Topic: Wall Observer new ownership - page 3. (Read 6929 times)
That signature campaign pay by the word? Or what?
Why is this turning into a discussion about my sex/gender and whatnot again? 
Because you started it when you insisted that all gender specific pronouns attributed to you were sexist, presumably because you enjoy the attention?
hahahaha Lauda.. .If you are potentially going to resume to power, you have to take these nutjobs in stride and humor, no?
Any potential personal detail can be a cause for attack - these are the interwebs...
surely sometimes posters go a bit too far, but frequently, a bit of outrageousness is within the realm of expectations - and sure we can choose to skim, ignore or engage - or some variation that includes finding some humor in the childish and provocation attempts from posters who might even be adults who are not living in their mom's basement..
Why is this turning into a discussion about my sex/gender and whatnot again?
Because you started it when you insisted that all gender specific pronouns attributed to you were sexist, presumably because you enjoy the attention?
Personally, I find Lauda's insistence on gender neutrality refreshing. Sexual ambiguity is very today.
... but is it really ambiguous when she insists on being on top?
Do you stay on top or under the cockroach??
Just curiosity, none of my business...
I want to know who supports Trump before I cast my vote!
Although I'm not running for WO presidency (POTWOT) I support Trump.
Problem?
Why is this turning into a discussion about my sex/gender and whatnot again?
Personally, I find Lauda's insistence on gender neutrality refreshing. Sexual ambiguity is very today.
... but is it really ambiguous when she insists on being on top?
I like having the woman on top sometimes.
Personally, I find Lauda's insistence on gender neutrality refreshing. Sexual ambiguity is very today.
... but is it really ambiguous when she insists on being on top?
I like Trump, but I'm not American.
edit: Thanks for the info about why Lauda should not be in a position of power Vod, you are so helpful
All I did was point something out - what you scammers do with the info is your business.
Vod. How's boat ownership treating you?
edit: Thanks for the info about why Lauda should not be in a position of power Vod, you are so helpful
All I did was point something out - what you scammers do with the info is your business.
I want to know who supports Trump before I cast my vote!
Moderation in moderation ?
This is tense
Ha ha - careful what y'all wish for
The next day is CRITICAL for the good of BTC.
... this thread does have a culture ..be a pity to lose that culture!
This is tense
Ha ha - careful what y'all wish for
The next day is CRITICAL for the good of BTC.
... this thread does have a culture ..be a pity to lose that culture!
Both roach's opinions and Lauda's extortion history are a matter of opinion.
She can no more accuse roach of posting nonsense than she can cast away the judgment of her past actions.
BOTH are a matter of opinion.
Of course a women would be offended by his sexuality commentary..
But it is in fact believable or more importantly it is to HIM.
HE HIMSELF BELIEVES WHAT HE POSTED.
So who is Lauda to declare roach's opinions nonsense?
Myself and others agree with him by the way.. At least in a way.
She doesn't want to be viewed as an extortionist but it is believable enough to some people who heard about the drama.
And I do tend to side with her on that too.
I am guessing she (or should I say it?) believed what she or it was doing was well intended regardless of the technical way she went about it.
Point being is I don't believe in calling a person a troll because you do not agree with their views.
She didn't use that word but others have and she implied it heavily.
Is freedom from negative judgment for you and when you need / want it?
..or for all?
Also the discussion taking place here should help show who is a more appropriate moderator of sorts.
A mod needs a balanced and unbiased fair view.
Is that what we see here with specific people?
She can no more accuse roach of posting nonsense than she can cast away the judgment of her past actions.
BOTH are a matter of opinion.
Of course a women would be offended by his sexuality commentary..
But it is in fact believable or more importantly it is to HIM.
HE HIMSELF BELIEVES WHAT HE POSTED.
So who is Lauda to declare roach's opinions nonsense?
Myself and others agree with him by the way.. At least in a way.
She doesn't want to be viewed as an extortionist but it is believable enough to some people who heard about the drama.
And I do tend to side with her on that too.
I am guessing she (or should I say it?) believed what she or it was doing was well intended regardless of the technical way she went about it.
Point being is I don't believe in calling a person a troll because you do not agree with their views.
She didn't use that word but others have and she implied it heavily.
Is freedom from negative judgment for you and when you need / want it?
..or for all?
Also the discussion taking place here should help show who is a more appropriate moderator of sorts.
A mod needs a balanced and unbiased fair view.
Is that what we see here with specific people?
We ought to have Bruce "Bruce Fenton" Fenton in the running. That is a natural leader.
Every time she quotes me I feel a little bit dirty.
If you are believed to have significant amounts of money then you may get extorted by Lauda.
I'm surprised a modern scammer like yourself doesn't keep abreast of recent default trust changes.
I think the above is another piece of evidence that Lauda should not be in any kind of position of power as multiple long standing extremely reputable and trustworthy members of the community have decided to exclude the opinions (via trust ratings) of Lauda.
edit: Thanks for the info about why Lauda should not be in a position of power Vod, you are so helpful
How can you tell that OGnasty as excluded Lauda?
Personally, I find Lauda's insistence on gender neutrality refreshing. Sexual ambiguity is very today.
Thanks for your excellent addition to the discussion - it makes soo much sense.
And great, you earned a bob or two from your sig!
Which is exactly the type of posts that should be deleted. There is a lot of garbage in the whole section, let alone WO.And great, you earned a bob or two from your sig!
Most sensible people have r0ach on ignore. Casual anti-semitism isn't edgy, it's disturbed.
Relevance? Most newbies and non-members who read that thread do not, thus his negative impact is persistent.Mrs. Lauda, are you prepared to elaborate on your involvement in extorting a user of the forum?
"Mrs.", sexist again? There was no extortion. Chill out. What is this turning into, "scammers rejoice"? Meanwhile r0ach is still spamming nonsense, in this very thread.
Meanwhile r0ach is still spamming nonsense, in this very thread...as multiple long standing extremely reputable and trustworthy members of the community..
Trustworthy, HostFat and OgNasty? I think you didn't take your pills today. Looks like his escrow business is losing ground. Oh and don't vote Lauda.. She's is illuminati lizard people and worse... a chick.
Watch out. Occasionally, I do bite and when I do, I bite hard. Most sensible people have r0ach on ignore. Casual anti-semitism isn't edgy, it's disturbed.
Mrs. Lauda, are you prepared to elaborate on your involvement in extorting a user of the forum?
Jump to: