I always check their website and team as well. How about you guys? Do you go by suggestion or do you do research on the ICO?
I do research on what a particular project stand for and most time read the white paper of those projects. I have not been good in analyze the ico based on it teams though but reading comments made in the Ann thread of those ico and not only that but also on twitter and facebook. I think how a project is being promoted do also determined how well the project will perform after hitting the market. We should be also warn that 95% of the ico projects that has happened fail after one year! Therefore, you should not put all your egg in one basket. 
Topic: What makes you think that ICO is good? (Read 557 times)
Well i think it is better to read their white paper first to see what their project is all about. Next, do some research about their coin distribution and lastly, check the team governing the project it. A good team is a sign of success but not all the times 
Good active developers,existing product/services in the real world,investors,a clear roadmap,long term and short term plans,good supply?
If I am going to invest in ICO, then I check the company in many ways: team, white paper, social networks, the implementation of the road map. The more closely you check the company, the more likely that you will increase your capital by investing money.
For checking a good Ico, i always check develope team firstly. It is better than if they public their names on website, and no one in team has involve in a bad review. Secondly, i will check its whitepaper and roadmap to know what its idea is and whether the ico has gained as its roadmap. Finally, i check its community, a goodcommunity will make this ico more positive
For the cryptocurencies 2017 was for shure a year of break trough. We were able to see many new ICO's. Some with good projects and the others with worse. From my opinion @VIBERATE was one of the bright ones. They launched a rewarding system which is a complete diference to mining.
I tried it and I was able to earn 3000VIB tokens by promoting them on social media. And for shure I Will continue doing it in 2018. You can learn more on links bellow.
https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2017/12/21/viberate-music-cryptocurrency/
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/vibrant-community-viberates-key-ico-and-product-success/
http://www.metalsucks.net/2017/12/11/viberate-rolls-out-a-rewarding-system-allowing-music-fans-to-earn-crypto/
https://change-underground.com/viberate-free-crypto/
I tried it and I was able to earn 3000VIB tokens by promoting them on social media. And for shure I Will continue doing it in 2018. You can learn more on links bellow.
https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2017/12/21/viberate-music-cryptocurrency/
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/vibrant-community-viberates-key-ico-and-product-success/
http://www.metalsucks.net/2017/12/11/viberate-rolls-out-a-rewarding-system-allowing-music-fans-to-earn-crypto/
https://change-underground.com/viberate-free-crypto/
there are so many things to be considered before making a good investment. Like project problem solving, product status, product market, team check etc, but I always invest which I can afford to lose.
If i invest, money is mine. Therefore decision should be mine. I read whitepaper and all other details. Analyse its strength. Compare it with successful icos and take my decision. I would also like to see other suggestions. But final decision should be mine.
I always check their website and team as well. How about you guys? Do you go by suggestion or do you do research on the ICO?
I think all of investors of ICOs always check the website, so do i personality i do my research on the ICOs projects before making investment in them, i think that ICOs is good if they are have new innovations in digital coins and there are no many competitors about the projects of ICOs. The other aspects i choose investment in the ICOs is how much the community of them, i could checked about it on their announcement thread and their social media and activity developers of team for the ICOs projects. 
entrance for involvesment within the immediate terms of absence with the field,investors might collects of 100 percent or more with the rise of difference of the coins value
100 VIC now worth of $56
and might grows to $100 or more within the ICO terms as now running live for the public audiencies.
please visit https://www.vitrocoin.com/register?ref=j7DQto for details with investment projects.
100 VIC now worth of $56
and might grows to $100 or more within the ICO terms as now running live for the public audiencies.
please visit https://www.vitrocoin.com/register?ref=j7DQto for details with investment projects.
My opinion good ICO is that project should has working product or minimum MVP(Minimum Viable Product) , this is prove that project serious to development their idea and planing. And other thing is the project should consist of professional and solid team, and the aim of the project is interesting and different with others.
I always check their website and team as well. How about you guys? Do you go by suggestion or do you do research on the ICO?
Why? Just because many people get a couple of times in return for investing in ICO projects, I think the ICO is profitable, but I always think that ICO is a huge bubble.
Although there are many scam ICO right now. There are still some ICO's that have good idea and are legits. One way to make sure that you have found the right ICO, is to make sure that the team behind the project is a trusted one.
I always check their website and team as well. How about you guys? Do you go by suggestion or do you do research on the ICO?
In addition with that, the manager handling ICO must be in high rank and they have already run with another project. For a lot of ICO exist today's, there is no 100% guarantee legit even it is run by reputable CM because it depends also the owner of that certain project.
Sup.
What sites do you use to check ICOs? Like https://www.cybertrust.io/ , https://icorating.com/ and so on.
What sites do you use to check ICOs? Like https://www.cybertrust.io/ , https://icorating.com/ and so on.
I always check their website and team as well. How about you guys? Do you go by suggestion or do you do research on the ICO?
I always do my own research about the ICO and check everything. The team, Token distribution, how active the team is on their communication channels, if the project already has a product/alpha, the duration of the token sale and a lot of other things.
For me first thing i do to know if the ICO if it is good,a good starting point is in the ANN thread it is a strong recommended that i read the messages carefully.Investors concern will be answered in this thread and you can sense it if it is some kind of ponzi scheme if the developers avoid answering certain question or aren't collaborating.
Low market cap, good team, good project, everything must be very clear before ico. If a project has all of these, I might think of investing in it.
Yes, absolutely agree if they are not clear what they are trying to do, it does not make me have good thoughts about the projects.
because for investors ICO offers the purchase of coins at low prices and also get bonuses according to the stages of the offer. but for participants ICO bounty offers a good reward during the ICO period lasts until completion.
In ICO people sells coins take our own price but either who invest coin they earn more profit than sells
Jump to: