Topic: WAVES PLATFORM VS ETH PLATFORM - page 20. (Read 37406 times)
ETH any day. Waves allows exchange compared to ETH but it's as good as dumping your coins for a price that's equal to NIL and there are so many shortcomings in the Waves platform. One can create any token on waves and then scam users by having similar token names. Sometimes they give an error while creating an order even though one has a waves balance. Their support is more responsive than the ETH platform but I prefer ETH with its simple to use interface. ICOs with waves platform mainly fail (example uooMAG) while ETH ICOs have mainly been successful due to their popularity. Waves is developing slowly but they need to make all their features work well so that people start adopting it on a larger scale.
I like both, but ETH has made a lot of progress and right now it's $260 with a marketcap of @24 billion. It means that if you want to make your money 2x with ETH, you must wait for it to get to $520, with a marketcap of $48B. Well, good luck with that...
Waves is not as big as ETH yet, but when it becomes big it will give a much better profit.
Waves is not as big as ETH yet, but when it becomes big it will give a much better profit.
WAVES platform its so simple for make a new name token , market slowly.
ETH Platform its so nice for smartcontract because prosess registration very difficult than WAVES , I have never, maybe not know, the token generated from the successful WAVES smart contract, if ETH is very much.
Waves and Eth platform are good but mostly used is Eth than waves. Eth is very easy to use and to trade with exchange but in waves since new others kinda hard to use their exchange. ETH Platform its so nice for smartcontract because prosess registration very difficult than WAVES , I have never, maybe not know, the token generated from the successful WAVES smart contract, if ETH is very much.
WAVES platform its so simple for make a new name token , market slowly.
ETH Platform its so nice for smartcontract because prosess registration very difficult than WAVES , I have never, maybe not know, the token generated from the successful WAVES smart contract, if ETH is very much.
ETH Platform its so nice for smartcontract because prosess registration very difficult than WAVES , I have never, maybe not know, the token generated from the successful WAVES smart contract, if ETH is very much.
i buy and hold both. but i think waves has more potential and will grow. its undervalued.
I used to think that. Now I think it's overvalued until the upgrades come on board. Also with the implementation of using *any* coin for txn fees, the economic incentive to running a node is greatly diminished. It is not profitable for nodes to run. Hence why you have <100 nodes trying to pretend that they're "decentralized" <100 nodes run the entire Waves network.
You cannot compare between Waves and Ethereum, as long as I know it is totally different , the Wave not a smart contract while Ethereum platform with the ERC20 tokens.
This is correct. But the smart contract will be available soon for waves. The big advantage are the low fees for transactions and the speed.
The speed is only great right now due to low number of users. Even with <100k users the network gets clogged often. Currently it can only process a maximum of 100 transactions per minute.
100 txs/min is slow AF.
i buy and hold both. but i think waves has more potential and will grow. its undervalued.
From what I've seen, Waves is trying to be the Jack of all Trades. Have all the features.
Problem is.... "Jack of all trades, master of none."
It's better to specialize. Ether allows for unique, specialized solutions to blockchain problems, Waves does not. With Ether someone can develop a solution and implement immediately. With Waves you're stuck with the Centralized developers deciding if/when they may or may not implement the solution.
Also the DEX is not a DEX. It has a necessarily centralized component to it, the matcher node, blessed by the Devs, normies cannot run matcher nodes. A simple DDOS attack on the central master node and you can take down the whole DEX. Ox protocol is a much, much better and more elegant solution. Brings us back to my previous point. With Ether you can build solutions on top of the chain. With Waves you have to wait for the central planners to decide if a feature is really needed.
Problem is.... "Jack of all trades, master of none."
It's better to specialize. Ether allows for unique, specialized solutions to blockchain problems, Waves does not. With Ether someone can develop a solution and implement immediately. With Waves you're stuck with the Centralized developers deciding if/when they may or may not implement the solution.
Also the DEX is not a DEX. It has a necessarily centralized component to it, the matcher node, blessed by the Devs, normies cannot run matcher nodes. A simple DDOS attack on the central master node and you can take down the whole DEX. Ox protocol is a much, much better and more elegant solution. Brings us back to my previous point. With Ether you can build solutions on top of the chain. With Waves you have to wait for the central planners to decide if a feature is really needed.
You cannot compare between Waves and Ethereum, as long as I know it is totally different , the Wave not a smart contract while Ethereum platform with the ERC20 tokens.
This is correct. But the smart contract will be available soon for waves. The big advantage are the low fees for transactions and the speed.
Waves does seem as an entrance-level platform for me, for small projects of founders not really into blockchain staff.
Ethereum is more capable and wide-functional but requires more expertise. It is more useful for big blockchain projects which do not need their blockchain but use other ETH functionality.
Ethereum is more capable and wide-functional but requires more expertise. It is more useful for big blockchain projects which do not need their blockchain but use other ETH functionality.
Adding Waves DEX in TabTrader soon, another great news !
https://twitter.com/tabtraderbtc/status/909326609844490240
https://twitter.com/tabtraderbtc/status/909326609844490240
I've seen that these two smart contracts are often used, and the ETH is widely used more often than WAVES. What is the difference between the two platforms?
Ethereum most often used in the ICO altcoin campaign, every time I check it out in the bounties then Waves few only and sometimes being used in the Bitcoin campaign. 
And it's written on Java mostly, so that is also an advantage above ethereum. Nevertheless, I believe that waves will never beat eth if both stay alive, because eth is just too popular already and people trust it more.
Waves runs on a JVM but it is written in Go. Anyhow, there is no Waves VS Eth - they are completely different types of platform pitching for very different space in the crypto platform field.
Smart contracts are coming on the Waves platform but, unlike Eth dApps, they are not 100% Turing complete - they are not competing and are aiming at different sectors who have different requirements. In my view Eth and Waves will be the two dominant platforms in the medium term.
ETH -> save investment
WAVES -> greater risk than eth but on the ther hand possibly more gains
As an Investor you have to choose.
WAVES -> greater risk than eth but on the ther hand possibly more gains
As an Investor you have to choose.
Both of them have different advantages but if we talking about smart contract, reilability and power, ETH is definitely better than Waves.
But it is easier and simple to use Waves.
Althought, according to roadmap, Waves going to grow and will have good future.
But it is easier and simple to use Waves.
Althought, according to roadmap, Waves going to grow and will have good future.
Waves roadmap seem visionary to me.
With that NG protocol it'll be more attractive and the dex with gui.
The idea is no. But Ethereum is more focused on Internet projects, and the waves on a real company.
I believe that the ethereum platform with the ERC20 tokens give more credibility to the project
This is certainly sure for the moment, but it is a pity, because waves is a more user friendly interface. The day that waves should add smart contracts features the game could change.
I somehow share the same sentiment with you. The sad thing is that Etherium is the main actor for now. I remember some other tokens that started off with Waves that shifted eventually to ERC20 tokens. The support that will come is bigger I think with ETH.
Ethereum is better. Many ICO had launched on this platform. It's can work well with many transaction.
Both of them have different advantages but if we talking about smart contract, reilability and power, ETH is definitely better than Waves.
But it is easier and simple to use Waves.
Althought, according to roadmap, Waves going to grow and will have good future.
But it is easier and simple to use Waves.
Althought, according to roadmap, Waves going to grow and will have good future.
You can read this to better understand the difference:
https://medium.com/@encryptotel/encryptotel-why-waves-and-why-ethereum-fe3bc7955f1e
https://medium.com/@encryptotel/encryptotel-why-waves-and-why-ethereum-fe3bc7955f1e
Jump to: