Who will win WW3? - page 33. | Bitcointalksearch.org

bryant.coleman

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1217

Quote from: xuan87 on January 19, 2016, 06:30:26 AM

if you asked me probably i am going to choose russia, but eventhough they win the war all of their country will be damage and also half of the world will lost,when they start to use nuclear and bio weapon, human being will be suffered huge damage, so nobody is actually win anything in war

Yes. Half the world would be reduced to rubble, and this "half" is likely to include Russia, the United States, Canada, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, United Arab Emirates, European Union, Ukraine, Belarus, Iran, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, DPRK, Syria, Egypt, South Korea, Japan(?)etc.

But the other half would escape the war unscathed. This half is likely to include China, India, Indonesia, Brazil, South Africa, Argentina, Nigeria.etc. Once the war is over, these countries will dominate the world.

flumesshag

member

Activity: 102

Merit: 100

no one. ww3 wont be finished, it will just end.
Nobody could win WW3 if it were ever to happen. The world would be destroyed by our advanced wepons.

iCeSaiah

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Who? The middle man off course. The business people behind weapon manufacturers. Everyone will lost cause there are surely casualties. Even if a party win. There will always be war. Inside and out.

xuan87

legendary

Activity: 1666

Merit: 1001

if you asked me probably i am going to choose russia, but eventhough they win the war all of their country will be damage and also half of the world will lost,when they start to use nuclear and bio weapon, human being will be suffered huge damage, so nobody is actually win anything in war

mOgliE

legendary

Activity: 1344

Merit: 1251

Quote from: ridery99 on January 19, 2016, 05:58:14 AM

Quote from: madonnino on January 19, 2016, 05:46:51 AM

war never had real winners, all more or 'less and will lose something, was is hell, war is a shit

It's not the case in the coming nuclear war because the adversary will be totally annihilated leaving the winning side ruling the remaining continent.

Nope, because the one side being annihilated will still be able to annihilate the other side. That's the main point of the nuclear submarines. They can stay under water for months if not for years and launch hundreds of nuclear bombs every where on the planet, no matter the good or bad shape of the side owning the submarines!

ridery99

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

Quote from: madonnino on January 19, 2016, 05:46:51 AM

war never had real winners, all more or 'less and will lose something, was is hell, war is a shit

It's not the case in the coming nuclear war because the adversary will be totally annihilated leaving the winning side ruling the remaining continent.

madonnino

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 250

I ❤ www.LuckyB.it!

war never had real winners, all more or 'less and will lose something, was is hell, war is a shit

RealBitcoin

hero member

Activity: 854

Merit: 1009

JAYCE DESIGNS - http://bit.ly/1tmgIwK

Folks this will be a financial war, and no country's economy can support a huge army.

The winners will be those that had a small/ defensive army, while those that prepare for offense, will go bankrupt before being able to attack Cheesy

mOgliE

legendary

Activity: 1344

Merit: 1251

Hey, I wouldn't want to hurt your feelings but I'd say the only winners will be Europeans Grin

I'll take the example of France, cause a citizen it's the country I know the best.
I'd say that in case of a WW3, France would be completely neutral and wouldn't even lose one soldier.

Why so? Well easy as a pie. We got the Bomb H along with 7 nuclear submarines, a total of 480 bombs can be launched at any time anywhere on the Earth. It's enough to destroy any nation, even Russia, China or USA (though maybe not the 3 of them).
Now, why would anyone try to invade us? Why fighting us?
We got literally NOTHING you would want! Our main resources are corns and our culture. There is no interest for any nation to risk being destroyed by our nuclear power.

So I would say that France and probably a good part of Europe would stay neutral, and that no one would try to invade us. Just because we have nothing of interest, main resources are Oil and Iron, we don't have much of both ^^

For me we would be the winners, because we would be the one not fighting. Especially as they can fight by the other side of the world, it would even be shorter to go through the Pacific ocean =)

bryant.coleman

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1217

Quote from: ridery99 on January 15, 2016, 02:30:39 AM

Russia's Buildup Of S-400 Missile Batteries In Kaliningrad Is Freaking Out NATO

http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/russias-buildup-of-s-400-missile-batteries-in-kaliningr-1752792417

It was a natural response from Russia, to the newly installed NATO missile defense / air defense systems in Poland and Romania. I don't understand why the NATO guys are going ballistic over this. It was the NATO, which first placed the air-defense systems close to the Russian borders. Also, the S-400 is having a range of only 250 km, which is going to cover only small parts of Poland and Finland.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

We have been in WW3 since the very end of WW2. There won't be any winner or loser. WW3 will convert into WW4 before there is a winner or loser.

Jameshartl

newbie

Activity: 8

Merit: 0

Russia-more land people more secretive nukes and a crazy hitlerist dictator

ridery99

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

Russia's Buildup Of S-400 Missile Batteries In Kaliningrad Is Freaking Out NATO

http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/russias-buildup-of-s-400-missile-batteries-in-kaliningr-1752792417

Boelens

hero member

Activity: 672

Merit: 500

Quote from: ifightformerkel on January 14, 2016, 02:49:41 PM

Not russia, not europe and not the usa.

The only winner will be china.

China has about 10000 Kilometer giang tunnels, over the whole country.
They has there over 3000 nuclear bombs and can shift and shoot it from on side of the country to the other side.

You cant destroy tunnels so easy when thery are hundreds of meters deep.

The first directly losers will be europe and russia.

There are nuclear bombs everywhere. Nobody will win if a world war happens. Unless by some magic they make an agreement to never launch nuclear weaponry at eachother, everyone is just going to end up blasting eachother away with nuclear weapons and there won't be any country left to actually win the war, considering everything will just be destroyed. I still doubt a WW3 would happen in the nearby future though, unless diplomatic relations reaaally mess up.

ifightformerkel

legendary

Activity: 1386

Merit: 1000

Not russia, not europe and not the usa.

The only winner will be china.

China has about 10000 Kilometer giang tunnels, over the whole country.
They has there over 3000 nuclear bombs and can shift and shoot it from on side of the country to the other side.

You cant destroy tunnels so easy when thery are hundreds of meters deep.

The first directly losers will be europe and russia.

ridery99

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

ridery99

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

ridery99

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

RealBitcoin

hero member

Activity: 854

Merit: 1009

JAYCE DESIGNS - http://bit.ly/1tmgIwK

Quote from: AlphaCatalyst on January 11, 2016, 03:30:37 PM

There will never be a World War III. China cannot survive without the income from NATO countries, and NATO countries cannot service without cheap Chinese goods.

Damnit you dont get it, if they start world war, nobody will survive, literally. Because the earth will be a glowing fireball from all the radiation from the nukes.

Economy doesnt matter when the earth turns into a flameball.

AlphaCatalyst

member

Activity: 74

Merit: 10

The origin of "brave" evolved from "savage".

There will never be a World War III. China cannot survive without the income from NATO countries, and NATO countries cannot service without cheap Chinese goods.

Topic: Who will win WW3? - page 33. (Read 66663 times)