Also a nice website-tokenview.com
It's a mulit-crypto block explorer integrating btc,eth,ltc and many other altcoins.
Besides the basic block info, you can also check the mining,transaction and marketcap charts here.
Topic: Whattomine - profitability website with basic json. - page 7. (Read 94973 times)
What's with Galactrum (ORE)? =)
Coin switched to PoS, thanks for the ping, updated
What's with Galactrum (ORE)? =)
Updated asic view to adapt values for equivalent cost of one S17 (approx)
Added five new/old algos to asic: BCD, Lyra2z, PHI1612, Keccak, Groestl
Some units are different between asic and solo forms, but there is a plan to unify them finally in the coming weeks.
Added five new/old algos to asic: BCD, Lyra2z, PHI1612, Keccak, Groestl
Some units are different between asic and solo forms, but there is a plan to unify them finally in the coming weeks.
HUSH difficulty seems to be too low. They started new chain, block height is around 3000 now.
Thanks for the ping, switched to follow new chain.
HUSH difficulty seems to be too low. They started new chain, block height is around 3000 now.
I see also NiceHash listed as separate coins, but with sone different data. How is revenue calculated for NiceHash coins???
Not sure what you mean by some different data. Revenue is calculated from your input hashrate and nicehash api 24h payouts (by default)
@tbates76
Not adding more exchanges at the moment.
Will take note on graviex.
I see also NiceHash listed as separate coins, but with sone different data. How is revenue calculated for NiceHash coins???
Any exchange to take the place of cryptopedia? Might i suggest https://graviex.net
@Beave162
Listed CryptoNightR with monero and lethean in the GPU section.
XHV haven and TUBE saber will now calculate with heavy values.
Listed CryptoNightR with monero and lethean in the GPU section.
XHV haven and TUBE saber will now calculate with heavy values.
A New Multicrypto Block Chain Explorer
Support all popular chain and many pow altcoins.
Don't need to switch between several websites anymore!
Here is the link:
tokenview.com
Support all popular chain and many pow altcoins.
Don't need to switch between several websites anymore!
Here is the link:
tokenview.com
Added CuckooCycle for aeternity to GPU list with nvidia values.
Binance is not accepting the main token deposits yet, but gate.io is and the market for it was also added.
ETH reward dropped, difficulty looks stable already.
Binance is not accepting the main token deposits yet, but gate.io is and the market for it was also added.
ETH reward dropped, difficulty looks stable already.
Still the best mining profitability site out there! Thank you, fredeq!
Added CuckooCycle for aeternity to GPU list with nvidia values.
Binance is not accepting the main token deposits yet, but gate.io is and the market for it was also added.
ETH reward dropped, difficulty looks stable already.
Binance is not accepting the main token deposits yet, but gate.io is and the market for it was also added.
ETH reward dropped, difficulty looks stable already.
Which formula?) Looks like it's just (86400 * 60 * hashrate / diff)
E.g. for 100 H/s WTM shows ~3.56 coins/day, which exactly matches the above.
For nethash = 2.1 MH/s reward will be 74872 coins/day, not far from current total daily rewards of (86400 / blocktime * 60) = 76235
But it's not correct, should be 76235 * 0.87 = 66324
Or maybe I'm wrong
E.g. for 100 H/s WTM shows ~3.56 coins/day, which exactly matches the above.
For nethash = 2.1 MH/s reward will be 74872 coins/day, not far from current total daily rewards of (86400 / blocktime * 60) = 76235
But it's not correct, should be 76235 * 0.87 = 66324
Or maybe I'm wrong
Think the main confusion here is coming from your equation of `76235 * 0.87 = 66324`
The block_time given on wtm is estimate of *only* cr29 blocks, so your equation should either be `(86400 / 60) * 60 * 0.87` or `(86400 / cr29_block_time) * 60`
In other words, 0.87 is already covered within block_time.
Which formula?) Looks like it's just (86400 * 60 * hashrate / diff)
E.g. for 100 H/s WTM shows ~3.56 coins/day, which exactly matches the above.
For nethash = 2.1 MH/s reward will be 74872 coins/day, not far from current total daily rewards of (86400 / blocktime * 60) = 76235
But it's not correct, should be 76235 * 0.87 = 66324
Or maybe I'm wrong
E.g. for 100 H/s WTM shows ~3.56 coins/day, which exactly matches the above.
For nethash = 2.1 MH/s reward will be 74872 coins/day, not far from current total daily rewards of (86400 / blocktime * 60) = 76235
But it's not correct, should be 76235 * 0.87 = 66324
Or maybe I'm wrong
So WTM rewards for 29 algo already take current 87% into account?
Sure, we always want to estimate the return you would get from mining on a pool.
Formula was tested over few days of mining.
So WTM rewards for 29 algo already take current 87% into account?
https://github.com/mimblewimble/grin/blob/2e22e2c6ecc5cb54665ff83c34bdd5311f29a083/core/src/consensus.rs#L65
The balance between 29 and 31 algos are changing every 11648 blocks, currently 29 rewards are not 60 coins * N blocks a day, but only 87% of that.
The balance between 29 and 31 algos are changing every 11648 blocks, currently 29 rewards are not 60 coins * N blocks a day, but only 87% of that.
I am aware of the variable distribution logic.
But what that has to do with us listing ct31?
https://github.com/mimblewimble/grin/blob/2e22e2c6ecc5cb54665ff83c34bdd5311f29a083/core/src/consensus.rs#L65
The balance between 29 and 31 algos are changing every 11648 blocks, currently 29 rewards are not 60 coins * N blocks a day, but only 87% of that.
The balance between 29 and 31 algos are changing every 11648 blocks, currently 29 rewards are not 60 coins * N blocks a day, but only 87% of that.
Jump to: