I don't have a problem with forum members wearing signatures of gambling sites who are not gamblers themselves, but it is best if they have at least some experiences with gambling. That would help them participate in discussions and contribute relevant posts every now and then.
This should be taken into concern and must have an impact on the gambling signatures we are currently wearing. I was neither a gambler, but I educated myself on various terms in gambling and even gambled with a very tiny amount to indulge myself in discussions. The majority of the people who are wearing/probably posting
only in the gambling section of the forum can be separated by 2 types. One is an absolute shitposter who doesn't even know how the forum works and has reached a Sr-Hero member level before the merit implementation and is significantly wearing a gambling signature and posting shit to earn more btc here. Another is the real gamblers, who are regardless of weather they have a signature or not would be contributing to the Gambling Discussions.
The Gambling Discussion is similar to Altcoin Discussion which is inhabited with spammers and low level shitposters who had never gambled in their life nor do know any of these terms and would be posting here. This is why the newer gambling campaigns provides a warning such that, if the poster has never posted in gambling should never apply for the same. I would quite agree with these terms and they should never be allowed to wear a gambling signature. Posting in gambling sections alone would never be helpful for these companies considering the amount of spam prevailing here.
Most of the Bitcoin-paying campaigns are focused on gambling that is why a lot of bounty hunters in these campaigns are compelled to join gambling discussions without much to contribute, many ended up as mere spammers. I even read a post of a Sr. Member aggressively making an argument but is completely unaware that
provably and
probably are two different cats. The warning that you mentioned is of little use because any member could spend a month or two spamming in this section and afterwards he's ready to apply and get admitted in one of the gambling campaigns.
Take this one from a hero member commenting on my post in this thread itself:
^ Lol, great that was a very demanding reply and almost you killed the revenue of gambling site in that way.
It will never happen to make a zero withdrawal fee. So it means they will cover the mining fee when on the blockchain?
Probably you will say that the minimum withdrawal amount should be in zero, not just by the withdrawal fee because I think no one gambling site implement that.
Funny, in whichever way you look at it, isn't it?