Topic: Which casino would you trust more: one that requires KYC or one that doesn't? - page 4. (Read 843 times)

Sorry, the information I got might be outdated. I haven't really visited the official site of the casino since I'm not one of the players. Thank you for the correction. So, they just recently acquired a license since the information I got was last updated in 2023?


So this is where the problem gets worse if you file a case against them. If you are from the Philippines, you need to go to Costa Rica to file a case? That's too expensive as traveling alone would already cost you a lot of money.

Thing is, KYC is always so much better than having none. And if you're here to argue that KYC doesn't do shit, (to which I'd say it's a case by case basis, and is heavily dependent upon the way the casino you're playing with operates, but I digress) I could say that having security measures, no matter how "futile" you think it is, is way better than having none at all. In this case particularly, KYC is way better than having none, especially when the whole industry almost automatically assumes that no-KYC casinos (like me) are a bunch of scams.

I have seen different post about KYC casino and non KYC casino but, I don’t think some casino will function freely without knowing their customers later as time goes on, sometimes they’ll not want to require at first and secondly I came across a post here when casino later demand customer personal information after winning a huge money. From my opinion I don’t care as long as my personal information is hidden because most people do complain about casino revealing their personal details but, personally I have not experienced such and from my experience using both is not a problem you just have to focus on the service they render if you’re comfortable with the service. Talking about trust, gamblers in general should be careful because most of the KYC casinos are not trusted.

The casino that until now, even though they have been operating for a long time, has never asked its members for KYC is freebitcoin, although some time ago, if I'm not mistaken, they would have implemented KYC but it didn't apply to their old members. I also play at one of the casinos that often has sports contests here and so far I have never had to deal with KYC either because the deposit amount is small or because this casino is KYC free. Meanwhile, the casino whose signature code I use has never asked for KYC, but that may be because the funds received so far have only been from sig camp.
I don't believe it when there are casinos or bookmakers who say they are KYC free but they are licensed, because in the future it will be an obligation for their members to carry out KYC because of the rules of the license, especially when there are large funds being deposited or withdrawn, but whether it is KYC free or not is not a benchmark for whether the casino can trustworthy because in my opinion it all depends on how they handle complaints from their members.

There are no casinos that have a 100% guarantee of providing security and comfort in the gambling that we do, whether they have enforced KYC because of regulations or not, this is very difficult but we can approach which one is safer in both of them is of course the one that has obtained regulations and the casino runs it properly, I also don't have a problem maybe today I gamble at a casino that doesn't have regulations but some time later I have to do KYC because of regulatory updates, I don't think it's a big problem if the casino we are in has a good reputation and a logical TOS.

Reputation would really be always the main thing that should really be checked out on which people wont really be caring about KYC or other requirement as long they are dealing on something that could be trusted then it wont really be that much of an issue but i do agree on some points earlier that we do have still platforms now that doesnt ask out about KYC but you could really be freely be able to play without minding those things as long you wont really be able to commit out such violation. So on the question if people would really be trusting into those who do require KYC but known ones and having license? Of course people would really be doing that because we do know that when it comes to gambling then it would really be that something in connection about huge money or bankroll that some other players would really be depositing into.

If you dont really care that much about being anonymous and really that liking on trying to play on a site which you are really that interested then this one wont be an issue.
Actually people wont really care as long they are dealing with a legit site and having no pending or unresolved issues in compared into those platforms who dont ask KYC
but having that tons of issues and problems.

To answer your question, I would say that I would trust a casino with KYC more than a casino without it. I think that casinos with verification requirements at least take their products and their work more seriously. This is very relevant nowadays, as there are so many online casinos. If you have nothing to hide and you don’t want anyone to find out that you play in an online casino, then you should probably prefer a casino with a verification requirement. It is also worth noting that your identity should not be disclosed in any case due to confidentiality conditions

The most important aspects are reputation and what we are actually looking for. There are casinos that have fewer games while some also could have more games but still need in the gambling space with less reputation. Reputable is very important in how legit a gambling platform could be. As a gambler, one motive is to make money but when such motive has been accomplished then the mission is yet pending. KYC casinos are not always my favorites just like other gamblers too because people prefer betting on a platform where they could be anonymous without any problem or issue about their privacy which is very important for all.

If the two gambling sites are legit and they have all the necessary things that I do look for before making use of a casino, then I would rather go to a casino without the KYC requirement. I love my privacy, if not that sometimes I don’t just have a choice, I will never reveal my identity. I won’t submit my personal information to anyone. So if I have the opportunity not to submit my identity, then I will go for it.
 
We should know that sometimes our identities are sold out to scammers, who will end up using them for illegal activities. Some of the gambling site staff might be doing this just to earn more money, so we should try our possible best not to reveal our identity anyhow.

I think those casinos that request for KYC are those that are being regulated and have obtained their license of operation from the government. If a casino is regulated, they will likely have a good reputation and may not want to let their customers have doubts about them, but non-KYC casinos may not be regulated, and they can easily scam customers without any sanctions. I have read the comments of some people here, and I agree with what some users have already said: that casinos should be chosen based on their reputation. Some KYC casinos and some non-KYC casinos are very reputable, and what matters is if the gambler is getting the perfect satisfaction they want. 

It is a good idea to check the complete rules about KYC so that we know the chosen gambling is in accordance with what we want or not.

First, I will look at how the casino site works and how the feedback from other customers is,
because it will determine whether the Online Casino is safe or not in withdrawals and some of the games contained in it.

If it does apply KYC, I will do it, but with the note that the implementation of KYC is only done on some large withdrawal transactions or on some games,
but not at the beginning of registration.

But if the casino is popular enough and recommended without KYC, it is a good enough casino to be anonymous, because it will be easy to register and withdraw without strict rules.

Some Casinos that implement KYC such as:
Stake: Implementing KYC on large withdrawals
BC. Games: Requires KYC for some Features
Betway: Casino and Sports Betting site with full KYC implementation.
888casino: Applies KYC to registration but has a good reputation.

Non-KYC Casinos
Cloudbet: No KYC that supports crypto
Bitsler: Variety of games without KYC
FortuneJack: Huge selection of games and bonuses without KYC
Primedice: Offers a dice game without KYC.

What about Roobet and Rollbit?

Roobet does not ask for KYC directly for deposits and withdrawals,
but they will ask for it at any time when a large withdrawal is made or if there is any suspicious activity.

While Rollbit may be stricter because it will ask for KYC even if it makes a small withdrawal for some reason,
and KYC is also required to access some features on games and betting.

Note: Correct me if there is some misinformation

::/OP/:::I think you don't understand the issue very well, since nothing, absolutely nothing, Zero, has to do with KYC with trust in a casino or the opposite, not having it.

On the other hand, the newcomers crypto Casinos opened a door to no KYC, which did not last long, but has always been the norm with any type of casino.

Eitherway would be fine for me. The gambling provider I am playing at is currently requiring KYC procedures on withdrawals and I have no problem with it. One reason I guess why I don't worry that much is that, so far I never had any privacy problems so maybe you just have to pick the right platform you could be free of worries. But I do understand other players who are concerned of this procedure and those who prefer platforms without this requirement. Their worries are simply valid especially if you happened to run into a fraudalent platform. Good thing that this industry offers both having and lacking the requirement because it gives options and alternative to players.
Many people are still just worried of their identity to be used on illegal activities and we cannot blame them about it. Let them be 'coz there are platforms they could be enjoying more with their demands being  met. There are many providers to choose from and that is enough for you to pick one that could match your ideals.

Its a big mistake for a gambler to trust a platform all because they are not requesting for kyc, base on my understanding, we even have to be cautioned on any platform that doesn't require for kyc because they cannot be trusted to that extent, we have to make sure we research about them and know how they have been consistent in their service and reliable, any of the two should not be our excuse if we are not much convinced about them.

As long as the site is good, I will gamble with them and there are top sites that didn't require KYC that much, so I'm ok with this.
Don't ever gamble on a site you are doubting because you will spend money there and the risk of losing is high because of the probability that the site will turn into a scam site. If you want a peace of mind, just choose the best site and even if there is KYC it's worth to gamble.

It's not all casino that request for KYC are actually licensed to operate in some regions, sometimes they are just doing a preventive measures to see people who abuse privileges such as the bonuses events and also know people who cheat their ways in their Casino. They used KYC to prevent future law enforcement and been sue just incase they are been accused of one, they can counter it by saying their platform doesn't do any of thag and will walk away peacefully.

It doesn't matter about KYC, we have seen casino that scam people despite been asking for KYC, some of them refused to pay some users because of some reason best known to them even when the users are been KYC from beginning and some casino that doesn't have KYC has also banned some people from playing. All I can say is that when choosing a casino, make sure that it has history of good reputation so you don't have to worry about all these KYC or not.

I mean as much as I would of course prefer to use a casino that doesn't require KYC, I think it's probably for the best going with casinos that do.  I suppose a big part of it is also how they are registered, what country it's in and of course of the most important things of, taking a good hard look at their history and their reputation. I know there's been a few casinos here that have been advertising but yet had been known to scam users.  Yet some people still used them.  Blow my mind.

For Trust and Security, casinos that mandate KYC are indeed more reliable: they adhere to stringent standards set by regulators who seek to curtail money laundering and nefarious activities. The verification of KYC guarantees the identity of the player, hence more safety for the user. While some people find the KYC verification quite complicated


Non-KYC casinos provide Ease of Access, allowing players to register and start playing more quickly without the need for a lengthy verification process. But along with this convenience comes higher security risks; non-KYC casinos lack the stringent regulations that KYC casinos have in place. As a result, players could be exposed to potential fraud or loss of funds, without proper oversight, these platforms may easily tilt towards unfair practices or even outright fraud.

Casino KYC would be more appropriate if security and trust are of priority. But then again, non-KYC casinos might come up on your radar if you put a premium on privacy and the ease of use, although be forewarned of the risks that could ensue.

I can trust casino both casino with KYC and without KYC, for me KYC is not a thing to consider which casino I have to trust.
As long as the casino serve me well as player, I dont really care about KYC will be asked or not, KYC is mandatory or not.
In fact, there are many casinos turn to scam from both category, so my conclusion is that KYC or not does not affect reputation of casino because reputation is given by us as players based on our own experience.

If am to choose a casino based on trust, I will not trust a casino because they request for KYC neither will I still choose to trust a casino because they don't request for KYC. I will choose a casino because of the reputation they have earned for themselves, I will choose a casino that have been operating for a long year with dignity. Some casino can request for KYC but are scam, that's also how some non KYC casinos can be scam too. Choose wisely.