Topic: Wall Observer new ownership - page 9. (Read 6933 times)
I haven't seen a statement from you, Lauda, on how you'd moderate the thread. Do you plan to impose on-topic?
Will you publish who voted for who again?
Yes.
How would you handle a situation with a large number of new accounts voting? The decision to consider 'who' voted is a step in the right direction, but I'm wondering how you would execute it if someone were to be leading by a large margin with e.g. such votes.
I'll ignore apparent vote-stuffing completely.
Probably I'll be able to tell the proper ordering by just skimming the color-coded voter list. In edge cases, I might devise some sort of point system.
I vote for Lauda.
Unlock my favorite thread already and free Adam! #freeadam
Unlock my favorite thread already and free Adam! #freeadam
Will you publish who voted for who again? I am not really familiar with some of these names to vote for them. I had hoped Jimbo would be a part of it.
I will declare a poll winner by considering who voted what, not just by counting votes.
How would you handle a situation with a large number of new accounts voting? The decision to consider 'who' voted is a step in the right direction, but I'm wondering how you would execute it if someone were to be leading by a large margin with e.g. such votes.
See: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/what-to-do-with-the-wall-observer-thread-1993570
I will declare a poll winner by considering who voted what, not just by counting votes.
Polls on forum administration are always advisory, but in this case I don't care very much who owns the thread, so I don't see any reason why I wouldn't put the winner of this poll in charge of the thread. Though if the thread becomes problematic again, the thread owner will have to be replaced.
I will declare a poll winner by considering who voted what, not just by counting votes.
Polls on forum administration are always advisory, but in this case I don't care very much who owns the thread, so I don't see any reason why I wouldn't put the winner of this poll in charge of the thread. Though if the thread becomes problematic again, the thread owner will have to be replaced.
lightfoot - "I would go with a largely hands-off option, no directly blasting other people, no posting marketing crap, simple stuff"
arklan - "if mods are needed, i have the time to do it"
Erkallys- "I candidate if this is needed. At least I have no hatred toward me as well as any fanboy." - "I would not be too strict on moderation, and I am available all day long."
infofront- "I'm not a prolific poster, or well known personality, but I'd volunteer to help moderate. I started the "unmoderated" wall observer thread because I believe in the laissez-faire nature of Adam's thread."
Lauda - "I could create one, and would if someone were to get something like ChartBuddy running again." <-- from another thread but related to this one.
empowering - "I probably have the necessary erratic mental health condition..." "...So I guess I will throw my hat in - happy to do it, not fussed either though."
arklan - "if mods are needed, i have the time to do it"
Erkallys- "I candidate if this is needed. At least I have no hatred toward me as well as any fanboy." - "I would not be too strict on moderation, and I am available all day long."
infofront- "I'm not a prolific poster, or well known personality, but I'd volunteer to help moderate. I started the "unmoderated" wall observer thread because I believe in the laissez-faire nature of Adam's thread."
Lauda - "I could create one, and would if someone were to get something like ChartBuddy running again." <-- from another thread but related to this one.
empowering - "I probably have the necessary erratic mental health condition..." "...So I guess I will throw my hat in - happy to do it, not fussed either though."
Jump to: