Topic: What makes you think that ICO is good? - page 3. (Read 465 times)
I think that ICO is good because they are raising money, they have a great team and they can easily get participants.
There are many ways to understand if an ICO is good or bad. Persoanlly i check these things ; who is behind the project and does he have a good background and cv , then i check the project if it is good and doable project.
this is my criteria for a good ico :
- Have a advisor with good track record
- Have a lot of capital to pay campaign participants
- Ads are everywhere
- Has a detailed white paper
- Roadmap makes sense
- Have a advisor with good track record
- Have a lot of capital to pay campaign participants
- Ads are everywhere
- Has a detailed white paper
- Roadmap makes sense
In conditions when such a flow of projects, I at least check the availability of a working product. This at least shows that the team is working. This of course does not confirm that the ICO will be successful, but the probability rises. If there is no work product, then this should be a really breakthrough concept and a powerful team that can implement it and to which there is trust.
I always check their website and team as well. How about you guys? Do you go by suggestion or do you do research on the ICO?
I think a project is alright to invest in when there is a more than a roadmap released for the coin.
I always do my research and follow my heart's desire. By this I mean no matter what others are saying, if the project is good enough and the team is strong, I just go ahead and invest in the ICO program. CyberTrust is one of my upcoming favorite ICOs. https://www.cybertrust.io
I always check their website and team as well. How about you guys? Do you go by suggestion or do you do research on the ICO?
How can you make sure that the ico good or not just from checking the website? Wasting time.
Team developer and marketing team are important. Working product also important.
I always check their website and team as well. How about you guys? Do you go by suggestion or do you do research on the ICO?
Same as you, im always checking their website to see what kind of ico they offering, and checking who is the sponsor of the ico, who the founder, and what kind of product or service that the ico sell. Even sometimes i got a suggestion from my brother or friends im still double check it to make sure my self that i join the right bounty. And there is another way to check the ico good or not, you could see from the first sale of the ico. Some icos gives a bar of how many tokens that they have sell that time. 
Choosing a good ico is just checking their team , mission of the company website , white paper and their road map. Partners of the company and the investors of it.
Two main criteria for me is the team and the idea. It is also important what part of the project is already ready and how well the technological aspects are described.
IMO I will look at the product, their roadmap, how active they are on social media
The team behind it is not guaranteed how they will be
I will not include lending platform ICO on my list, cause I think sooner or later it will become SCAM
The team behind it is not guaranteed how they will be
I will not include lending platform ICO on my list, cause I think sooner or later it will become SCAM
First of all, the team has good experience in the past, the presence of at least the initial stage of product, a detailed witepaper and a clear roadmap
These days its hard to tell with so many ICO's...
only if i like the idea i start to dig more and watch the team and the community around it
i did invest in an ICO for a long time, didnt find interesting ones
its better to invest when the coin is on the market and you see whats going on
only if i like the idea i start to dig more and watch the team and the community around it
i did invest in an ICO for a long time, didnt find interesting ones
its better to invest when the coin is on the market and you see whats going on
I always check their website and team as well. How about you guys? Do you go by suggestion or do you do research on the ICO?
same as you, i check their team and partners they have
if they have a partners from a big company i think they will have a good result in the end
One of the best indicators is popularity. At least it reduces the chance of it being useless. After that I dig a little deeper in to whitepaper and try understand what the project is about. Overall I don't take part in many ICOs as I feel more often than not they're cheaper after ICO than before.
I always check their website and team as well. How about you guys? Do you go by suggestion or do you do research on the ICO?
I like to see old members involvedWhen it is pumped by the old members of crypto I know they do not play around, they know what is good and what is not and they truly want crypto to succeed.
I see everyone commenting on this thread has a 2017 registration date - which means you were not around to see the hard work put in by old developer teams and you just happened to get in at the right time cause pretty much everything pumped this year - split wide open-
Definitely put some time into learning who the team is, how long have they been involved in crypto's and what is the ICO for, how active are they in informing their community about what is going on with developments.
Personally I like to see more than just a block chain and marketing in place, I like to see real results, I just read through the NXT IGNIS ICO and the way that team followed through with what they are doing and I think i would have been first in line to join if I would have been active in the forums to see the ANN, but that is cause I know what that team is capable of - its not a gamble - I know that they can produce results and continue to back up what they have built in the past.
Listen to people that have been involved in crypto for years - that is what I do.
I judge the quality of ICO from its appeal, if they have a crowd I am sure ICO is most likely to succeed.
And the important thing is the project's vision and mission is good for the long term or it will only die in the short term
And the important thing is the project's vision and mission is good for the long term or it will only die in the short term
1. check their website how well it is done, if they put an effort in it : Design as well as information how easy it can leave first impression on the first sight
2. Check who is behind the project
3. check their white paper if it makes sense to me
4. Think about the idea of project
5. Check what they have done to promote them selfs
6. Check who is behind the project
7. Check if they have started with development
8. Read whitepaper
9. Is it a scam?
Sometimes some people have money for ads and reputable staff but they fail to provide good product and serviece.
Mainly if I don't like the website and idea I don't want to waste my time to read that much, first reading of white paper is just to skim through but at end I sit down and read it in detail.
The most important thing is the value of the token after the ico. It's desirable that the number of tokens remains unchanged or even decreased later. Well if the holders of the tokens are promised a portion of the profits and discounts on the services of the project or at least tokens can be used as an internal currency for payments. Even better if the company intends to redeem tokens with a premium to the placement price within the agreed timeframe. It's bad if the company continues to unrestrictedly issue tokens % so your investments will quickly depreciate.
I always check their website and team as well. How about you guys? Do you go by suggestion or do you do research on the ICO?
Checking team is most important for me. Than whitepaper and website for detailed informations about ICO and roadmap. After that I read some comments on ANN to see what other people think about that ICO.
Jump to: