Topic: Why are all women leaders so fucking terrible... - page 3. (Read 2213 times)

Do not think this is the issue, think its more how we perceive women roles of power. Every leader needs strong support and some men will resent women in higher positions no matter what.
So religious expectations for women, societies gender roles or something deeper? Be a challenge to peg the issue down.

because women have no guts for leadership.

Actually that may be more in line with how you are perceiving the discussion. If you want to close conversations in that manner you could really apply it to any topic and be done with it. Its pretty much what the political correct movement is all about,shutting down honest discussion about relevant issues.

So when some one is robbed what is the first thing that people use to describe the person? You realize we are actually programmed to be racist,its a uncomfortable feeling of the unknown and its subtle enough that most people would consider themselves to be not racist or prejudice.

If we can not address sexuality or race as a issue what are you really trying to tell us? Has nothing to do with being excepting of one another or tolerant of differences.

There are differences between Male leader and female leader, their perspective and their point of view is different, but when comes to decide something I think both of them is the same, but in my opinion Male leader is better in cooperation and communication

Very good response this really makes me think and I often catch myself in biases relating to sexual orientation.
It kind of what I am trying to figure out with Hilary Clinton,is it the suits that bother me or the actual issues of her being a warhawk that is in the pocket.
They all end up in the pocket some how through greed or exploitation,so not sure why it bothers me so much. She feels insincere and I can not get past that.

There must be something to women also knowing they are viewed in this way and it feeding into how they present themselves to the public.
Sometimes they over act or over react to get the message across and that has to be something they have studied with their handlers.

yes maybe you correct on that,i see country with women president or leader,will not same good as country or are that lead by men,some asian country has proof it,phlipine when its lead by women,its not good,indonesia also ever lead by women,its not good too.

So, you can continue with your statement and ask why black people are bad leaders, or leaders in Asia etc.
I think that you are wrong.
There are not good or bad man or woman leaders.
There are not good or bad black man leaders etc.
Sex, race, religion or nationality doesn't influence on leadership abilities but moral values and personal character.
Mrs. Thacher was one of the greatest politic leader in United Kingdom, in this century
It's the same for Indira Gandhi in India or Golda Meir in Israel etc.
So, don't judge people based on their sex, race or nationality but based on their character.

Benazir Bhutto

I think you came close to the center of this argument, but are attributing it to society itself some how not having evolved yet to accept female leaders. The reason it does not "sit right" and feels "risky" is because it is. Women have themselves not been able to occupy positions of leadership for more than what 100 years or so? Biologically speaking, men have evolved to lead, and women have evolved to use the protection of men to survive. This is not just on a physical level but a physiological level as well. Men have had thousands of years of experience evolving these skills, and these traits have been selected for via evolution. Women have not been in positions of leadership long enough to even begin to start catching up with this evolution in males.

Now I am not arguing that men are automatically better leaders, but it seems that they are ABLE to be better leaders in general, and have given into the trappings of corruption like any human being in a position of leadership has lately. This is the dirty little secret feminists would like to keep under wraps at all costs, and why they will lose their minds over any biological or evolutionary comparison between men and women. They understand that women on an INDIVIDUAL level require a state of symbiosis or at least parasitism on men in order to survive, and the discussion of this fact destroys their whole feminist narrative of women being exactly equal to men. Women should be TREATED equally, actual equality between any two humans is nothing more than a myth. If it were true there would be no individuals and we would all be the same, and clearly this is not the case. This is why collectivists are waging a constant battle against those who are "privileged" enough to have more intelligence, skills, wealth, etc than others so they can force them to regress to the mean, thereby elevating their own positions in comparison. This is also why women in general tend to lean toward collectivism, because they require the state to take from the individualists who have done better in order to increase their own standard of living via theft from those individuals.

We've had feminists in particular preaching the lie for decades that "If women were in power there would be no wars" so naturally peoples' expectations were high, if you tell a lie often enough people start to believe it.

LOL, very true.

because in islam women are never in leader ship that is why.

What about male leaders? Are they any better? I don't think so. All the politicians are pretty much the same. We shouldn't expect anything special from the female ones.

how about defending the country's borders and putting your own people first instead of islamic invaders

You are terrible wrong? Are you all women hatters or what? I think Angela Merkel is great leader. And I wonder how good would you bee in. such situation if you had a chance?

They are emotional and not logical fact thinking people

Female leadership gets criticise & judged harshly, by both men and women alike.
It comes from a feeling within individuals that female leadership does not 'sit right'. Female leadership feels 'wrong' at a primal, 'gut' level.
Female leadership feels 'risky'.
Humans don't have an evolutionary experience with women leading groups.

The argument can easily be be re-framed, given the vast number of male leaders we have had throughout history how many would you consider good?

All women leaders make so fucking terrible in all country. they found every time a new way form her fucking brain. so rabbis and stupid brain. Maybe they want many many penis.

i think you are so bigoted.. women can handle politics perfectly and can vote well too.. if a woman run a goverment, she doesnt  definitely merge her mothering instinct in her job.. women can handle everything without bothering her motherhood staff..