I say it sincerely that that's the list that everyone needed to have, especially during the criticism in the topic about zkSNACKS' decision to filter inputs. Haha.
On the ridiculous
petition topic, I repeated over and over that Nostr is the decentralized discovery layer for coordinators. It's been this way the whole time.
Hahaha, I remember that. But we already know that Cobra would do no such thing unless the app/wallet is truly damaging on what Bitcoin stands for. Accepting the trade-offs and different models should be OK.
I believe any of those coordinators are not "working with" on-chain analysts, no?
Ginger Wallet is marketing themselves as actively blocking criminal activity:
Plus were those coordinators already online before zkSNACKS' decision to stop their own coordinator?
Yes, there were several people who had coordinators running prior to this.
Personally, I don't have a problem with coordinators that decide to filter what goes through them. But - I have posted about it before - the problem is how accurate are those filters, and how do we dispute their findings if they got it wrong?
