil_S 5
41.AlcoHoDL 5
42.GreatArkansas 5
43.kurious 4
44.Biodom 4
45.sirazimuth 4
46.Icygreen 4
47.vroom 4
48.DeathAngel 4
49.d_eddie 3
50.Dunkelheit667 3
51.mfort312 3
52.Ludwig Von 3
53._javi_ 3
54.Krubster 3
55.Ibian 2
56.ErisDiscordia 2
57.Majormax 2
58.somac. 2
59.BinaryReign 2
60.Syke 2
61.rdbase 2
62.BitcoinNewsMagazine 2
63.GrosWesh 2
64.o_e_l_e_o 2
65.NeuroticFish 2
66.Woodie 2
67.WastedLTC 2
68.Dux2K 2
69.g-uid 2
70.wildduck 2
71.gentlemand 1
72.bitebits 1
73.STT 1
74.serveria.com 1
75.ChinkyEyes 1
76.HI-TEC99 1
77.fluidjax 1
78.Saint-loup 1
79.tmfp 1
80.actmyname 1
81.degxtra1 1
82.rebal15 1
83.BayAreaCoins 1
84.blink 1
85.Daniel91 1
86.Dotto 1
87.dkbit98 1
88.chimk 1
89.tranthidung 1
90.hd49728 1
91.Rikafip 1
92.bakasabo 1
93.mr_random 1
MONTHLY sMERITS BALANCE
Code:
SMerits Balance=Received Merits/2-Sent Merits
Positive Balance means an user has been increasing sMerits on the WO thread, while negative numbers means the users has sent more merits on WO than received.
Negative numbers are possible or because he has been generous this week because he has been greedy past weeks (so only temporary imbalance), or because he has hoarded sMerits on other threads spending them on WO thread, or because he's a merit source.
TOP 20 MONTHLY NET RECEIVERS
Code:
1.HairyMaclairy 10
2.JSRAW 6.5
3.bkbirge 5
4.Elwar 4.5
5.gentlemand 4
6.kurious 4
7.nutildah 4
8.VB1001 4
9.Searing 2.5
10.Last of the V8s 2
11.makrospex 2
12.Spaceman_Spiff_Original 2
13.AlcoHoDL 1.5
14.Cryptotourist 1.5
15.hodl_2015 1.5
16.JimboToronto 1.5
17.jojo69 1.5
18.Karartma1 1.5
19.STT 1.5
20.aesma 1
2.JSRAW 6.5
3.bkbirge 5
4.Elwar 4.5
5.gentlemand 4
6.kurious 4
7.nutildah 4
8.VB1001 4
9.Searing 2.5
10.Last of the V8s 2
11.makrospex 2
12.Spaceman_Spiff_Original 2
13.AlcoHoDL 1.5
14.Cryptotourist 1.5
15.hodl_2015 1.5
16.JimboToronto 1.5
17.jojo69 1.5
18.Karartma1 1.5
19.STT 1.5
20.aesma 1
TOP 20 MONTHLY WO NET SENDERS
Code:
1.JayJuanGee -142.5
2.micgoossens -101
3.vapourminer -40.5
4.LFC_Bitcoin -34
5.Dabs -29.5
6.600watt -28.5
7.Globb0 -28.5
8.bones261 -23.5
9.BobLawblaw -21
10.mindrust -20.5
11.jbreher -19
12.infofront -18
13.ssmc2 -14
14.Wilhelm -13.5
15.fillippone -12
16.Hueristic -9
17.kingcolex -8
18.Lambie Slayer -7
19.Negotiation -6
20.Toxic2040 -6
2.micgoossens -101
3.vapourminer -40.5
4.LFC_Bitcoin -34
5.Dabs -29.5
6.600watt -28.5
7.Globb0 -28.5
8.bones261 -23.5
9.BobLawblaw -21
10.mindrust -20.5
11.jbreher -19
12.infofront -18
13.ssmc2 -14
14.Wilhelm -13.5
15.fillippone -12
16.Hueristic -9
17.kingcolex -8
18.Lambie Slayer -7
19.Negotiation -6
20.Toxic2040 -6
Nice update, I think monthly cadence is more insightful, as less prone to weekly imbalances due to MS drought (mic, I do hear you).
Sadly, It a little bit delayed update, but I commit doing those as soon as sir LoyceV releases data dumps.
Still fixing glitches here and there, I am using this to getting better at data management (errors are mine).
September 07, 2019, 10:49:58 AM
Are you long or short? What % of capital? What are your take profit and stop loss levels?
I'm long.If you count the btc/fiat/stocks ratio I'm 99% btc, and have been so since 2016. If you take properties/land into the equation I'm still 80% btc.
I'm debt-free. I have my own house and my own land.
I sell a small portion every month to cover my bills and everyday expenses. The rest stays in btc -- always.
I quit my corporate job in 2016. Because fuck them.
For me there is no take profit level. When the time comes, I won't need fiat.
September 07, 2019, 10:39:31 AM
@APompliano
This week in crypto:
1. Apple says they’re watching crypto
2. Binance issue USD stablecoin
3. Caliber issues digital mortgages
4. VanEck offers limited Bitcoin ETF
5. Franklin Templeton tokenize fund
6. Bitcoin still not dead
Every corporation will eventually be in the game!
Twitter post: https://twitter.com/APompliano/status/1170321952604663808
This week in crypto:
1. Apple says they’re watching crypto
2. Binance issue USD stablecoin
3. Caliber issues digital mortgages
4. VanEck offers limited Bitcoin ETF
5. Franklin Templeton tokenize fund
6. Bitcoin still not dead
Every corporation will eventually be in the game!
Twitter post: https://twitter.com/APompliano/status/1170321952604663808
September 07, 2019, 10:31:01 AM
Are you long or short? What % of capital? What are your take profit and stop loss levels?
I'm long.If you count the btc/fiat/stocks ratio I'm 99% btc, and have been so since 2016. If you take properties/land into the equation I'm still 80% btc.
I'm debt-free. I have my own house and my own land.
I sell a small portion every month to cover my bills and everyday expenses. The rest stays in btc -- always.
I quit my corporate job in 2016. Because fuck them.
For me there is no take profit level. When the time comes, I won't need fiat.
September 07, 2019, 09:52:36 AM
Actually it's as Lauda says. The Segregated Witness thingy basically alters the transaction format so that certain (most) cryptographic proofs (the "witness") are not on the main blockchain (they're "segregated"). That's why space can be saved: segwit transactions can be stored more efficiently because some data can be discarded. This is why fees are significantly lower.
This is also incorrect. The signatures get stored in the chain as before, they just aren't counted towards the classic block size limit due to the segregation that you have mentioned.
September 07, 2019, 09:43:47 AM
Actually it's as Lauda says. The Segregated Witness thingy basically alters the transaction format so that certain (most) cryptographic proofs (the "witness") are not on the main blockchain (they're "segregated"). That's why space can be saved: segwit transactions can be stored more efficiently because some data can be discarded. This is why fees are significantly lower.
This is also incorrect. The signatures get stored in the chain as before, they just aren't counted towards the classic block size limit due to the segregation that you have mentioned. Space isn't saved, the chain size is growing much faster than ever. The ignorant/uneducated/bamboozled folk that said 'too little too late' were completely wrong; even this "little" increase is starting to become a mild issue.I'm not sure about this, maybe you are right.
In these matters, it's usually unwise to doubt my answer (if anything, it's usually just oddly written rather than incorrect). 
September 07, 2019, 09:41:45 AM
another bcash idiot for my ignore list
saying that segwit is not bitcoin is the same like saying TCP is not IP. it's the same, but it's another layer. TCP can't exist without IP and segwit can't exist without bitcoin.
Saying that is actually wrong. You are mixing up SegWit and LN. LN is another layer. SegWit is part of Bitcoin. saying that segwit is not bitcoin is the same like saying TCP is not IP. it's the same, but it's another layer. TCP can't exist without IP and segwit can't exist without bitcoin.
I'm not sure about this, maybe you are right. But LN is based on segwit and segwit has a second name, the consensus layer.
September 07, 2019, 09:36:03 AM
another bcash idiot for my ignore list
saying that segwit is not bitcoin is the same like saying TCP is not IP. it's the same, but it's another layer. TCP can't exist without IP and segwit can't exist without bitcoin.
Saying that is actually wrong. You are mixing up SegWit and LN. LN is another layer. SegWit is part of Bitcoin. saying that segwit is not bitcoin is the same like saying TCP is not IP. it's the same, but it's another layer. TCP can't exist without IP and segwit can't exist without bitcoin.
I'm not sure about this, maybe you are right. But LN is based on segwit and segwit has a second name, the consensus layer. LN is like one of many possible apps which can run on segwit. perhaps we can call LN a part of the third layer.
September 07, 2019, 09:12:10 AM
another bcash idiot for my ignore list
saying that segwit is not bitcoin is the same like saying TCP is not IP. it's the same, but it's another layer. TCP can't exist without IP and segwit can't exist without bitcoin.
Saying that is actually wrong. You are mixing up SegWit and LN. LN is another layer. SegWit is part of Bitcoin. saying that segwit is not bitcoin is the same like saying TCP is not IP. it's the same, but it's another layer. TCP can't exist without IP and segwit can't exist without bitcoin.
September 07, 2019, 09:06:57 AM
There's a lot of evidence that Segwit is the alteration. Read the docs, the white paper
The same evidence that CSW is satoshi? I'm not sure if you're trolling or trying to be serious. The shitcoin section is that way --->
September 07, 2019, 09:03:34 AM
Good morning Bitcoinland.
Leveled out and going sideways after yesterday's little correction... currently $10420USD/$13725CAD (Bitcoinaverage).
Still well up on the week though. It's starting to feel like we're almost done with 4 digits.
A couple more months and we should be on our way.
Go Bitcoin go.
Long.
Almost all of capital (excluding personal items like art, real estate, antiques, musical instruments etc.)
No stops.
Take profits only when absolutely necessary.
Acquire more whenever possible, especially when the price dips.
Live happily ever after.
Leveled out and going sideways after yesterday's little correction... currently $10420USD/$13725CAD (Bitcoinaverage).
Still well up on the week though. It's starting to feel like we're almost done with 4 digits.
A couple more months and we should be on our way.
Go Bitcoin go.
Are you long or short? What % of capital? What are your take profit and stop loss levels?
Long.
Almost all of capital (excluding personal items like art, real estate, antiques, musical instruments etc.)
No stops.
Take profits only when absolutely necessary.
Acquire more whenever possible, especially when the price dips.
Live happily ever after.
Jump to: