Author

Topic: Why do islam hates people? - page 192. (Read 437405 times)

legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
January 27, 2015, 11:16:27 AM



British Muslim Group Nominates Two Movies Set In Pre-Islamic Times, “300” And “Exodus” For Their “Islamophobia Awards”…






Islamic Human Rights Commission have announced the nominees for the Islamophobia Awards 2015. Centred around a gala dinner, the event aims to subvert Islamophobia through comedy and revue while simultaneously addressing a serious and significant issue in a creative manner.

This year the awards have been split into four separate categories: UK, International, News Media and Film/Book/TV Series. Nominees were submitted by the general public who had the chance to write in whomever they felt had displayed prominent cases of Islamophobia. The ‘UK’ category sees the likes of David Cameron, Michael Gove and Theresa May as well as the UK government as a whole. Likely contributing factors for each nomination include Gove’s handling of Operation Trojan Horse and May’s enhanced counter-terrorism measures.

The ‘International’ category is not limited in terms of scope; seeing nominees from the USA, France, Germany and Australia. From high-ranking figures such as Angela Merkel to Mayor Marcel Mortreau in France who decided that Muslim pupils at a local school would not be given an alternative meal to pork. ‘News Media’ features both individuals and institutions: FOX News and The Sun received nominations as did columnist Katie Hopkins who famously referred to Palestinians as ‘filthy rodents burrowing beneath Israel.’ A host of films received nominations with popular television series Homeland and Citizen Khan also obtaining honors.

FILM/BOOK/TV SERIES:

300: Rise of Empire – Film

American Sniper – Film

Amira & Sam – Film

Dracula Untold – Film

Exodus: Gods and Kings – Film

Honor Diaries – Film

Oppressed Majority – Film

RoboCop (2014) – Film


http://ihrc.org.uk/activities/press-releases/11344-press-release-nominees-announced-for-islamophobia-awards-2015


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I am guessing Time Traveling is sharia compliant... 

Grin Cheesy Grin





legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
January 26, 2015, 09:51:48 PM
I find this question really hard to answer because we are misinformed by mass media so much.

Personally, I think they really enjoy fighting?

some cultures are more war based than others.


Those with a strong tribal based hierarchy?

full member
Activity: 308
Merit: 100
I'm nothing without GOD
January 26, 2015, 07:02:14 PM
I find this question really hard to answer because we are misinformed by mass media so much.

Personally, I think they really enjoy fighting?

some cultures are more war based than others.
newbie
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
January 26, 2015, 02:50:21 PM
I find this question really hard to answer because we are misinformed by mass media so much.

Personally, I think they really enjoy fighting?
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
January 26, 2015, 12:44:47 PM
Muslim terrorists = cia mi5 assets  Roll Eyes

This ^^.    Smiley
full member
Activity: 223
Merit: 100
January 26, 2015, 08:23:01 AM
Muslim terrorists = cia mi5 assets  Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
January 24, 2015, 09:14:24 PM
Some of the people trying to limit free speech are no better than the Muslims killing people for free speech.


Sure. China is not a fan of free speech. The Saudis are not fans of free speech. China is not known for beheading there citizen yet...


full member
Activity: 308
Merit: 100
I'm nothing without GOD
January 23, 2015, 07:21:40 PM
Some of the people trying to limit free speech are no better than the Muslims killing people for free speech.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
January 23, 2015, 03:24:33 PM
In other words, the reason Muslims hate other people is that the other people ask for it. Muslims don't always hate the people they kill. Sometimes they do it because it is orders from the Koran and their jihad cell.

")
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
January 23, 2015, 03:18:24 PM
So much ignorant hate on this thread I'm gagging.


I agree 100%. Here is another case of intolerance. Totally gag inducing!



‘Liberal,’ ‘Tolerant’ Vanderbilt Muslims Seek To Bully Black Professor Into Silence



A black Vanderbilt University professor’s op-ed critical of Islamic terrorism has touched off a wave of protest by Muslim students and other critics.

The op-ed author is Carol Swain, a longtime professor of law and political science at Vanderbilt and a self-proclaimed political conservative. Her op-ed, entitled “Charlie Hebdo attacks prove critics were right about Islam,” appeared in The Tennessean (Nashville’s main newspaper) on Jan. 15.

Swain, who opposes burqas and advocates stronger efforts at assimilation for American Muslims, argued that radical Islam “poses an absolute danger to us and our children unless it is monitored better than it has been under the Obama administration.”

In response, Muslim students, led by Vanderbilt undergraduate Farishtay Yamin, took great offense.

Yamin told The Vanderbilt Hustler, the campus newspaper, that she “could not believe her eyes” when she read Swain’s column. The student also quickly labeled Swain’s opinion as “hate speech.”

She then used Facebook to set up a “Campus-Wide Protest Against Hate Speech Published in the Tennessean” on Saturday afternoon.

Attendance at the fairly brief event was in the low hundreds, The College Fix reports. Students who showed up brought signs emblazoned with slogans such as “Better a brat than a bigot.”

Yamin, who is the publicity chair for Vanderbilt’s Muslim Student Association, told the audience in no uncertain terms that a black female professor’s speech must be restricted if she says “these kinds of things” in the future.

“What I’m really trying to show her is that she can’t continue to say these kinds of things on a campus that’s so liberal and diverse and tolerant,” Yamin declared.

Swain “used a platform of murdering people to gain publicity,” Yamin charged.

“There is no way the students here are going to allow further attacks on their own peers,” the Muslim undergrad also threatened, according to the Fix.

“And if the university respects us as human beings, it has to come out and condemn these statements and promise us that it’s not going to happen again in the future.”

Mark Bandas, the dean of students at Vanderbilt, also got into the act. He appeared at the “Campus-Wide Protest Against Hate Speech” to offer encouragement.

“Ensuring that this campus is welcoming to, and supportive of, all of our students” is important, he told the assembled dozens. He also urged students to “engage in dialogue” when presented with “polarizing speech.”

Exhibiting an understanding of the First Amendment roughly at the level of Yamin’s, eccentric tea party favorite and 1980s-era “Saturday Night Live” cast member Victoria Jackson also attended the Vanderbilt event — carrying a “ban Sharia” sign. She was with some guy holding a red, white and blue guitar.

This two-person counter-protest fizzled dramatically.

Swain, a professor at prestigious, pricey Vanderbilt since 1999, was once both a high school dropout and a teen mother. Since then, she has earned multiple degrees from fancypants schools and written a number of scholarly books published by leading presses, notes Inside Higher Ed.

The price for one year of undergraduate tuition, room and board and mandatory fees at Vanderbilt is about $54,600 (not including a $704 “first year experience fee”).

The ritzy school’s endowment of over $4 billion equates to $317,179 per student and is larger than the entire annual gross domestic product of Belize and Liberia — combined.

Vanderbilt receives significant amounts of state and federal money each year.

The school has been a hotbed of interesting news lately. This spring, philosophy professor Lisa Guenther is teaching an undergraduate course this spring semester called “Police Violence and Mass Incarceration.”

The course involves discussions of recent violence in Ferguson, Mo., and New York City and how the elite, well-off students feel about allegations of police brutality in the deaths of two black men, Michael Brown and Eric Garner. Course readings include the writings of philosophers such as John Locke as well as musings by a bunch of contemporary bloggers.


http://dailycaller.com/2015/01/21/vanderbilt-muslims-seek-to-bully-black-professor-into-silence/





legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
January 23, 2015, 03:14:01 PM



Hang the sketch, not the sketch makers.   Grin
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
January 23, 2015, 03:09:22 PM
So much ignorant hate on this thread I'm gagging.
legendary
Activity: 1110
Merit: 1000
January 21, 2015, 03:20:14 PM
Incites Violence ... ? Really ?? They are ... for a cartoon ... but they are the first one to make propaganda video where flags are burned .. people killed ...

They are in street to burn church for a cartoon ... but where are they when a video is showed with the name of Allah ... and people decapited ... ? Woman rapped ... book of islamist "manual of woman" ... ?

They have simply a variable geometry of way of thinking !

Silence is giving the signal that you agree !
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
January 21, 2015, 02:59:47 PM



Morgan State University Dean: It Should Be Illegal To Mock Islam Because It “Incites Violence”…





Charlie Hebdo has gone too far.




In its first publication following the Jan. 7 attack on its Paris office, in which two Muslim gunmen massacred 12 people, the once little-known French satirical news weekly crossed the line that separates free speech from toxic talk.

Charlie Hebdo’s latest depiction of the prophet Mohammed — a repeat of the very action that is thought to have sparked the murderous attack on its office — predictably has given rise to widespread violence in nations with large Muslim populations. Its irreverence of Mohammed once moved the French tabloid to portray him naked in a pornographic pose. In another caricature, it showed Mohammed being beheaded by a member of the Islamic State. […]

The most current issue of Charlie Hebdo again has Mohammed on its cover. This time, he appears crying under a headline that reads: “All is forgiven.” Well, apparently not. Ten people have been killed during protests in Niger, a former French colony. Other anti-French riots have erupted from North Africa to Asia. In reaction to all of this, Pope Francis has said of the magazine, “You cannot make fun of the faith of others.”

The French, of course, are no more bound to accept the findings of the bishop of Rome than they are to be guided by the Supreme Court’s rulings on our Constitution’s free speech guarantee. But given the possible ripple effects of Charlie Hebdo’s mistreatment of Islam’s most sacred religious figure, at least people in this country should understand the limits America’s highest court has placed on free speech.

In 1919, the Supreme Court ruled speech that presents a “clear and present danger” is not protected by the First Amendment. Crying “fire” in a quiet, uninhabited place is one thing, the court said. But “the most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic.”

Twenty-two years later, the Supreme Court ruled that forms of expression that “inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace” are fighting words that are not protected by the First Amendment.

If Charlie Hebdo’s irreverent portrayal of Mohammed before the Jan. 7 attack wasn’t thought to constitute fighting words, or a clear and present danger, there should be no doubt now that the newspaper’s continued mocking of the Islamic prophet incites violence. And it pushes Charlie Hebdo’s free speech claim beyond the limits of the endurable.

DeWayne Wickham, dean of Morgan State University’s School of Global Journalism and Communication, writes on Tuesdays for USA TODAY.


http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2015/01/19/charlie-hebdo-cross-line-free-speech-covers-islam-limits-wickham/21960957/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Translation: All muslims cannot control themselves, so you need to help them by limiting your speech. What an insult to muslims!  Smiley




legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
January 14, 2015, 07:30:38 PM


Charlie Hebdo Writer Holds Up Muhammed Cover on Sky News; Network Cuts Away and Apologizes





http://www.mediaite.com/tv/charlie-hebdo-writer-holds-up-muhammed-cover-on-sky-news-network-cuts-away-and-apologizes/



--------------------------------------------------------
... Submission...


legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
January 13, 2015, 01:49:28 PM
Ancient Israel was given a similar (if not clear) command (to this ^^) right in the beginning of the Ten Commandments given to Moses by God. Look in Exodus chapter 20. Israel didn't obey God much of the time.

Smiley

So... Ancient Israel decided to go on and cut off the heads of all who did not follow the commands of their God?

I did not know that. Thank you  Wink




Just because Wilikon exaggerates and mocks now and again doesn't mean he/she/it is a troll or a mocker. In fact, in most of his stuff, he seems right on.

On the other hand, this doesn't mean he is NOT a troll or mocker.

Smiley




The simple answer is: Wilikon lives in a permanent quantum state of YES Troll Mocker/NO Troll Mocker Wink



By the way, while I am doing this thread, I've never once in my life personally felt threaten by a muslim. Ever. It does not mean I should not keep my eyes open. It does not mean I should stay ignorant of the people who believe, those people in the links I am providing, without any retouching as usual  Smiley

I hope more muslims like this dude would take over:

Rotterdam Mayor Ahmed Aboutaleb appeared on television programme Nieuwsuur Wednesday night, and lashed out at Muslims living in this society despite their hatred of it. “It is incomprehensible that you can turn against freedom,” he said. “But if you do not like freedom, in Heaven’s name pack your bag and leave.”

“There may be a place in the world where you can be yourself,” he continued. “Be honest with yourself and do not go and kill innocent journalists,” Aboutaleb, a Muslim himself, said.

“And if you do not like it here because humorists you do not like make a newspaper, may I then say you can fuck off.”
“This is stupid, this so incomprehensible,” he also said. “Vanish from the Netherlands if you cannot find your place here.”

Mayor Aboutaleb also expressed remorse at how Muslims will now be looked at in the Netherlands. “All those well-meaning Muslims here will now be stared at.”


http://www.canadianatheist.com/muslims-who-dont-like-free-speech-can-fuck-off-rotterdam-mayor/







legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
January 13, 2015, 11:34:06 AM
Ancient Israel was given a similar (if not clear) command (to this ^^) right in the beginning of the Ten Commandments given to Moses by God. Look in Exodus chapter 20. Israel didn't obey God much of the time.

Smiley

So... Ancient Israel decided to go on and cut off the heads of all who did not follow the commands of their God?

I did not know that. Thank you  Wink




Just because Wilikon exaggerates and mocks now and again doesn't mean he/she/it is a troll or a mocker. In fact, in most of his stuff, he seems right on.

On the other hand, this doesn't mean he is NOT a troll or mocker.

Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
January 13, 2015, 11:16:02 AM

Enforcement Of Shari'a Law In The Muslim World For Insulting Islam, Prophet Muhammad: A Review Of Recent Arrests, Imprisonment, Flogging, Death Sentences



In Arab and Muslim countries, defaming Islam and the Prophet Muhammad is still defined as an offense against the shari'a that entails punishment. Recent examples of enforcement include the arrest of Saudi intellectual Dr. Turki Al-Hamad and Saudi blogger Hamza Kashgari; another Saudi liberal, Raef Badawi, was sentenced to public flogging, and both Mauritanian blogger Mohamed Cheikh Ould Mkhaitir and Iranian blogger Soheil Arabi were even sentenced to death.

These recent cases were preceded by well-known assassinations or assassination attempts against individuals accused of insulting Islam or the Prophet, such as the fatwa issued by Ayatollah Khomeini in 1989 against the author Salman Rushdie, which called to kill him for his book The Satanic Verses (this fatwa still holds in Iran); the assassination attempt against Nobel laureate Egyptian novelist Naguib Mahfouz for irreverent allusions to Allah and the Prophet in his book Children of Our Neighborhood; the murder of Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh for his film Submission, which shows Koranic verses written on the body of a woman; and fatwas permitting the killing of the artists responsible for the Danish cartoons published in 2005.



Historic Perspective: Punishment Of Prophet's Defamers Based On Koranic Verses, Hadith, Authoritative Sirah Literature (Biographies Of The Prophet)  


According to the shari'a, defaming the Prophet is an act of blasphemy, the punishment for which is death even if the blasphemer repents. This law is Koranic, for Koran 9:61 says: "Those who hurt Allah's Messenger will have a painful punishment." The same Surah also states: "...Say: "(Go ahead and) mock! But certainly Allah will bring to light all that you fear. If you ask them (about this), they declare: 'We were only talking idly and joking.' Say: 'Was it at Allah and His verses and His Messenger that you were mocking? Make no excuse; you have disbelieved after you had believed. [Koran 9:64-66]." In addition, the Sirah literature (biographies of the Prophet) and the Hadith include many instances in which Muhammad ordered to kill his maligners or praised his followers for doing so. In the Muhammad's era, writing poems against him was considered an unforgivable crime, and many poets were killed for this, including the Jewish poet Ka'b bin Al-Ashraf, who would ridicule the Prophet. According to a hadith, he was killed by Muhammad bin Maslama at the behest of the Prophet himself and with his blessing. Al-Waqidi's The Book of History and Campaigns mentions that another poet who composed a poem against Muhammad, the Jewess 'Asma bint Marwan, was assassinated by 'Umayr bin 'Adiy, and the Prophet later praised him for executing her. In his biography of the Prophet, Ibn Hisham relates that Muhammad asked who would kill this woman on his behalf, and a member of her tribe volunteered. Two more poets killed for this crime were Abu 'Afak, who, according to Ibn Sa'd, was assassinated by Salem bin 'Umayr, and the Meccan poet Sarah, whom the Prophet ordered to kill on the day Mecca was conquered, according to Al-Waqidi.

Prominent medieval Islamic scholar Ibn Taymiyya, considered by many to be the father of the modern fundamentalist Islamic movements, wrote on this issue: "Mocking Allah, His verses or His Messenger is blasphemy." He wrote further: "Whosoever curses the Prophet, be he a Muslim of an infidel, must be put to death. All [religious] scholars take this view." The late Saudi mufti 'Abd Al-'Aziz Ibn 'Abdallah Ibn Bazz said: "Anyone who curses Allah or His Messenger Muhammad in any way is a heretic apostate."

Since criticism of Muhammad is still taboo in the Muslim world and cases of it are fairly rare, this act and the punishment it merits are not major topics of debate in Islamist discourse. However, when it does occur – as in the case of Rushdie's book or cartoons lampooning Muhammad – it is regarded as a "crime" whose perpetrator must be punished. Governments in the Muslim world, as well as the sheikhs of the religious establishment, handle this matter according to political considerations, sometimes enforcing strict punishments and sometimes lenient ones, according to the political interests of the moment.


The following are some recent examples of citizens of Muslim countries punished for harming Islam or the Prophet.

http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/8373.htm



------------------------------------------------------------
I learn new stuff everyday...


legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
January 13, 2015, 10:45:34 AM
Ancient Israel was given a similar (if not clear) command (to this ^^) right in the beginning of the Ten Commandments given to Moses by God. Look in Exodus chapter 20. Israel didn't obey God much of the time.

Smiley

So... Ancient Israel decided to go on and cut off the heads of all who did not follow the commands of their God?

I did not know that. Thank you  Wink


Jump to: