I personally look that it is not a scam first and then the quality and usability of the project itself.
Some good projects exists out there that might be really useful for mankind in a determined field for the future. However, it is extremely important to research the management team to see if they know what they're doing. The project could be really good, but the people in charge needs to make the right decisions also.
Hunting ICOs only for profits is really dangerous and i personally don't like that game. I support causes. The ones who get good at it can get big profits sometimes though.
Topic: What do you want from an ICO? - page 6. (Read 2179 times)
Maybe my opinion is not the same as you. For me, ICO is a good ICO as long as it gives me a high probability of making money. In fact, I don't really care about the products or background behind them. I use these conditions as a reference because if there is a strong background, then this token has the potential to make me profitable.
It is important for me that the ICO is transparent and available for analysis of participants and investors . The more money it will be invested the more successful the project will be .
Having taken some time to look at a number of ICO's in depth, it looks to me that a large number of them may be marketers first and developers second. They all seem to be great at selling a vision or product but when you actually start to scratch beneath the surface, you start to notice that they promise the impossible, if it sounds too good to be true then it probably is. That's not to say that all ICOs are like that, there's a number of very well thought out and genuine ones.
So my question is, what do you want from an ICO with regards to its presentation and what they offer? Is having a working demo or MVP the most important? Is it all about the team or does that not matter if they've already demonstrated their competence? Do you want the ICO team to generate hype and "oversell" or would you rather a more honest and direct approach?
So my question is, what do you want from an ICO with regards to its presentation and what they offer? Is having a working demo or MVP the most important? Is it all about the team or does that not matter if they've already demonstrated their competence? Do you want the ICO team to generate hype and "oversell" or would you rather a more honest and direct approach?
Do we live in the perfect world? If yes, then kind of same things what shares on the stock market offers. Dividends. Oh, also that there would be liquidity and quarterly full reports of the company. Then, more people will have trust in such projects and the price will grow.
Also MVP I would say have to be a must to run an ICO and the team must be verified by the 3d party and big portion of funds escrow should freeze.
Most of the people invest in ICO to make money, and a very few people invest to help to start a new project. Basically, I invested in ico to make money, though i stopped investing because of this bull market.
I want the successful ico project and the token price will increase sharply when the floor. All are beneficial. Both ico buyers and bounty participants are happy.
The current ico problem when the market goes down but I believe ico is still good. And I want to ico will last
The current ico problem when the market goes down but I believe ico is still good. And I want to ico will last
I prefer a direct approach that has real work proof such as a test or launching an MVP, to gain trust and interest from investors.
Me i want in ico to make thier platform and roadmap become true. Because lot of ico today didnt success i dont know why maybe they are scam ico thats why there token didnt grow
I prefer a direct approach and supporting ICOs with working product. Of course, the vision is also important
but it is worth nothing if it is unrealistic or the Team is not capable to realize it. I am always following the
projects on Github as well to see how the development progressing.
but it is worth nothing if it is unrealistic or the Team is not capable to realize it. I am always following the
projects on Github as well to see how the development progressing.
Is having a working demo or MVP the most important? Is it all about the team or does that not matter if they've already demonstrated their competence? Do you want the ICO team to generate hype and "oversell" or would you rather a more honest and direct approach?
for me the most important thing in ico is honest and what it is. and is part of honesty is if they can show their prototype, this is a bit more proof that their project is real
Of course the profit from that ICO. But to get a profit, the ICO must be of good quality. Having good products and great ideas can help that ICO succeed
Of course it's very important that they promise to implement the developer projects. And if their goals are clearly overstated, or not very realistic, then I will skip such a project.
And it's good when there are already some developments or something has already been implemented and the project is aimed at supporting and further developing the product
And it's good when there are already some developments or something has already been implemented and the project is aimed at supporting and further developing the product
What I want from the ICO project is a good product and can help everyone in the future. everyone will want that and will help maintain the value of the project.
Before I buy into an ICO, I would usually check the team behind, the use case, and the community. Also it is a great plus if it has a prototype or MVP.
for me, it is important that the ICO shot well, so that there is a good excitement in order to attract more investors, the accessibility and openness of the project is not unimportant, everything should be sweaty and clean like glass.
Look for ICOs that have a working product/MVP or atleast an alpha/beta version or plans to release one in the near future.
I think all people including investors and founders want to earn money on ICO. The main thing in every ICO is a product but the end purpose is a money.
All those who participate in ICO want to create a profit on their investments, but the difficulty lies precisely in the choice of ICO, because there are projects that turn out to be a scam.
I hope the team has the right hype.
Because most of the time if have hyped ICO project, so can let me profit, and my requirement to ICO is obtain profit.
Because most of the time if have hyped ICO project, so can let me profit, and my requirement to ICO is obtain profit.
There are many different ways of making money in the crypto money world. Participation in ICO projects, which is the most significant of these.
If you invest in quality ICO projects, you can make good money. ICO projects are technologically scaled projects.
If you invest in quality ICO projects, you can make good money. ICO projects are technologically scaled projects.
Jump to: