Topic: WAVES - Complete Blockchain ecosystem for a token economy - page 24. (Read 131026 times)

One single large owner, waves team or their helper voted away my token after 5 years activity on the platform from the verified listing.

This token already obtaining top voting two years ago:

https://tokenrating.wavesexplorer.com/?filter=top&page=1


Waves team did not approve so they changed the entire voting mechanism and issued a new centrally issued wx token to recreate a fake voting which is rigged by a single whale.


All support from waves will be stopped and focusing on eth only.

They think this waves token is the most important for this project and want to sabotage it but it is not the original:

https://etherscan.io/token/0xa4daae9552cd2390ee1dcdd1a76bc8d0eea22609


I am selling these NFTs with Christies on behalf of client and will partner with top 20 Exchange IEO after funding the listing fee with OTC NEXO NFT loan.

After there is money in this project, 3 million, 300 million. Nothing will go back into waves except pocket money because this is clown circus and also FSB communist party controlled.

To support existing investors there will remain market making activity in this waves token because it is still listed on aggregators since 2018:

https://coincodex.com/crypto/marquise-museum/
https://www.coinlore.com/coin/marquise-museum/historical-data
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/marquise-museum/
https://coinranking.com/coin/PvSxRee_lzFu+marquisemuseum-museum
https://coinpaprika.com/coin/abtx-m2-marquise-museum/

My advice is to redeem these tokens for NFTs and we forget about waves and move to XCP or ETH.

I have sent OTC offers to top 10 rich list a few days ago so if you have a few million M2 you can still get the NFT worth 30k but this offer is only for long term holders:

https://opensea.io/collection/pimpfashion2
http://dev.pywaves.org/assets/BS1KFNR8zrXKBEWdUUvpaP6G57Hic3aESkwK7qQKdLpB

Waves team think they sabotaged successfully a valuable token for the Museum but this is like attacking a testnet token. It is very pathetic to attack this project but I see that they did the same to many other cool tokens on waves.

So my question is why did they even have the token creation function only to attack project developers?

I have spent alot of time and money into waves only for this counter attack. Because there is not primary market on waves it is Uniswap ERC-20, I will not try and attack them in return, but what they tried to do is economic warfare, nothing less.

Crypto is not decentralized amphictyonic economy, it is illegitimate Neofeudalist usurpation slave economy. It is controlled by third world military dictatorships and the five eyes intelligence community.

Independent token creators like myself who are not part of illuminati will never be promoted or gain visibility in the wider market. In fact if it somehow did happen they will send assassination or money laundering charges. But the easiest method is simply suppressing it from public participation with soft power methods.

If I knew this 5 years ago of course I would not even try to work in this industry.

Waves team is not the only aggressor against this project, yahoo, twitter, facebook, google ads and a few others also attacked it.

There were others who tried to help and for them I send thanks and they are also on website partner section. But this is small guys, the big players are all subverted.

You hate Waves but you can't stop coming here. A kind a perversion ? Some kind of pathology ? I worry about you.
Are you feeling alone on the ADK thread ? Do you want i come with you ? I would be happy to say some shit there.

Its overly speculated because the market is also reacting very sharply in every direction. Probably just $100 but less $150 somewhere in the middle just measuring it conservatively.

The entire crypto market is becoming very strange since the war. The entire crypto marketcap drops up to more than 100B in a day and back the next day or two. Trying the shake down the small holders I guess.

fuck waves

400 USD.

I am sure you can provide feedback either here or in the telegram channel. To me your complaint sounds more like "something has changed and I don't like it". Of course it would be nice to get a product that is completely finished at release, but for new software this is rarely the case.

The Vires problem is concerning indeed. If Vires/Waves/Neutrino is able to survive the current crisis it will emerge as an improved ecosystem. The first good steps have been done with some of the Vires proposals. Let's see where we are headed...

they keep doing devolutionary "upgrades" the dex also stopped reporting nonkike tokens value, making it near impossible to sift through coins with real value.

The vires collapse may be the death blow for waves in total or for some time until waves team can cover 500$ million loss( actually theft? why would they recover 500 million$ in usdt and usdc that they stole?)

For me, the old explorer is still working.

I guess intercom is that chat that you can see when opening the new explorer.

I also agree it is looking nicer, but some good features are lost. However, I still prefer wscan.io.

You can still use the old Explorer: https://wavesexplorer.com
But you are right that the implementation is not good. Unfortunately, the support here does not have a discussion with us (with a few exceptions) and therefore I think that your wishes for improvement will not be implemented. Another possibility would be to discuss this on their other channels like Twitter and Telegram. Maybe they will listen there to that more?

Edit: That is strange. Shortly after posting, I was still able to open the old explorer. But two minutes later not any more. It redirect me to the new one.
On the old page I could still read that feedback via intercom (whatever that is) is possible. So give it a try.

Not good! -> while at the old Explorer I could directly see how much Waves a pool transfered to me for lending, I must now open the "Mass Transfer" and search there for my address, perfectly concealed between 3987 other addresses/amounts! How confusing and intricately is this? Clearly a disimprovement! Reverse this to the old Explorer´s schematic again!

Bottom is in at 19 for 2 reasons:

1. Node operators except neutrino will be unprofitable below this price
2. march sellers want in at 16 range so they will be fronted

Could wick to 14 usd before reversal into triple digits, target 400 usd.

I think 39-57 b wave first before 14 c, then 400+.

lots of retail shorts to nuke, some whale will eat them.

High risk investment none the less.

Although the current price of Waves is not up to expectation, Lisk is a lot worse, it didn't break ATH from 2017, no longer in top 100, I can say I made some good profit selling at 40-60 range, Lisk not so much.

I remember 2018-2019 good old times. Used to be a Lisk vs Waves war. Both kinda shit the bed.

When I tried to withdraw my ethereum and it asked for 0.01 ETH fee, I just sold it for waves, sent the waves to exchange with small fee and sold it, since I was just needed to get USDT.

So after waves have dropped a lot in price, is there a lot of concern in this or not?  Now i dd notice usdn is getting back very close to a dollar so that is good right?  i recall someone mentioned you need usdn to get back to stable dollar price first?  They also said in order to do that, waves price need to drop for this to happen?  Can someone explain this?



Also do people here store their other coins in their waves exchange account?  You could store other coins like btc, bch, usdt, usdc, litecoin and many other coins in it.  Are there any cons to do this?  i do notice like the withdraw fees seem to be higher if you want to withdraw coins?  Example you could store ltc in waves exchange but withdraw fee is 0.01 ltc which is a lot more than few cents it would cost if you store ltc n hardware wallet like ledger?  i never installed litecoin in ledger but i heard sending ltc is only few cents?  BCH, the fee is 0.3 BCH for withdraw  seem ridiculous or is there something i'm missing here?



Now if you use the waves exchange and use it with your nano ledger, wouldn't that mean all your coins are safe though as long as your nano ledger seed is safe?  Because the cons of using an exchange is your account could be hacked.  So doesn't that mean you could store any coin there or stake coins like btc and earn some interest in it with lesser concern than if you were to stake them in waves exchange compared to nexo, celsius, gemini etc?

waves fronted eth btc blow off with +800% march vertical from usd 8 to 64. it is presently in an abc correction of which the a structure is almost complete perhaps 20 level before b move to 39.

after 39 and below 8 usd in final c wave there will be 3 year depression bear market because of stable coin regulation.

btc and eth is still waiting for multi decade blow off this was anticipated since 2019 300 000 btc then thats the end for it, netscape.

neither eth or waves or any other present day crypto is the real disruptor. it will be something deeper agi integrated it will not come from private sector too advanced.

this is only the play ground before the real thing so dont expect any lasting value in any of the present day cryptos 5 years out except for some early nfts.

In our recent AMA, we introduced our new Head of Ecosystem — Coleman Maher. The community came together to ask him about the 2022 Growth plan for the Waves Ecosystem.

+ we had some guest appearances 🤯

Catch the recap here!