and for all the wars that happened, it's because this other religion decided to come into war on Christianity or Buddhism or Judaism.
Christianity has not always been a peaceful religion. Ever wonder why there was a furore about Obama using the word 'crusade' against terrorism.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_wars_of_religionNo I didn't ever wonder about why Obama did some stupid thing, because that's, well, what he does.
I assumed that since he was the US president, he would be considered as Mr Right by all Americans.
Wow....
No, people here I know form a solid line of he "Mr. Wronger than Wrong in his Wrongness".
Lot of propaganda outside of the US on the subject of Obama.
But consider, if Christianity erred when rulers and tyrants used it as a crutch for personal gain, then it is that much worst that Islam codifes the state and religion theocratically.
Oh dear you make wrong interpretation about Islam... Even the muslims tends making wrong interpretation.
The Prophet Muhammed never codifies politic in the Quran-- which many muslims sometimes wrongly interpreted it.
The idea of hating people also wrong. Islam teach about peace and love, not war and hateful.
If a muslim did that, he or she actually doing it for himself...not the religion order it to hate.
There is no wrong interpretation. The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule. Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding. Muslims who do not join the fight are called 'hypocrites' and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter.
Quran (9:5) - "So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them." According to this verse, the best way of staying safe from Muslim violence at the time of Muhammad was to convert to Islam: prayer (salat) and the poor tax (zakat) are among the religion's Five Pillars. The popular claim that the Quran only inspires violence within the context of self-defense is seriously challenged by this passage as well, since the Muslims to whom it was written were obviously not under attack. Had they been, then there would have been no waiting period (earlier verses make it a duty for Muslims to fight in self-defense, even during the sacred months). The historical context is Mecca after the idolaters were subjugated by Muhammad and posed no threat. Once the Muslims had power, they violently evicted those unbelievers who would not convert.
[Note: The verse says to fight unbelievers "wherever you find them". Even if the context is a time of battle (which it was not) the reading appears to sanction attacks against those "unbelievers" who are not on the battlefield. In 2016, the Islamic State referred to this verse in urging the faithful to commit terror attacks: Allah did not only command the 'fighting' of disbelievers, as if to say He only wants us to conduct frontline operations against them. Rather, He has also ordered that they be slain wherever they may be – on or off the battlefield.
This is only 1 passage, there are plenty more where it's clear what he orders and it happens the same with many other religions including Christianity.