Topic: What affects your decision to take part in a Bounty Campaign? - page 4. (Read 2128 times)
I personally do not think much about joining the bounty campaign, including rewards. I think that this is a gift (really a gift) because we get paid from bounty for our hard work. when I see a bounty, and still accept pasrtisipan, then I will immediately join for my first decision.
How do you know if this manager has a great reputation or not?
Thank you very much for your fast reply. I will focus my attention on these factors at the moment of deciding if finally take part in the bounty campaign or not. There are so many factors that actually do affect the decision.
Thank you very much
Hello everyone!
I faced several Bounty campaigns and I have seen a lot of them with pretty similar conditions and requirements to participate. When I had a look at their Spreadsheets, I have found that the number of bounty hunters is different! There was a huge difference between the number of participants and the date of Bounty Campaign launch was the same (there was a difference of several dates between the launch dates). Their ideas were great, very promising, and the relationship between community managers and their community was excellent: great potential investors attention, fast replies, polite and useful explanations...
My question is: "What makes you choose one Bounty campaign and not another? What are the key factors that highly influence your decision? What are you looking for at the first sight and what do you expect from it before starting your participation and register in the Bounty?
(Don't know if this or similar topic exists, I haven't found one, sorry if it's already created)
I don't think anyone's ever faced a situation like yours. Most people have their own evaluation system. Using which they find a suitable bounty and follow it. Rare cases when a person is looking for a good bounty with a small number of participants I faced several Bounty campaigns and I have seen a lot of them with pretty similar conditions and requirements to participate. When I had a look at their Spreadsheets, I have found that the number of bounty hunters is different! There was a huge difference between the number of participants and the date of Bounty Campaign launch was the same (there was a difference of several dates between the launch dates). Their ideas were great, very promising, and the relationship between community managers and their community was excellent: great potential investors attention, fast replies, polite and useful explanations...
My question is: "What makes you choose one Bounty campaign and not another? What are the key factors that highly influence your decision? What are you looking for at the first sight and what do you expect from it before starting your participation and register in the Bounty?
(Don't know if this or similar topic exists, I haven't found one, sorry if it's already created)
The thing is simple, I wuold always look on the team of developers, and if they had a succesful projects in a past - it is a good sign, that their new project would also have a success, maybe also the rank of a bounty manager affects it..
Why is everyone saying that the rank affects their decision? This is so unfair to the new bounty managers who have a great bounty campaign, but hasn't got a well-known reputation.
In my opinio, the structure of the bounty campaign matters
Some key factors are bounty manager's history, Whitepaper, Social activities and responsiveness, Participation number. These are the factors that I think need to be checked before joining bounty.
How do you know if this manager has a great reputation or not?
My question is: "What makes you choose one Bounty campaign and not another? What are the key factors that highly influence your decision? What are you looking for at the first sight and what do you expect from it before starting your participation and register in the Bounty?
Always choose the best according to your own liking and your own research. There are lots of projects that do have bounty programs which as a bounty hunter this would somehow a very tough decision for us to make.
Bounty hunters do have their own criteria on choosing but the most common advise you would able to hear out is that you should always seek out for projects potential ,like seeing its whitepaper, the team behind and the innovation or benefit of the project itself.
The best thing to do is to review the white paper to look if the project is legit. Even if the bounty is successful, if the project is not legit the bounty token will not have any value in the market. You should also look for a reliable bounty manager since lately there are bounty managers who are running with the bounty payments.
That's what I have faced, I didn't analyze the whitepaper, I mean, I haven't analyzed it deeply, I went through the idea and I liked it, then I decided to take part in its bounty campaign. I believe this was my mistake. Thank you very much
Like many others, my first priority is the bounty manager who is managing the campaign. I check out their post history, ranking and date of account creation to make sure whether that particular individual is worth trusting. Once I find a legit manager, I focus on factors like the whitepaper, development team experience(Don't care if they show their faces or not), social media interactions by the development team and number of participants along with the bounty fund allocation.
Wow! Pretty detailed explanation about the right way of making a decision about your participation in a bounty. Thank you very much for your answer. However, I think that the bounty manager's reputation is not a significant factor since I have seen managers who are unknown but the attention to the participants is excellent
For choosing bounty the key factor for me is participation number. I open their spreadsheet, count participants, see the token base price and bounty allocation and estimate stake then calculate how much I may gain.
To look for a number of participants seems to be a great way of finding our if the project's bounty campaign is demanded or not. çhow you can calculate the stakes if they depend on the number of tokens that others get?
Thank you very much for your advice
In my own opinion, I always look for the manager for his/her previous campaign if it's successful and also those Legendary manager like needmoney, ocalytus, sylon and many more. I also search the ICO if it's rated like 4.0 above look at the whitepaper, the road map if it's attainable.
Great, thank you very much for your opinion! Thank you for sharing your tactics and ways of choosing the right bounty campaign. çby the way, at which ICO ratings do you look for? Does the manager rank on Bitcointalk forum affects your decision?
Thank you very much for your reply
For choosing bounty the key factor for me is participation number. I open their spreadsheet, count participants, see the token base price and bounty allocation and estimate stake then calculate how much I may gain.
There's a few factors I look at. Quality of project is top. I don't want to waste my time with shitcoins that will never be listed or that won't reach soft cap. Bounty amount - I usually look for bounties that are offering around about $500k or more because when it is less that that you usually end up with a low payout due to number of participants. The bounty manager is important but not as important as picking a quality project. Any project that are offering a decent pool and already have guaranteed exchanges lined up are good to go for because even if the project starts to look bad it is easy to sell, but I initially join bounties with the intention of holding the tokens and waiting until way higher than ICO price and that is why picking quality projects is the most important
That's an interesting point, however, how do you analyze the quality? How do you look at it? There are projects that seem to be great ones but after some time, they resulted to be a SCAM. I am new in this industry, but I would like to hear opinions from the ones who have enough experience and confronted SCAMs
To begin with, I look at the managers with whom I worked successfully and there were good projects, then the interest in the bounty of the company and the project itself.
But if the manager of the campaign is not well-known yet? How do you value him and what do you expect from a good manager?
How do you know if the project is interested in bounty? As far as I have seen, all the ICOs are launching the bounty campaigns. Isn't it?
In my own opinion, I always look for the manager for his/her previous campaign if it's successful and also those Legendary manager like needmoney, ocalytus, sylon and many more. I also search the ICO if it's rated like 4.0 above look at the whitepaper, the road map if it's attainable.
Like many others, my first priority is the bounty manager who is managing the campaign. I check out their post history, ranking and date of account creation to make sure whether that particular individual is worth trusting. Once I find a legit manager, I focus on factors like the whitepaper, development team experience(Don't care if they show their faces or not), social media interactions by the development team and number of participants along with the bounty fund allocation.
The best thing to do is to review the white paper to look if the project is legit. Even if the bounty is successful, if the project is not legit the bounty token will not have any value in the market. You should also look for a reliable bounty manager since lately there are bounty managers who are running with the bounty payments.
Hello everyone!
I faced several Bounty campaigns and I have seen a lot of them with pretty similar conditions and requirements to participate. When I had a look at their Spreadsheets, I have found that the number of bounty hunters is different! There was a huge difference between the number of participants and the date of Bounty Campaign launch was the same (there was a difference of several dates between the launch dates). Their ideas were great, very promising, and the relationship between community managers and their community was excellent: great potential investors attention, fast replies, polite and useful explanations...
My question is: "What makes you choose one Bounty campaign and not another? What are the key factors that highly influence your decision? What are you looking for at the first sight and what do you expect from it before starting your participation and register in the Bounty?
(Don't know if this or similar topic exists, I haven't found one, sorry if it's already created)
I faced several Bounty campaigns and I have seen a lot of them with pretty similar conditions and requirements to participate. When I had a look at their Spreadsheets, I have found that the number of bounty hunters is different! There was a huge difference between the number of participants and the date of Bounty Campaign launch was the same (there was a difference of several dates between the launch dates). Their ideas were great, very promising, and the relationship between community managers and their community was excellent: great potential investors attention, fast replies, polite and useful explanations...
My question is: "What makes you choose one Bounty campaign and not another? What are the key factors that highly influence your decision? What are you looking for at the first sight and what do you expect from it before starting your participation and register in the Bounty?
(Don't know if this or similar topic exists, I haven't found one, sorry if it's already created)
I consider a lot of things when joining. First, I look at who is managing the campaign, since different bounty managers have their own rules and regulations in managing. Some managers take a lot of time on finishing spreadsheet which is one of the reasons why bounty payments are delayed. Another thing is the project it self, I choose project who has a good potential in succeeding in their ICO and getting in a good exchange.
The thing is simple, I wuold always look on the team of developers, and if they had a succesful projects in a past - it is a good sign, that their new project would also have a success, maybe also the rank of a bounty manager affects it..
first of all, my own opinion and intuition, when I go to the site, I immediately understand whether I like the project or not, if not, I immediately leave the site, and if I like, I start to study the product, look at the team (for me it is very important) then I study the white paper, then the road map, and I also important bounty Manager, because there are managers who cheat and do not lead the table and at the end of the company begins the turmoil. I don't like this and I love responsible bounty managers!
Jump to: