Pages:
Author

Topic: Who will win WW3? - page 17. (Read 66640 times)

member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
March 27, 2016, 05:20:37 PM
Could see a proxy war getting out of hand but besides that no Country wants to go full out war.
China may push boundaries but they frequently will back down to pressure and are just testing the limits.
India and Pakistan have tit for tat forever and it has not boiled over.
The only real threat is homegrown Muslim extremists and that would most likely be dealt with on a global front by everyone.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
March 27, 2016, 04:17:18 PM
Nobody considers Islamic Army includes 38 states.
newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
March 27, 2016, 03:37:35 PM
No one really wins a world war..
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Gloire à la Victoire !
March 27, 2016, 09:52:00 AM
This is crucial! And if you can count on endless human resources you really have power. Plus they have nuclear weapons, in future many things will not be decided without China's approvals. Today we have 3 major world forces, rest are regional forces.

No. I disagree with you. Military technology has advanced to such an extent that manpower no longer count as an important factor during the warfare. There is no point in having a multi-million army, if 90% of it can be wiped out in a matter of few seconds using tactical nuclear weapons. And as I pointed out earlier, China no longer has an endless pool of human resource (thanks to the one-child policy).

No, the man count is much more important. That's not your teleguidated bombs that take a city, but brave men. Who drive the tanks ? Men, not robots.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
March 25, 2016, 05:49:44 AM
The next time you go out look around and check out the recruitment material. Does it look very promising? Then think who can win freakin world war three  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1135
Merit: 1001
March 25, 2016, 01:00:39 AM
You forgot about India.The future most populated country in the world(China in second place)...
The Asian union should be Russia,China,India.... Grin


India and china have some problems to solve first. They had 3 wars between them not a long time ago. There are border disputes. Some say chinese military repeatedly cross into indian territory. And india doesn't like the strong relations between china and pakistan. With more time maybe they will grow closer.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
March 24, 2016, 08:30:28 AM
You forgot about India.The future most populated country in the world(China in second place)...
The Asian union should be Russia,China,India.... Grin
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
March 24, 2016, 06:44:49 AM
LOL, even Russion and China combine, they can't campare to USA.
hero member
Activity: 2618
Merit: 548
SecureShift.io | Crypto-Exchange
March 23, 2016, 08:43:47 AM
World war 3 won't take place as people have realized the value of human life. Only people who consider battle field as business ground promote war.
hero member
Activity: 2632
Merit: 787
Jack of all trades 💯
March 23, 2016, 05:26:01 AM
Obviously theres no winner on war all are losers becoz all lose their life assets. Environment builds and economy is destroy by war and especially human life. Better to have a good disscussion than to declare a war.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
March 22, 2016, 07:09:44 AM
Hillary Clinton Email Archive

On March 16, 2016 WikiLeaks launched a searchable archive for 30,322 emails & email attachments sent to and from Hillary Clinton's private email server while she was Secretary of State. The 50,547 pages of documents span from 30 June 2010 to 12 August 2014. 7,570 of the documents were sent by Hillary Clinton. The emails were made available in the form of thousands of PDFs by the US State Department as a result of a Freedom of Information Act request. The final PDFs were made available on February 29, 2016.

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/


Wikileaks carries through well its mission against democrats. One force wants republicians win the elections

I don´t know; personally if I was in the leak business I´d focus on morons that can´t maintain elementary security. It pretty much seems to go without saying, you go for the weak or absent defenses.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
March 22, 2016, 03:59:27 AM
Hillary Clinton Email Archive

On March 16, 2016 WikiLeaks launched a searchable archive for 30,322 emails & email attachments sent to and from Hillary Clinton's private email server while she was Secretary of State. The 50,547 pages of documents span from 30 June 2010 to 12 August 2014. 7,570 of the documents were sent by Hillary Clinton. The emails were made available in the form of thousands of PDFs by the US State Department as a result of a Freedom of Information Act request. The final PDFs were made available on February 29, 2016.

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/


Wikileaks carries through well its mission against democrats. One force wants republicians win the elections
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
March 22, 2016, 02:11:29 AM
Hillary Clinton Email Archive

On March 16, 2016 WikiLeaks launched a searchable archive for 30,322 emails & email attachments sent to and from Hillary Clinton's private email server while she was Secretary of State. The 50,547 pages of documents span from 30 June 2010 to 12 August 2014. 7,570 of the documents were sent by Hillary Clinton. The emails were made available in the form of thousands of PDFs by the US State Department as a result of a Freedom of Information Act request. The final PDFs were made available on February 29, 2016.

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/

legendary
Activity: 1135
Merit: 1001
March 22, 2016, 12:38:04 AM

No. I disagree with you. Military technology has advanced to such an extent that manpower no longer count as an important factor during the warfare. There is no point in having a multi-million army, if 90% of it can be wiped out in a matter of few seconds using tactical nuclear weapons. And as I pointed out earlier, China no longer has an endless pool of human resource (thanks to the one-child policy).
They probably faking  this numbers, like everything else. Don't forget socialism will never be sincere to west, and this is fact! East and west are enemies and much of truth is fabricated on both sides

What does socialism have to do with it? Doesn't socialism exist in the west too? In some countries more others less. Though none had workers control of production or anything like it. In the east or the west.


This is crucial! And if you can count on endless human resources you really have power. Plus they have nuclear weapons, in future many things will not be decided without China's approvals. Today we have 3 major world forces, rest are regional forces.

No. I disagree with you. Military technology has advanced to such an extent that manpower no longer count as an important factor during the warfare. There is no point in having a multi-million army, if 90% of it can be wiped out in a matter of few seconds using tactical nuclear weapons. And as I pointed out earlier, China no longer has an endless pool of human resource (thanks to the one-child policy).

You are correct about this,there is really no use of having a lot of militia forces marching when they can be wiped out in just one hit.
Todays war will be decided by technology which will decrease the casualty of any country.

Don't know about decreasing casualties. Maybe strong countries don't fight each other directly. But proxy wars are many times more bloody. Sanctions destroy entire countries. And indirectly cause many deaths. Like what happened in iraq for example. And how many more people died in drone strikes than we know about? It maybe cheaper to wage war with technology. But I don't know it saves more lives.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
March 21, 2016, 11:38:53 AM
the simple is

russia + China = Nuclear war , no Mercy  + NATO = dust

so the winner is russia LOL

it just my Opinion

hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
March 21, 2016, 11:36:43 AM

No. I disagree with you. Military technology has advanced to such an extent that manpower no longer count as an important factor during the warfare. There is no point in having a multi-million army, if 90% of it can be wiped out in a matter of few seconds using tactical nuclear weapons. And as I pointed out earlier, China no longer has an endless pool of human resource (thanks to the one-child policy).
They probably faking  this numbers, like everything else. Don't forget socialism will never be sincere to west, and this is fact! East and west are enemies and much of truth is fabricated on both sides
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1011
March 21, 2016, 09:26:23 AM
there will be no winner because WW3 will never happen. The world is already aware that the war only cause damage and loss, both physically and materially. no one will want to feel what is happening in WW1 and WW2. all will live a happy, safe and peaceful. who want only people who did not appreciate his own life.  Cool
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
March 21, 2016, 04:26:07 AM
This is crucial! And if you can count on endless human resources you really have power. Plus they have nuclear weapons, in future many things will not be decided without China's approvals. Today we have 3 major world forces, rest are regional forces.

No. I disagree with you. Military technology has advanced to such an extent that manpower no longer count as an important factor during the warfare. There is no point in having a multi-million army, if 90% of it can be wiped out in a matter of few seconds using tactical nuclear weapons. And as I pointed out earlier, China no longer has an endless pool of human resource (thanks to the one-child policy).

You are correct about this,there is really no use of having a lot of militia forces marching when they can be wiped out in just one hit.
Todays war will be decided by technology which will decrease the casualty of any country.
legendary
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1217
March 20, 2016, 02:33:09 PM
This is crucial! And if you can count on endless human resources you really have power. Plus they have nuclear weapons, in future many things will not be decided without China's approvals. Today we have 3 major world forces, rest are regional forces.

No. I disagree with you. Military technology has advanced to such an extent that manpower no longer count as an important factor during the warfare. There is no point in having a multi-million army, if 90% of it can be wiped out in a matter of few seconds using tactical nuclear weapons. And as I pointed out earlier, China no longer has an endless pool of human resource (thanks to the one-child policy).
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
March 20, 2016, 01:49:39 PM
The Chinese armed forces are not that strong. They have a large pool of manpower, but that advantage is gradually waning as a result of the low birth rates. The Chinese fertility rate (1.66 children / woman) is lower than that of Russia (1.81 children per woman) and the US (1.88 children per woman). Also, their weapons and equipment are of low quality, unlike those in the possession of Russia and the US.
This is crucial! And if you can count on endless human resources you really have power. Plus they have nuclear weapons, in future many things will not be decided without China's approvals. Today we have 3 major world forces, rest are regional forces.
Pages:
Jump to: