WAVES PLATFORM VS ETH PLATFORM - page 21.

solarrobot

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: kryptqnick on September 21, 2017, 02:01:45 AM

Quote from: mangodream on September 20, 2017, 05:52:41 PM

Waves is just the opposite to ETH probably. What ETH do is develop Bitcoin scripting, do everything using contracts, it’s very fundamental but makes certain things very complicated. Waves took another road, where things are simpler, very easy to add all functionality you need using plug-ins, don’t have to code complicated contracts. Also waves focus is on mass adoption, specifically target two markets : fiat transfers on blockchain and crowdfunding on blockchain. They are very ripe for disruption, and waves will be offering a product for a very general audience, basically the main end-user client is just a plugin you can install from Chrome.

Thanks, I guess this is a very good explanation. Waves is indeed easier to use, there're even videos on youtube showing how easy it is to create a token on this platform. And it's written on Java mostly, so that is also an advantage above ethereum. Nevertheless, I believe that waves will never beat eth if both stay alive, because eth is just too popular already and people trust it more.

Being written in JAVA might have it's advantages... but definitely not a flat out advantage. I'm interested to know what types of functionality will be added to waves with smart contracts, and how they intend to achieve this. Are the smart contracts on or off chain does any one know?

Dutchyyy

legendary

Activity: 1197

Merit: 1001

From investment point of view, WAVES is better as the price is far away from the full potential. On the other side, ETH price pick was half a year ago.

From development point of view, ETH is better as have much better adoption and acceptance.

evergrow

sr. member

Activity: 426

Merit: 256

There's a lot in the pipeline both for Waves and ETH, Ethereum Metropolis is coming and Waves is getting ready for its next release as well. Cool!

pambud

full member

Activity: 360

Merit: 100

You cannot compare between Waves and Ethereum, as long as I know it is totally different , the Wave not a smart contract while Ethereum platform with the ERC20 tokens.

mmfiore

hero member

Activity: 808

Merit: 502

For me, the ecosystem of Ethereum is clearly better. Many 3.0 crypto companies raise on this currency.

Smart Contract with Smart Token of Bancor are really powerful.
Look the system of Taas for smart contract ,

and many others. REGA sharing Risk also have both soon. (Bancor+Ethereum)

Future for Ether are great, but Waves have a nice way to do when i look on this roadmap.

Answer at Q1 2018.

ludbega

hero member

Activity: 854

Merit: 659

The All-in-One Cryptocurrency Exchange

Quote from: Lucky_U on September 21, 2017, 01:52:29 AM

Waves platform is more simple and development is too slow.
In October Waves will lunch Waves Client 1.0 and Waves NG protocol.

Thanks God,
Finally an informed person. !Nice to meet you !

Frankly, this conversation is indecent. Waves is clearly not at the end of his pretensions where Ether shows signs of fatigue.

For me both have their reason to be but the competition with the two will only begin: D Waves is likely to be an all-in-one sad enough for Ethereum. (Which I am always curious to measure integrity)

JasonXG

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 500

I don't know. I support both. ETH needs some competition and that is what waves is doing. Maybe its the next ETH ? Will it increase in value like ETH did ? Who knows, but I guess we will find out soon.

Lately there are so many ETH platform based tokens coming out all the time.

kryptqnick

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1402

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Quote from: mangodream on September 20, 2017, 05:52:41 PM

Waves is just the opposite to ETH probably. What ETH do is develop Bitcoin scripting, do everything using contracts, it’s very fundamental but makes certain things very complicated. Waves took another road, where things are simpler, very easy to add all functionality you need using plug-ins, don’t have to code complicated contracts. Also waves focus is on mass adoption, specifically target two markets : fiat transfers on blockchain and crowdfunding on blockchain. They are very ripe for disruption, and waves will be offering a product for a very general audience, basically the main end-user client is just a plugin you can install from Chrome.

Thanks, I guess this is a very good explanation. Waves is indeed easier to use, there're even videos on youtube showing how easy it is to create a token on this platform. And it's written on Java mostly, so that is also an advantage above ethereum. Nevertheless, I believe that waves will never beat eth if both stay alive, because eth is just too popular already and people trust it more.

Lucky_U

full member

Activity: 364

Merit: 100

Waves platform is more simple and development is too slow.
In October Waves will lunch Waves Client 1.0 and Waves NG protocol.

bittraffic

hero member

Activity: 3038

Merit: 617

There had been a lot of ICOs under WAVES platform already and tokens were released using the mass pay feature of the platform which is why waves can somehow take a huge market, it has its own ecosystem with a whole kid of tokens that will soon also be as big as ETH. Both are all platforms the only difference is that ETH was created the first.

Beicin

full member

Activity: 182

Merit: 100

They are vastly different from one another, you can't even compare the two. Ethereum aims to be EVERYTHING basically, while Waves is pretty limited as a platform to issue tokens.

sweerty1

sr. member

Activity: 453

Merit: 251

Presale Starting May 1st

Currently Ether platform is million years better. Waves is just simpler platform. Also they are going to follow ether's road to smart contract (I suppose). Waves is going to be good for sure but Eth is too big already.

Sullivan456

newbie

Activity: 32

Merit: 0

I think it's intended purpose is supposed to be making token creation on their chain very easy. I suppose that puts them in direct competition with Ethereum and some of the Eth token ICOs.
However, there's projects like Zrcoin that are both tokens on ETH and on WAVES. So I think the business case is that if you want to create tokens very quickly - use Waves. If you want to do more complex things with the tokens (like using Solidity) - you could later somehow bridge your tokens between both Waves and Ethereum. I think the biggest unseen use case from that might be the commodities market, maybe even product inventories for companies at some stage.

leea-1334

hero member

Activity: 2352

Merit: 953

Temporary forum vacation

Quote from: arthurbonora on September 20, 2017, 03:43:58 PM

I believe that the ethereum platform with the ERC20 tokens give more credibility to the project

Not necessarily. Do you know that the majority of ICO scams are actually using ERC20 tokens? Did you know that Ethereum is now more popular than Bitcoin as the crypto currency of choice for criminal activities (just behind Monero)?

Of course, this doesn't mean ETH is bad, just as Bitcoin wasn't bad even if terrorists use it, but if you're saying that simply using ERC20 gives the project credibility, I highly doubt it. WAVES has a verified token system that works by some verification of the creators and project. I trust that much more!

hermawanda

full member

Activity: 158

Merit: 100

eth platform is very better, eth have a bigger communty compared waves

peschi

sr. member

Activity: 355

Merit: 250

Quote from: Adykingcity on September 20, 2017, 10:36:26 PM

Quote from: peschi on September 20, 2017, 03:42:03 PM

Quote from: Adykingcity on September 20, 2017, 03:18:34 PM

I've seen that these two smart contracts are often used, and the ETH is widely used more often than WAVES. What is the difference between the two platforms?

Waves is not a smart contract plattform - it is a plattform to issue tokens on a very, very simple way (tokens dont have any functionality).

Waves also has a so called DEX (decentralised exchange), where you can trade the tokens of the waves plattform.

means the ETH token is more complex than the token of the waves.

Quote from: xaxistech on September 20, 2017, 05:31:04 PM

It is more interesting when an ICO is using a Ethereum contract, waves is a very good project, and their dex is very good too, but it is difficult to use it since it is a little big buggy. But i see that a lot of ICO's are using Waves technology to develop their coins, and a lot of them are having success. I think that more people needs to accostumbrate to use Waves, it is a very promising one, and a new way to develop coins.

Some people are more happy to use waves and some are using ETH, but I see many more ETH enthusiasts

Quote from: bitkanu on September 20, 2017, 05:33:15 PM

Quote from: Adykingcity on September 20, 2017, 03:18:34 PM

I've seen that these two smart contracts are often used, and the ETH is widely used more often than WAVES. What is the difference between the two platforms?

The ethereum was having the more complex code rather than waves platform, as far as i know a lot of the exchange sites was easily to added the ethereum token rather than the waves assets and that makes the waves just look a crap for me.

Like MGO they have a problem on their wallet, which you say is very true

Quote from: mangodream on September 20, 2017, 05:52:41 PM

Waves is just the opposite to ETH probably. What ETH do is develop Bitcoin scripting, do everything using contracts, it’s very fundamental but makes certain things very complicated. Waves took another road, where things are simpler, very easy to add all functionality you need using plug-ins, don’t have to code complicated contracts. Also waves focus is on mass adoption, specifically target two markets : fiat transfers on blockchain and crowdfunding on blockchain. They are very ripe for disruption, and waves will be offering a product for a very general audience, basically the main end-user client is just a plugin you can install from Chrome.

But look at waves have no enthusiasts at all, most people prefer to use ETH.
Facts speak

I think its not about enthusiasts - its about the project needs.
If you need a complex smart contract, then got to ETH or an other blockchain which is providing it.

Waves is for simple Tokens with no functionality. You need 1 minute to issue your tokens.

Sungoku

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 257

if you look at the battle between the ethereum platform and waves I think the win is ethereum,
why? because the ethereum is in great demand by the masses

qchain

jr. member

Activity: 31

Merit: 100

Waves is simpler and smaller than ETH. Basically it is kind of cheaper version of ETH, that is useful for small platforms to kickstart Wink

Adykingcity

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

Quote from: peschi on September 20, 2017, 03:42:03 PM

Quote from: Adykingcity on September 20, 2017, 03:18:34 PM

I've seen that these two smart contracts are often used, and the ETH is widely used more often than WAVES. What is the difference between the two platforms?

Waves is not a smart contract plattform - it is a plattform to issue tokens on a very, very simple way (tokens dont have any functionality).

Waves also has a so called DEX (decentralised exchange), where you can trade the tokens of the waves plattform.

means the ETH token is more complex than the token of the waves.

Quote from: xaxistech on September 20, 2017, 05:31:04 PM

It is more interesting when an ICO is using a Ethereum contract, waves is a very good project, and their dex is very good too, but it is difficult to use it since it is a little big buggy. But i see that a lot of ICO's are using Waves technology to develop their coins, and a lot of them are having success. I think that more people needs to accostumbrate to use Waves, it is a very promising one, and a new way to develop coins.

Some people are more happy to use waves and some are using ETH, but I see many more ETH enthusiasts

Quote from: bitkanu on September 20, 2017, 05:33:15 PM

Quote from: Adykingcity on September 20, 2017, 03:18:34 PM

I've seen that these two smart contracts are often used, and the ETH is widely used more often than WAVES. What is the difference between the two platforms?

The ethereum was having the more complex code rather than waves platform, as far as i know a lot of the exchange sites was easily to added the ethereum token rather than the waves assets and that makes the waves just look a crap for me.

Like MGO they have a problem on their wallet, which you say is very true

Quote from: mangodream on September 20, 2017, 05:52:41 PM

Waves is just the opposite to ETH probably. What ETH do is develop Bitcoin scripting, do everything using contracts, it’s very fundamental but makes certain things very complicated. Waves took another road, where things are simpler, very easy to add all functionality you need using plug-ins, don’t have to code complicated contracts. Also waves focus is on mass adoption, specifically target two markets : fiat transfers on blockchain and crowdfunding on blockchain. They are very ripe for disruption, and waves will be offering a product for a very general audience, basically the main end-user client is just a plugin you can install from Chrome.

But look at waves have no enthusiasts at all, most people prefer to use ETH.
Facts speak

mangodream

hero member

Activity: 672

Merit: 501

Waves is just the opposite to ETH probably. What ETH do is develop Bitcoin scripting, do everything using contracts, it’s very fundamental but makes certain things very complicated. Waves took another road, where things are simpler, very easy to add all functionality you need using plug-ins, don’t have to code complicated contracts. Also waves focus is on mass adoption, specifically target two markets : fiat transfers on blockchain and crowdfunding on blockchain. They are very ripe for disruption, and waves will be offering a product for a very general audience, basically the main end-user client is just a plugin you can install from Chrome.

Topic: WAVES PLATFORM VS ETH PLATFORM - page 21. (Read 37437 times)