Author

Topic: WAVES - Complete Blockchain ecosystem for a token economy - page 276. (Read 131367 times)

jr. member
Activity: 126
Merit: 1
I think that the waves do not greatly underestimate in the near future they will be on the same level with the air, this compand does everything possible for the development of waves and accessibility for each user
full member
Activity: 460
Merit: 100
Your professional profile on the blockchain
Now the price of the token has come close to the ICO price mark if you do not take into account bonuses, of course after the pump the price has fallen very much, probably the next phase of growth
full member
Activity: 322
Merit: 101
all they understand from marketing is sasha's uummms uuuhhhs in the presentations.
full member
Activity: 186
Merit: 100
Waves Decentralized Exchange - 69
Ethfinex - 79
IDEX - 92
CryptoBridge - 116
Stellar Decentralized Exchange - 142

https://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/volume/24-hour/

When you search "waves" in the related page first exchange to trade wave token is ranked 41.
So maybe a hudge work to list wave in big exchange.

remember that waves went frm 15 to 49 in 1 year.
Your stance 'Wave is the future just be patient' is a piece of s....t, just a catch sentence for dumbs.

Ivanov is killing slowly it's project.
Guess what : event SC launch on mainnet will have NO impact on the token price. As all previous upgrade unfortunately




I must reluctantly agree. Each major upgrade to Waves project has had little effect on price.

Though I don't think it is fair to criticize on the basis of price alone during a bear market, watching Waves forfeit its market share into utter obscurity (#49 CMC) has been very discouraging.

90% of Ivanov's efforts and budget should be toward marketing at this point, in my opinion...

...and going to New York or Berlin to give a sighing, stammering, autistic presentation to a bored audience does not count as marketing.
jr. member
Activity: 99
Merit: 1
Waves Decentralized Exchange - 69
Ethfinex - 79
IDEX - 92
CryptoBridge - 116
Stellar Decentralized Exchange - 142

https://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/volume/24-hour/

When you search "waves" in the related page first exchange to trade wave token is ranked 41.
So maybe a hudge work to list wave in big exchange.

remember that waves went frm 15 to 49 in 1 year.
Your stance 'Wave is the future just be patient' is a piece of s....t, just a catch sentence for dumbs.

Ivanov is killing slowly it's project.
Guess what : event SC launch on mainnet will have NO impact on the token price. As all previous upgrade unfortunately


hero member
Activity: 1064
Merit: 500
As soon as I am holding several Waves coins (I'd better say, MANY of them), I have a great hope that this alt will start gaining very soon. The market of the cryptocurrency is ready for the great changes.
full member
Activity: 322
Merit: 101
Waves Decentralized Exchange - 69
Ethfinex - 79
IDEX - 92
CryptoBridge - 116
Stellar Decentralized Exchange - 142

https://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/volume/24-hour/
almost all trading in waves dex are wash trading.

I kind of suspect this is true as well! (Wash trading meaning you buy/sell to yourself to create fake volume)
Unlike other exchanges though, all trades on the DEX are on the blockchain, so it's possible to decode the to/from addresses from the transaction data. In other words, this theory could be proven easily. Who wants to know what % of trades on the DEX are wash trading? Cheesy


3PCimbveKEQACLMMxtzKeW4T48V3diUpghG
3PGaVDYAZ4FvDxTQuCi26BHam8dZJPQS9he
3PPT7zKXghtQzm5SzuhNvdxKX87aPmHQV15

these addresses are some examples for wash trading. they buy from each other and then sell immediately.
you can check any pair here, just change ZEC/BTC to what pair you want to see.
https://marketdata.wavesplatform.com/api/trades/ZEC/BTC/100
hero member
Activity: 1540
Merit: 502
Waves Decentralized Exchange - 69
Ethfinex - 79
IDEX - 92
CryptoBridge - 116
Stellar Decentralized Exchange - 142

https://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/volume/24-hour/

i am sure that the decentralized exchangeare are the future. Waves has a nice dex .it's a matter of time of the people adopting thıs . and when it so far, a lot of users of bct wıll bump their head to the wall . due missiıng the chance to buy thıs coın cheaply ( atm 32k sats ..... )

jr. member
Activity: 49
Merit: 1
Waves Decentralized Exchange - 69
Ethfinex - 79
IDEX - 92
CryptoBridge - 116
Stellar Decentralized Exchange - 142

https://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/volume/24-hour/
almost all trading in waves dex are wash trading.

I kind of suspect this is true as well! (Wash trading meaning you buy/sell to yourself to create fake volume)
Unlike other exchanges though, all trades on the DEX are on the blockchain, so it's possible to decode the to/from addresses from the transaction data. In other words, this theory could be proven easily. Who wants to know what % of trades on the DEX are wash trading? Cheesy
jr. member
Activity: 49
Merit: 1
the team worked rapidly and efficiently to assume the problem:

https://forum.wavesplatform.com/t/wavesplatform-com-dns-hijacking-retrospective/1227

thanks for explanation.

I really appreciate that detailed report of what happened. As I was following it carefully, all I can say is that updates would have been better as it happened, rather than posting such an alarming warning and then taking it down with no further updates for a long time.... Anyways, glad it turned out ok and that the hackers weren't as competent as they could have been Wink
full member
Activity: 322
Merit: 101
Waves Decentralized Exchange - 69
Ethfinex - 79
IDEX - 92
CryptoBridge - 116
Stellar Decentralized Exchange - 142

https://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/volume/24-hour/
almost all trading in waves dex are wash trading.
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1055
Waves Decentralized Exchange - 69
Ethfinex - 79
IDEX - 92
CryptoBridge - 116
Stellar Decentralized Exchange - 142

https://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/volume/24-hour/
full member
Activity: 240
Merit: 101

I'm sure Namecoin has been studied by the Emer-team when they started in 2013, don't know how much they have changed the concept. I forgot Namecoin is still around.
member
Activity: 532
Merit: 50
ONe Social Network.
So FariPoS is activated on main net? https://twitter.com/wavesplatform/status/1022846506766880768. There's a paper about that ( forum.wavesplatform.com/uploads/default/original/1X/b9f220c13f73c3a41dff7f4523c6c4a1fc03ebf6.pdf ) but it's quite technical, can anyone ELI5 me please?

https://twitter.com/KardanovInal/status/1022845965924016134

To let know how it works for this you have to wait till dev will announce details about this algo. Everyone is interested to know about this new implementation on mainnet. Stay tuned to topic or join telegram channel for fast update.

As I said there's already a detalied paper about FairPoS, which I linked in previous post. Since I'm not technical, and that paper is technical as hell, I just asked if someone can "translate" it into a language I can understand Grin
hero member
Activity: 1928
Merit: 538
full member
Activity: 240
Merit: 101
hero member
Activity: 1928
Merit: 538
the team worked rapidly and efficiently to assume the problem:

https://forum.wavesplatform.com/t/wavesplatform-com-dns-hijacking-retrospective/1227

thanks for explanation.
YES,quickly reply and solution.
Decentralized DNS NEEDED.

EmcDNS ?? (Emercoins uncensored DNS)

can you explain ?
full member
Activity: 240
Merit: 101
the team worked rapidly and efficiently to assume the problem:

https://forum.wavesplatform.com/t/wavesplatform-com-dns-hijacking-retrospective/1227

thanks for explanation.
YES,quickly reply and solution.
Decentralized DNS NEEDED.

EmcDNS ?? (Emercoins uncensored DNS)
full member
Activity: 187
Merit: 100
the team worked rapidly and efficiently to assume the problem:

https://forum.wavesplatform.com/t/wavesplatform-com-dns-hijacking-retrospective/1227

thanks for explanation.
YES,quickly reply and solution.
Decentralized DNS NEEDED.
member
Activity: 402
Merit: 45
the team worked rapidly and efficiently to assume the problem:

https://forum.wavesplatform.com/t/wavesplatform-com-dns-hijacking-retrospective/1227

thanks for explanation.
Jump to: