Their opinion is you're not trustworthy dude let the users figure out if you are trustworthy or not man.
You don't agree with their opinion so you want to pressure them with a completely irrelevant poll and retaliatory feedback to remove it. Your suggestion is totally against the libertarian principles on which the forum was founded (Satohsi is rolling in his grave)...
For people reading this right now, this is about:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.46153606
---------------
Are you really missing the point I am trying to make in both threads?
DT feedback is a tool that can be missused, feedback that is not DT is not, since it does not have nearly the same impact and is completely decentralized.
If it wasn't DT trust, it would be as you said 'people deciding on their own', but we all know what DT feedback carries a lot more weight, and that power is being missused
As I have said previously, I do not care what Lauda thinks or what his feedback is, nor am I trying to pressure him to change it (what?), I am merely stating the flaws of the trust system, since DT members have labeled me as 'not to be trusted' but obviously according to this poll, users of bitcointalk.org do trust me?
Thanks for your vote too! Although it's against me
Doesn't that mean that the trust system is being missused?
If a 'not to be trusted' person is trusted? And a DT member steals 3000 BCH and extorts people?
You insults to joe, which include stupid, retarded etc. are really on a kindergarden level, and you seem to be continuing the same actions in this thread too.
If you incapable of leading a civilized discussion please feel free to ignore my posts.