Topic: We are only rich on spreadsheets - page 13. (Read 15257 times)
not all of the projects are bad, and also the funds they allocate I think are sufficient, it's just that the participants are too large so the number of prizes becomes small. That is, you have to count the number of participants and prizes before joining.
Probably you are just saying that, because your expecting too much on it. But for the people here who knows the cycle happening in cryptocurrency it doesn't mean the price is 1$ of each token while the project campaign was in progress it means true, of course not!
I know when it comes to the actual price in the market that won't do happen most of the time.
I know when it comes to the actual price in the market that won't do happen most of the time.
The main goal of the bounty hunter is to attract new investors to join the project that we are promoting, even though the costs given are not what we expected, bounty hunters are given an average funding allocation of around 1-5%.
Even that's based on the allocation but the result will always different from the price that has already expected by the developers. the developers must have started to consider to replace it with stable coin to give guarantee to the hunters.
For me it's better than nothing, we get so disappointed because we expect too much in return. And it's up to you if you still want to remain, remember it's just free token from the task we've done.
all depends on the price of the token at the time of the first launch, because the average token after distribution will be discarded, making the bounty hunter disappointed because the results obtained are too few, so it is natural to think of spreadsheet rich and poor after distribution.
You're right my friend, They use bounty hunters as tools to carry out their deceitful action and sometimes as cheap promotional options. I taught bounty programs was no more, however, I see bounty threads always.
My thoughts are as the same as yours. We are expecting good profits in our spreadsheet yet when the reality comes, what we could earn is just 10 percent of what we see in our spreadsheet or sometimes turns into nothing because of not all projects are successful. We just hope that next time we join a bounty project we earn what we expect or what we see on our spreadsheet.
This often happens because the project is not listed on the exchanger so we cannot sell it or because the price of the token falls after listing on the exchanger. Many new projects have dropped more than 50% from the ICO / IEO price and I think it's true that we are only rich in spreadsheets
Yes, its harsh truth about the current bounty campaign situation. Bounty hunters do hard work for the bounties but they never get paid as per their wish, every time hunters need to get adjusted as per their rewards. One of the worst-case scenarios for the hunters is when they realize their project is a scam.
My thoughts are as the same as yours. We are expecting good profits in our spreadsheet yet when the reality comes, what we could earn is just 10 percent of what we see in our spreadsheet or sometimes turns into nothing because of not all projects are successful. We just hope that next time we join a bounty project we earn what we expect or what we see on our spreadsheet.
This often happens because the project is not listed on the exchanger so we cannot sell it or because the price of the token falls after listing on the exchanger. Many new projects have dropped more than 50% from the ICO / IEO price and I think it's true that we are only rich in spreadsheets
The main goal of the bounty hunter is to attract new investors to join the project that we are promoting, even though the costs given are not what we expected, bounty hunters are given an average funding allocation of around 1-5%.
The problem is that the price of the token, the Bounty hunter can receive 1-5% of the total supply, but the price of the token collapses many times over the ICO price. And actually bounty hunters only get a few cents for their work, there are even a lot of scam campaigns and not distributed to participants.
The only thing that makes a bounty project becomes very valuable even after bounty hunters are paid is the (interest) of investors, another one is demand and supply, not all projects are crap, most bounty campaigns are big disappointments but not all bounties, few projects will always prove this wrong.. I still remember tachyon, Velas, Cartesi,Harmony, they are damn good
Projects that introduced bounty campaigns have every right to protect themselves and avoid dump, it's still fair enough if distribution are split up, one thing that top exchange projects has is maintain good value than others that will dump faster, not getting paid at all is what I'm so against
That seems to be one of the strategies used by the project team, but it will not last long when the tokens are already in the exchange, I have seen 2 projects that implement this, but price reductions still occur from day to day, projects that what I see is E3T and AG8, the two tokens have never experienced a sharp price increase even though the team did the distribution in stages to the bounty participants.
Projects that introduced bounty campaigns have every right to protect themselves and avoid dump, it's still fair enough if distribution are split up, one thing that top exchange projects has is maintain good value than others that will dump faster, not getting paid at all is what I'm so against
it all depends on the price of the token after it is launched because there are so many tokens left behind and even left to die, but if the price of the token is distributed according to price, you will definitely smile for yourself when selling it 
Sometimes your calculated stakes might never reached you, seeing them on spreadsheet might be the last that's why is not good to get your hopes up because of spreadsheet, many bounty projects will definitely disappoint us, wait till you get received your tokens in your wallet before you start jubilating
The main goal of the bounty hunter is to attract new investors to join the project that we are promoting, even though the costs given are not what we expected, bounty hunters are given an average funding allocation of around 1-5%.
that is if the team pays the agreed allocation. some projects are not like that, they make new rules by cutting the allocation that was set from the beginning. if I'm not mistaken the 2local project also does it for their phase 1 bounty participants. all bounty signature participants seem to get the same number of tokens and that is very much smaller than the allocation given.
The main goal of the bounty hunter is to attract new investors to join the project that we are promoting, even though the costs given are not what we expected, bounty hunters are given an average funding allocation of around 1-5%.
My thoughts are as the same as yours. We are expecting good profits in our spreadsheet yet when the reality comes, what we could earn is just 10 percent of what we see in our spreadsheet or sometimes turns into nothing because of not all projects are successful. We just hope that next time we join a bounty project we earn what we expect or what we see on our spreadsheet.
Personally, I think it's the risk that we have to accept when we join a bounty project. Even though we try our best to reduce the risk of being scammed by doing good research, gathering good information, finding a trusted project, we can't control the rewards. It all depends on the team. The only thing we could do is keep up and do our job! 
I think it is because the market itself is not good for trading. And you should remember that free money, we can start a good journey in this cryptocurrency if they do not have money to invest. It's a big way of advertising your project, maybe you're wrong to choose a bonus.
Yes, that's what bounties these days make us. They show us big big rewards on their spreadsheets but the real values of those rewards they offer us are sometimes not even up to $5 on the market. I feel bounty hunters are only being used as baits by project owners to catch their investors virtually for free. What do you think guys ?
I also think like you because that's the general reality. I have done a lot of projects before, and the worst project will pay me tokens and still sell them at a low price. And now there are so many scam projects and they don't even pay tokens and close the telegram channel. The reason is that the recession and investment volume at ICO or IEO have also decreased significantly, so there are very few good projects now. We have to get used to this or have to look for a new job.It's why we need to be careful in which bounty we are joining. Now when we know how scam bounties operate, we can use that knowledge and try to do good research before we join! Scam bounties will always be here, even with good research there's no guarantees, with the risk we are promoting some projects and we hope for the best, but the risk is always there, be aware of that and try to not get disappointed if you make a mistake, learn from mistakes and try next time with better preparation.
Jump to: