Topic: What do you want from an ICO? - page 9. (Read 2179 times)
There are so many things that can help, like team, community, vision, project, tech, interactive feedback etc., and i think we should all study, communicate, clarify our doubts first before investing.
I want an ICO with a very great team and has a very good reputation in the market. Those that attract so much attention from big investors because of their great product. One ICO I know that has all those qualities is DCC. In Distributed Credit Chain, you would have access to your own credit score all the time instead of having to request your transactions or your own credit score from a company like Equifax. Each DCC user will have an identification card which is called DCCID. It stores all your credit information in a decentralized manner that can be accessed across the globe any time. Companies like DCC are creating safer financial institutions with Blockchain technology. I find their vision so promising.
In need of harmonious interaction with investors is a small value but shows their sincerity in bringing the vision and mission, Telegram channels can be a container in every renewal of a project activity. Looks simple but has more value in the eyes of investors.
Having taken some time to look at a number of ICO's in depth, it looks to me that a large number of them may be marketers first and developers second. They all seem to be great at selling a vision or product but when you actually start to scratch beneath the surface, you start to notice that they promise the impossible, if it sounds too good to be true then it probably is. That's not to say that all ICOs are like that, there's a number of very well thought out and genuine ones.
So my question is, what do you want from an ICO with regards to its presentation and what they offer? Is having a working demo or MVP the most important? Is it all about the team or does that not matter if they've already demonstrated their competence? Do you want the ICO team to generate hype and "oversell" or would you rather a more honest and direct approach?
Honestly, what I want from an ICO project is the benefits of investing in a project that has benefits in the future. I think MVP is a value added project that shows its seriousness. The team becomes very important in a project, the more competent or experienced, the greater the opportunity for the development of the project. So my question is, what do you want from an ICO with regards to its presentation and what they offer? Is having a working demo or MVP the most important? Is it all about the team or does that not matter if they've already demonstrated their competence? Do you want the ICO team to generate hype and "oversell" or would you rather a more honest and direct approach?
honestly I am more interested in ICO which is very open to its members. so the most important thing in a project for me is openness, price issues later we can both work hard so that the price can go up.
Having taken some time to look at a number of ICO's in depth, it looks to me that a large number of them may be marketers first and developers second. They all seem to be great at selling a vision or product but when you actually start to scratch beneath the surface, you start to notice that they promise the impossible, if it sounds too good to be true then it probably is. That's not to say that all ICOs are like that, there's a number of very well thought out and genuine ones.
So my question is, what do you want from an ICO with regards to its presentation and what they offer? Is having a working demo or MVP the most important? Is it all about the team or does that not matter if they've already demonstrated their competence? Do you want the ICO team to generate hype and "oversell" or would you rather a more honest and direct approach?
Have MVP can be considered as an additional value to the team and that means if the team is serious to developing the platform. But the majority of ico traders are aiming to get early hype of the ico itself. So my question is, what do you want from an ICO with regards to its presentation and what they offer? Is having a working demo or MVP the most important? Is it all about the team or does that not matter if they've already demonstrated their competence? Do you want the ICO team to generate hype and "oversell" or would you rather a more honest and direct approach?
Remember ONT gives every ico holders more than 70x from the ico price. Zill which around 65x from the ico price and that's they are looking for.
I want ICO that have a good presentation and have a big offer both investor and bounty. I think the team is also important with an honest and direct approach.
I am investing in an ICO just to make profit. Therefore I want a big hype for any ICO I want to invest because its that hype that will pump the price when it get listed on exchange. In term of the team behind a project I don't really see it as a factor that can pump coin in market.
So most of the time I pay more attention to the liquidity and heat of this token.
If the token has enough followers, there is a good chance it will make a profit from the project.
If the token has enough followers, there is a good chance it will make a profit from the project.
So is the token itself more important than whatever platform they want to build to use that token on? I guess that would make sense if you're investing to make a profit as it's the token that you hold that you would actually sell.
So most of the time I pay more attention to the liquidity and heat of this token.
If the token has enough followers, there is a good chance it will make a profit from the project.
If the token has enough followers, there is a good chance it will make a profit from the project.
Having taken some time to look at a number of ICO's in depth, it looks to me that a large number of them may be marketers first and developers second. They all seem to be great at selling a vision or product but when you actually start to scratch beneath the surface, you start to notice that they promise the impossible, if it sounds too good to be true then it probably is. That's not to say that all ICOs are like that, there's a number of very well thought out and genuine ones.
So my question is, what do you want from an ICO with regards to its presentation and what they offer? Is having a working demo or MVP the most important? Is it all about the team or does that not matter if they've already demonstrated their competence? Do you want the ICO team to generate hype and "oversell" or would you rather a more honest and direct approach?
So my question is, what do you want from an ICO with regards to its presentation and what they offer? Is having a working demo or MVP the most important? Is it all about the team or does that not matter if they've already demonstrated their competence? Do you want the ICO team to generate hype and "oversell" or would you rather a more honest and direct approach?
Jump to: