One day I provided a loan (
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/offering-loans-772348) and took the account as collateral, the person defaulted
I held the acc for a couple of years, just decided to get rid of it if I find a legitimate buyer, I wouldn't sell it to just anyone.
Did this
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.39675193So, seems like my account is ruined.
If you count up all the risked trades in my positive feedback there's ~50
BTC left on my profile
Aside from that, I've been running Gringotts depository with 1300-1500 XMR since 15th August 2017
XMR ATH was 494$, which means I escrowed 800k$ just there, I was escrowing some 20 000 DNR etc. (at the time I think around 10k or so) and some other things
I'm still escrowing 1350 XMR, at these prices ~150k
So, I'm asking you, what's more important to judge my trustworthiness?
Am I 'not to be trusted' because I tried to sell an account once or that I held a million USD in escrow and didn't scam anyone?
EDIT:
I know this is more off-topic, but since it's about the trust system itself and negative feedback, I assume it should be here to represent what the trust system has turned into, it's not about 'trust' anymore, it's about personal whims and thinking whether or not you yourself approve or disapprove something
Is trust really here to let us know if we should 'trust' someone with our
BTC?
Or what is it for?
What is its purpose if trust isn't?
Example
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1053331