and so? this isn't the point, it doesn't change that the bitcoin tech can be used for something else other than money, it doesn't matter how gold can have more differents use(or its uses are vastly different from trading to something else), compared to bitcoin tech, if the latter can still have more than one use
Firstly, if someone develops something on top of the Bitcoin blockchain, using the existing infrastructure for his purposes (whatever they might be), the miners may not be quite happy with that (with all ensuing consequences thereby). Secondly, if this new development has nothing to do with the Bitcoin main functionality (that of a payment system), which is what your point is about (since you are "not talking about a decentralized payment"), then the success of it will, nevertheless, ultimately depend on the Bitcoin success as the payment system (miners opinion ignored here). So the question is, why would anyone want to risk into this?
again you are diverting your speech, the fact that miners are not happy, does not mean nothing, my whole point is that it can be used for something different than trading, is this so hard to understand
i think yes, in your case, because, the one that not understands is you and not i
and again has nothing to do with the risk or anything involved, it is simply possible to build it, you are just raising other random concerns that has nothing to do with what we were talking about at the beginning
but i can simply respond to your question with, why not? every company is taking big risks nowadays this isn't any different...
Besides that, the first link that you provided as a proof of your point (and thought so cool about) actually talks about using the Bitcoin protocol (and implementing an independent blockchain), not existing Bitcoin blockchain (which serves only as an example). So who is actually turning the conversation in whose favor?
well that was just an example of another possible use, my main point was toward the blockchain
and see above, you are still the one that are turning the conversation around, with something that again has nothing to do with our first quote
if you are deliberately diverting the conversation , only to stretch it more, and claim to be right , then we can close this now