Pages:
Author

Topic: Warren Buffet: "Stay away from Bitcoin" - page 3. (Read 10099 times)

hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 521
March 14, 2014, 10:46:25 PM
#95
Apologies but I've got a music itch today. I think Buffet lives a sheltered life. Doesn't he realize the world is a changin'.

I can't wait to finish programming so I can have some fun, haha!
legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1040
A Great Time to Start Something!
March 14, 2014, 10:19:25 PM
#94
Does the Warren Buffet have Prime Rib on Friday night?  Roll Eyes
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 521
March 14, 2014, 10:08:44 PM
#93
he loves the current government system of economic fascism (which he can easily lobby and control).!

+1

Bitcoin community warns "Stay away from Warren Buffet!" 

Hahaha. Right on bro!

I rather hope we feel like this about the beauty of humanity.

Miguel - Adorn.
legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1040
A Great Time to Start Something!
March 14, 2014, 10:02:27 PM
#92
Bitcoin community warns "Stay away from Warren Buffet!" 
member
Activity: 101
Merit: 11
March 14, 2014, 09:59:50 PM
#91
he loves the current government system of economic fascism (which he can easily lobby and control).!
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 521
March 14, 2014, 09:42:45 PM
#90

It is a derivative of Marvin Gaye's Got To Give It Up.

Cheers  Smiley

(I was born in New Orleans, the birthplace of Jazz)
hero member
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
www.DonateMedia.org
March 14, 2014, 09:22:09 PM
#89
To me he is saying that until the bitcoin "industry" or any other system proves there is a "saving" to the user and/or receiver of funds ie transactions costs are less than other remittance forms it is not worth investing in.
One could argue that you could transfer millions in fiat almost instantly and pay a couple cents in fees, whereas PayPal charges a percentage or a bank wire would take more time and cost more. But you are right about the confidence in exchanges, and PayPal collects more in fees so it would be a better investment. Unless you are in Bitcoin for speculation rather than collecting fees (by mining).
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1199
March 14, 2014, 08:58:29 PM
#88

That sounds good Smiley Like a music for this thread readers Tongue

regards!
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 521
March 14, 2014, 08:43:02 PM
#87
Bolded emphasis is mine:

I think he's being sincere about it. He knows that governments don't like the idea of people being free to trade goods and services with an unregulated, decentralized currency. Tax evasion, piracy, and black markets are the main reasons governments are likely planning to impose serious regulations on the internet. They want precise control over the flow of information. Whatever happens it's going to suck because most of us are powerless to stop it.

Agreed except the bolded part. We are more powerful now, we just need the right technology. Stay tuned...

I am a fan of crypto but Buffet has a valid point of view and has been a proven winner in the past. To me he is saying that until the bitcoin "industry" or any other system proves there is a "saving" to the user and/or receiver of funds ie transactions costs are less than other remittance forms it is not worth investing in.

Correct. But as I pointed out in my first post upthread (which apparently flew over the head of most readers), rather than lowering costs to use it as a fiat money transfer tool, we will simply create new features (e.g. anonymity) which fiat no longer has (fiat cash is going away). And our new currency will support the virtual commerce knowledge age, which fiat won't.

Buffet is in the dinosaur old world economy. We are preparing to do euthanasia on that dying piece of shit industrial+retail+tangible economy.

And I feel like dancing to that!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yyDUC1LUXSU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TH8m6J3gPH0
member
Activity: 82
Merit: 27
March 14, 2014, 08:17:59 PM
#86
I am a fan of crypto but Buffet has a valid point of view and has been a proven winner in the past. To me he is saying that until the bitcoin "industry" or any other system proves there is a "saving" to the user and/or receiver of funds ie transactions costs are less than other remittance forms it is not worth investing in.  Part of that saving (or benefit) has to be in confidence that front and back end parts (exchanges) are working well. To him  -  is bitcoin a better investment than say buying into paypal?. At present the answer is not at all clear so the answer is no.

Note he is also not going to be a buyer of bitcoin itself as it is far too volatile.

I agree with this assessment. But I will still use bitcoin or its variants for some things/uses but expect to still use a credit, debit and cheque book for some matters.  
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1199
March 14, 2014, 07:56:36 PM
#85
Got to agree with the old man, this is not for a regular average Joe. These kinds of things are only for the enthusiasts, hobbyists, and risk-takers!

It depends - because in few years average Joe will be more "skilled" in new technologies than it is now. So Perhaps - Bitcoin is not for people who do not know how to use a smartphone and computer.
If you know how to "use" it. You can manage to buy and storage your Bitcoins.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 521
March 14, 2014, 07:43:57 PM
#84
Riots? Martial Law?  You have got to be kidding.  This reeks of statist fear-mongering.

Not even the great depression brought on Martial Law.

Unfortunately the situation is very different now in some critical ways which could indeed lead to riots and martial law.

...

The only thing the socialism knows how to do at this point is tax and spend.

There is no place for capital to run to. The economy is shifting to the Knowledge Age where capital is less important than specific knowledge and small world-changing focused opportunities.

So you are going to have a very confused and pissed off society as this accelerates 2016ish.

It is happening:

http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/03/14/russian-capital-flows/
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/03/14/germany-to-throw-in-prison-people-with-swiss-accounts/
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/03/14/is-there-a-global-bank-run/
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/03/13/preliminary-capital-flows-fleeing-russia-exceed-50-billion/
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/03/13/bank-runs-starting-in-ukraine/
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
March 14, 2014, 06:57:26 PM
#83
Got to agree with the old man, this is not for a regular average Joe. These kinds of things are only for the enthusiasts, hobbyists, and risk-takers!
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 521
March 14, 2014, 06:53:40 PM
#82

1. Picture a complete freeze in lending, and a lack of access to cash.  No one can buy cars or houses.  People with no cash on hand couldn't buy anything.  Stores can't stock shelves or pay employees.  Forget just the banks, every company from GE to local mom and pop shops would be under within a month.  Tens of millions would suddenly find themselves out of work.  You'd have mass riots in every major city in the nation.  If we were lucky, we would be living in a state of martial law.

This entire premise is based on the fact that new players will not enter the space that just appeared.

Riots? Martial Law?  You have got to be kidding.  This reeks of statist fear-mongering.

Not even the great depression brought on Martial Law.

Unfortunately the situation is very different now in some critical ways which could indeed lead to riots and martial law.

At that time the USA was still predominantly a rural and more self-sufficient society. My grandfather was walking around selling potatos during the Great Depression.

The Great Depression was caused by the network effects from the First Industrial Revolution which created mass production factories in the Second Industrial Revolution. This bankrupted the cottage industry and socialism in Europe. Which caused 76% of the world's gold to flee to the USA.

World War 1, FDR's New Deal, and WW2 were able to keep the people busy and people could survive in the semi-rural ways too. The USA was a net creditor and had much strength in industrial undercapacity and huge resources to apply to the Second Industrial Age.

Whereas, the situation we have now is that all nations are bankrupt and have irrelevance to the Knowledge Age. Thus government has no clue how to solve this debt bomb.

The only thing the socialism knows how to do at this point is tax and spend.

There is no place for capital to run to. The economy is shifting to the Knowledge Age where capital is less important than specific knowledge and small world-changing focused opportunities.

So you are going to have a very confused and pissed off society as this accelerates 2016ish.

2. And as for your ridiculous solution, is this something you actually spent more than 2 seconds to think up?  Honestly, how long do you think it would take for the government create this plan, to identify these people, and to mail them checks.  A few months?  A year?
As opposed to giving reward to the stupid and losers?  Now that was ridiculous and down right evil.

And as for your time frame, there is this tech called a database that  Dr Codd nailed for us in 1969.

As a real world example, the Australian government gave out $800 dollars to every tax payer directly into their bank account within 3 weeks.  It's not hard.
It was a perfect Friedman helicopter drop.  Minimal implementation cost and only a few dead people wasted it.

3. What money was spent?  In the end, the banks paid the money back, so what money could have been "saved" for a better use?

The opportunity costs that the US lost by keeping the dead wood alive is immeasurable.  You are currently experiencing a "long slow painful recovery" due to propping up zombie businesses.

Worse than that. Central banks have delayed for decades the correction that should have come in the 1970s so that the boomers would have learned to be programmers as the personal computer was born. Instead the debt propped up all sorts of old world economy business that is no longer relevant. So now we will have an abrupt and very painful global adjustment that may even take us into a Dark Age.

I detailed this at the following post and downwards in the thread:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5637503
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 521
March 14, 2014, 06:29:47 PM
#81
Which programming languages do you consider future proof, Anonymint? Obviously people will have their favourites and it depends on the job, I understand that. But I'd like to know your views.

I also listened to your recordings earlier on. Were you cut off at the end? It seemed like there was more to come. But the recording ended abruptly.

Apologies I deleted those recordings from my thread because I was so mentally and physically exhausted yesterday and somewhat incoherent. Also I gave away too many details on my plans. There were two recordings and the second one continued where the first one got chopped off. There was a lot more to explain but I think it is not yet the right timing for me. I am also suffering from exhaustion and need to focus my efforts more.

I can't predict which computer language will be most important, but I am nearly certain it won't be C, C++, C#, nor Go. Because their typing systems are inadequate for the level of expression we need to do, and if you don't need strong typing then use Python instead.

It will either be (or probably both) a dynamically typed language (i.e. actually statically uni-typed) such as Python or a statically typed language that is not verbose due to its very powerful Higher Kinded typing system such as Scala (hopefully a version 3 that has a first-class union type, which is the main lacking feature of Scala which Ceylon has!) something Ceylon doesn't have. I was working on the latter for my Copute which is intended to be a better Scala and I will come back to that if I can finish my work in the Bitcoin space.

Are you a talented programmer? You can PM me.

I got into a discussion about languages at the following thread:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3003835

Some where in that thread, I explained why I think Go sucks.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 257
March 14, 2014, 06:27:18 PM
#80
it is funny how people here think they have more background than warren buffet
newbie
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
March 14, 2014, 06:20:29 PM
#79
Which programming languages do you consider future proof, Anonymint? Obviously people will have their favourites and it depends on the job, I understand that. But I'd like to know your views.

I also listened to your recordings earlier on. Were you cut off at the end? It seemed like there was more to come. But the recording ended abruptly.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 521
March 14, 2014, 06:14:42 PM
#78
"Buffett also said he would steer clear of bitcoin. Buffett said the cryptocurrency is an effective payment system, but “so is a check.” The idea that bitcoin has some “intrinsic value is just a joke.”

http://blogs.marketwatch.com/thetell/2014/03/14/warren-buffett-dont-dump-stocks-on-china-or-ukraine-and-stay-away-from-bitcoin/?mod=sfmw

Well... It's too late for some of us to stay away now.

Remember, this is the same guy that said to avoid investing in internet companies.

I respect Warrens opinion he doesn't invest in the tech sphere because he doesn't put money in things he does not understand
Since he doesn't understand bitcoin he will miss it like the rise of the internet age
But for him it does not matter his fortune is from doing what he knows best so I would say to let him be

Normally I'd agree with him because he's one of the best investors/economists on the planet but...in this case he just sounds like a rambling senior citizen that doesn't understand the internet and its related technologies.

Indeed the old tangible capital world is going away folks... and Buffet will die just-in-time to fade away with it...

I also knew in 1999 that the dot.com crash was coming because I was trying to buy PPC advertising for my CoolPage.com (had million users at that time, roughly 1% of the internet) and what I saw was the ROI on advertising was negative for any profitable business, thus there was massive overinvestment driving the ad prices too high.

So when Homepage.com offered me $1 million in stock options to take over CoolPage.com, I declined. I took a couple hundred thousand instead in a non-exclusive license, and reaped another 7 years of sales ongoing.

But Buffet missed investing in numerous internet companies that have made others into $billionaires.

The model of business he invests in is dying. We are leaving the tangible capital age and entering the knowledge age, wherein you don't need large stored capital to launch a business. For example the 3D printer (which can print itself) will eventually obliterate factories, retail stores, and shipped goods. There are already 3D printers which can print multiple materials on the same object.

Also in the past knowledge was captured by industrial stored capital, because one needed physical production and distribution. Stored capital is a claim of future human labor or production. But now for example factories will be automated with robots, so the industrialists will depend on the knowledge workers.

The knowledge workers can say "fuck you" to $billions, we don't need it. All that stored capital is becoming useless and won't be able to find a home. It is what you know in your brain that becomes capital.

When the $223 trillion global debt bomb (with $1000 trillion in derivatives to hold it up, and another $1000 trillion in unfunded social liabilities promised to the boomers) implodes circa 2016ish as the marginal-utility-of-debt has become negative right about now and the BRICs are starting to collapse (with Europe and Japan to follow by next year and USA in 2016), the all those people who are useless in the Knowledge Age will be unemployable. And those $billionaires will lose their net worth relative to the capital in our brains which will grow orders-of-magnitude in value (what we can produce and buy with our efforts).

Oxford U predicts 47% of all existing jobs will be erased by automation within 19 years (20 years from last year when the research was published).
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Knowledge is Power
March 14, 2014, 05:43:13 PM
#77
Normally I'd agree with him because he's one of the best investors/economists on the planet but...in this case he just sounds like a rambling senior citizen that doesn't understand the internet and its related technologies.
hero member
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
www.DonateMedia.org
March 14, 2014, 05:10:40 PM
#76
Warren Buffett is being generious with his praise of Bitcoin.  Bitcoin is the tulip of the 21st century, destined to be obliterated by a better-implemented altcoin.

Oh my god, another florist. Please explain to me what has a flower to do with Bitcoin protocol? Can you send with your tulip on sunday at 1pm money from China to USA without middle-man within 1 hour almost for free? No? So stop comparing it...you guys with your tulips. If you really believe it is the same, why are you even here man/woman? Your comparison is just stupid, i am sorry to being rude.
The 'tulip' that most people refer to is the tulip bulb bubble, or tulip mania, that occurred in Europe. The peak of the bubble was in March 1637, with "some single tulip bulbs sold for more than 10 times the annual income of a skilled craftsman." The tulip bulb bubble and the potential Bitcoin bubble. Wink

More info can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulip_mania or http://www.investopedia.com/features/crashes/crashes2.asp
Pages:
Jump to: