But furthermore, you still fail to acknowledge my point that the price of bitcoin has risen FAR faster than its intrinsic value. Bitcoin hasn't intrinsically become 1200% more valuable in the past 2 years. Sure there are a few more places that it can be spent, but that doesn't mean it is worth 1200% more. This is the only point that matters, not your graph. The value of bitcoin is far below the current price, regardless of what technical indicators may or may not suggest that the price will do.
you can have the exact same amount of intrinsic value, though there isn't much or any, and still have the price soar down to one thing and one thing only - more people want in. that's it. and there are many, many, many more people who will want in in the future.
That's the point I'm making. If the price soars and the value doesn't, you create this big disparity that cannot sustain itself forever. Like I mentioned earlier, it's like stretching a rubber band. Everything must come down to reality eventually, or grow into its price. With bitcoin, it's likely to be a combination of both but weighted more heavily on the coming down to reality side.
Well, you are clearly having hard time to understand what bitcoin is about, what it has enabled, how useful it is, what potential it has and so on. I can't have a debate with someone like you about bitcoin anyway because anything i say will lead to a dead end on your side.
Just one question. How would you price bitcoin right now, if you were able to name a price freely?
100$?
1000$?
10k$?
100k$?
500k$?
1million$?
Just pick one. If you can't pick a price from the list above, then you should just stay quiet.
What are you talking about? How is your comment here at all related to what you quoted? I completely understand bitcoin's potential and I've been following it for many years now, since well before the last bubble. I don't see how you can say that everything you say leads to a dead end on my side when I have rebutted every point you've made. You aren't making any sense here.
I'm going to answer your question by changing it to a better question, because the one you asked is on the right track but you phrased it poorly. You should really be asking what I think the market cap for bitcoin should be, which is still a difficult question to answer, but I will give it a shot. For the record though, I do not need to be able to pinpoint a value for an asset in order to tell you that it is over or under valued. That is not how finance works. You seem to have a pretty simplistic view of all of this.
Anyway, Bitcoin's market cap is currently roughly $40 billion. When Bitcoin's price skyrocketed in 2013, its market cap went from roughly $1 billion to $12 billion, and finally settled around $3.5 billion, where it stayed the most stable Bitcoin has remained over a 9 month period in a while. It pretty much stayed flat, as a currency should. I would argue that this is where the intrinsic value of bitcoin was at that time - around $250 or so per coin. This means that the events which pushed bitcoin up by 12x in 2013 really reflected only a 3.5x increase in bitcoin's value. The implication is that the bitcoin market likes to push the price up by about 3.43x (12 / 3.5) the amount that the value goes up by.
This now begs the question, where is the top of the current bubble? This is hard to say, so let's work with a range - let's say it is somewhere between $4,000 and $8,000. This means that the market cap would be between roughly $67 billion and $134 billion at the peak, and would imply an increase of somewhere between 5.6 and 11.2 times, assuming we mark the start of the bubble where the peak of the 2013 bubble was ($12 billion market cap). To find where bitcoin should be, we just divide these numbers by 3.43 (the amount by which investors tend to overbuy bitcoin) and multiply them by the market cap. The result is a range of $19.6 billion to $39.2 billion,
which means the price of bitcoin should currently be between roughly $1,190 and $2,380.So yeah that's a really big range, but it's hard to be precise. It is highly likely that bitcoin will fall on the lower end of that range when it finally settles. The higher end would only be likely if we see the price shoot up to around $8,000 in the next couple months.
BOTTOM LINE:Anyway just to simplify all of this for you, in case you didn't bother to read it or you just dismissed it because you didn't understand it, we calculated that investors overestimated the increase in value of bitcoin by about 3.43 during the 2013 bubble. The degree to which investors overestimate the increase in value is not likely to be different this time. As a result, it is highly unlikely that the real value of bitcoin is greater than $2400, and more likely that it is closer to $1200-$1500 ish.