Topic: Who is to be blamed, the gambler or the betting agent - page 5. (Read 1795 times)

If it is wrong for the owner to give the loan then the borrower is more guilty. Since the owner operates a casino or gambling business, he can certainly provide loans to grow his business. On the other hand, the person taking the loan should also be aware of whether he can repay the loan amount or not. When providing loans, sometimes such situations have to be accepted. It would have been better if the financial condition of the borrower could have been well known before giving the loan, then it would have been possible to prevent such a situation.

Agreed, quitting is not an easy thing. Whether it is gambling or something else. The owner shouldn't have given money, just because he gave money the victim continued spending. If not, he could've left with what he had lost from his pocket. The trouble maker is the casino owner who knows well about the reality of gambling that it is not easy to recover the losses.

If you don't reduce the risk, you will only see the risk of losing money getting bigger, and if that happens, you should immediately stop gambling and rest. It's not good to continue gambling because we can lose even more, especially if we deposit more money into the gambling account. It will only make us want to recover our losses even though we know that it will not guarantee that we can recover losses but provide other losses. Here it is better for us to prevent that loss than get other losses so we will not lose much money.

If you don't reduce the risk, you will only see the risk of losing money getting bigger, and if that happens, you should immediately stop gambling and rest. It's not good to continue gambling because we can lose even more, especially if we deposit more money into the gambling account. It will only make us want to recover our losses even though we know that it will not guarantee that we can recover losses but provide other losses. Here it is better for us to prevent that loss than get other losses so we will not lose much money.

If it is wrong for the owner to give the loan then the borrower is more guilty. Since the owner operates a casino or gambling business, he can certainly provide loans to grow his business. On the other hand, the person taking the loan should also be aware of whether he can repay the loan amount or not. When providing loans, sometimes such situations have to be accepted. It would have been better if the financial condition of the borrower could have been well known before giving the loan, then it would have been possible to prevent such a situation.

Yes because for gamblers, it is take the risk and have the chance to some profit and if you are not taking the risk then you are not preventing anything. You are only preventing something by avoiding it and that is the reason I have said it is not for a gambler to prevent it, be it the risk or something else. If you are a gambler and you have come to gamble, all you have to do is to gamble as you can bear and in order words you are gambling anyway and you are not preventing it only to reduce your risk.

If it is wrong for the owner to give the loan then the borrower is more guilty. Since the owner operates a casino or gambling business, he can certainly provide loans to grow his business. On the other hand, the person taking the loan should also be aware of whether he can repay the loan amount or not. When providing loans, sometimes such situations have to be accepted. It would have been better if the financial condition of the borrower could have been well known before giving the loan, then it would have been possible to prevent such a situation.

Agreed, quitting is not an easy thing. Whether it is gambling or something else. The owner shouldn't have given money, just because he gave money the victim continued spending. If not, he could've left with what he had lost from his pocket. The trouble maker is the casino owner who knows well about the reality of gambling that it is not easy to recover the losses.

What @Gozie51 said is true because when someone gambles, he can afford to risk losing, and actually, he already knows that his chances of winning might not be too great. But because he took that risk, he still gambled, and gamblers just want to bet so they don't see the rest. So they think what will happen next is something they can think about later after gambling. And if they don't dare to take the risk of losing, they should stop gambling and relax at home, enjoying the atmosphere. Thus, they don't have to think about the risks of gambling or other things.

This is not for gambling. For gambling, usually what you are seeing is the winning. Taking of risk is what gambling is, if you are not a risk taker then maybe gambling is not for you and maybe that is the sense that prevention can be apt but as a gambling then you are only heading for the winning. Most gamblers don't see limitation to what they want to bet until they are finished with it and the result is out to their favour or not. There are no prevention if you are a gambler, it is only those who don't gamble will run away after losing.

A situation occurred today in my locality,  I have some guys working for me today and suddenly I hard them battling with an issues and when I get close to them to know what exactly the problem is,  and I asked the guy who look strange to me since I am meeting him for the first time and not a worker on the site what his business and why he is distracting the workers from work.

Then the guy narrated his case to be and he said,  that one of the workers came to his betting shop the yesterday to play some visual,  that at first the guy came with ₦‎1,000 in my local currency to make the bets and along the line, he existed the balance but as a regular customer,  the agent decided to allow him at further on credits and in all he accumulated a total debt of ₦‎8,000 because he lost all the bets and since that yesterday he has been on the run from the gambling agent until he traced him to the site today.

So when I wanted to judge the case and possible settlement,  I query the casino agent how can you allow a customer to gamble on credit to the tune of 8k Knowing fully well that the gambler only has a 1k balance which already existed?

Also what is the probability that the gambler will ever return after owning such debt in the betting shops,  note the gambler's daily pay is 2k as a helper on the site,  so he has to work for 4 days to be able to meet that debt that is if he doesn't make any other expenses.

Question is:

What is the possibility of the betting agent getting his money soon/considering the gambler's low-income earnings?

As they say, prevention is better than cure.

A situation occurred today in my locality,  I have some guys working for me today and suddenly I hard them battling with an issues and when I get close to them to know what exactly the problem is,  and I asked the guy who look strange to me since I am meeting him for the first time and not a worker on the site what his business and why he is distracting the workers from work.

Then the guy narrated his case to be and he said,  that one of the workers came to his betting shop the yesterday to play some visual,  that at first the guy came with ₦‎1,000 in my local currency to make the bets and along the line, he existed the balance but as a regular customer,  the agent decided to allow him at further on credits and in all he accumulated a total debt of ₦‎8,000 because he lost all the bets and since that yesterday he has been on the run from the gambling agent until he traced him to the site today.

So when I wanted to judge the case and possible settlement,  I query the casino agent how can you allow a customer to gamble on credit to the tune of 8k Knowing fully well that the gambler only has a 1k balance which already existed?

Also what is the probability that the gambler will ever return after owning such debt in the betting shops,  note the gambler's daily pay is 2k as a helper on the site,  so he has to work for 4 days to be able to meet that debt that is if he doesn't make any other expenses.

Question is:

What is the possibility of the betting agent getting his money soon/considering the gambler's low-income earnings?

Not everyone who gambled with the loan is losing, but many are also benefiting a lot.  For those who are profiting, they don't have to use any of their own money, but only keep the profit in their own pocket by gambling.  But on the other hand those who gamble with loans and lose are in deep danger. Gambling is very addictive and because of it is a lot of fun everyone gets addicted to it very quickly. Because of this, one thing everyone should keep in mind is whether he can control himself from gambling

Not everyone who gambled with the loan is losing, but many are also benefiting a lot.  For those who are profiting, they don't have to use any of their own money, but only keep the profit in their own pocket by gambling.  But on the other hand those who gamble with loans and lose are in deep danger. Gambling is very addictive and because of it is a lot of fun everyone gets addicted to it very quickly. Because of this, one thing everyone should keep in mind is whether he can control himself from gambling

When we enter a casino, whether it is a traditional casino, we are going to listen to many voices, advice and some express their thoughts letting us know what they say, but we as players are the owners of our own money, we are the ones who take risks, we are the that we put our face on certain occasions, and we have at our disposal everything that we must do, we have to listen to whoever, we have to pay attention to the things that others say and it is our responsibility. things that we should always do, when it comes to money and risk it, I think we should always be the protagonists.

In these casinos there will always be agents, those who are in charge of distributing chips or anything else, this type of person can give us advice or something, it is up to us if we follow them or not, when they talk about casino agents we can imagine many things, there are many, what sion in charge of everything in the casino, we as players must have decision-making power, we cannot do other things but stick to our own decisions, it is not the fault of others if we want to follow their advice or something, because the money is ours, it doesn't belong to anyone else, if we win it, it's us who win, not the others, if we lose, it's us, not the others.

Not everyone who gambled with the loan is losing, but many are also benefiting a lot.  For those who are profiting, they don't have to use any of their own money, but only keep the profit in their own pocket by gambling.  But on the other hand those who gamble with loans and lose are in deep danger. Gambling is very addictive and because of it is a lot of fun everyone gets addicted to it very quickly. Because of this, one thing everyone should keep in mind is whether he can control himself from gambling

Even if quitting is difficult, they should still try. It would be better for them than taking a big risk that they couldn't take. Both of them have made a mistake and had a problem, which should be resolved amicably. Between the person who borrowed and the person who lent the money, they can discuss how the borrower can return the money. And the lender should be able to provide enough time for the borrower to return the money. The person who borrowed it could return the money by returning it little by little.

Agreed, quitting is not an easy thing. Whether it is gambling or something else. The owner shouldn't have given money, just because he gave money the victim continued spending. If not, he could've left with what he had lost from his pocket. The trouble maker is the casino owner who knows well about the reality of gambling that it is not easy to recover the losses.