Topic: Why do islam hates people? - page 74. (Read 437390 times)

But both points of view can be true.  Yours from a historical perspective, and his from his personal experience.  This is why one must be very careful and correctly phrase sentences and statements.

ISIS would say that Islam is peaceful only towards true Muslims.

What defines Islam. Is Islam only what this person says it is? Is it only what that person says it is?

If you are going to define Islam as peaceful, you have to cut some of the things out of the Quran and the Hadiths. If you keep everything in the Quran and the Hadiths, you will find that Islam is not peaceful, but only temporarily peaceful.

Both Islam and Christianity have used genocide and warfare as a means to gain new converts, during the last many centuries. Tell me the name of a single Muslim majority nation, where Islam was spread peacefully. The non-Muslims were either exterminated (as in Turkey, where the Assyrians, Armenians and Greeks were eradicated in 1915), or forced to accept Islam (the case with Nuristanis and Sarawak tribals).

in fact, in Islam is not taught to hate people, on the contrary. Islam has loved peace. maybe the people of Islam as mentioned in the title above, they do not understand religion in depth. Islam is a religion of tolerance.
I as a Muslim, I do not agree with this topic. because it is not justified that Islam has hated the person.
precisely the contrary, the Islamic religion tells us to respect one another and help others
both among religions and different religions.
Islam is a friend, not an enemy
Islam is not a terrorist, Islam is peaceful
 

The question is, will she ever do it again?   

Video - Woman is caned for being 'close' to a man she was not married









Hundreds of people gathered outside a mosque in Indonesia to see a woman scream out in agony after being caned as a punishment for being in 'close proximity' to a man she wasn't married to.

Nur Elita was marched to the yard of Baiturrahumim Mosque in Banda Aceh for violating the region's strict Sharia laws, after she allegedly showed affectionate behaviour to a fellow university student.

Under the law men and women, who are not spouses, are not allowed to get too close due to the the 'khalwat' offence and punishment is by public caning.

Scroll down for video

The woman is brought to the stage by two female members of the Sharia Police and is put in position on her knees

She screams out in agony after being whipped in a caning ceremony outside a mosque in Indonesia's Banda Aceh region

The woman was forced to endure the punishment after breaking the region's strict Sharia law on being to close to a man she was not married to

After being brought to the stage as the crowd cheered, the woman was forced to kneel down while a masked man repeatedly whipped her with the cane

Hundreds of people gathered outside the mosque in Banda Aceh to watch the caning, with some spectators holding up cameras

In total, the woman received five lashes from the masked man who carried out the caning outside the mosque

After being brought to the stage as the crowd cheered, the woman was forced to kneel down while a masked man repeatedly whipped her with the cane.

She received five lashes and at the end of the punishment could be seen lying on the floor doubled over in pain.

Eventually she was carried off the stage, into an ambulance, and had to be taken to hospital.

The man carrying out the public punishment wore a masked outfit as he caned the woman on the back and shoulders

After her punishment was over the young woman collapsed and could be seen lying on the floor in agony

Despite the punishment being over, she was unable to rise to her feet and was seen lying down clutching her shoulder

She was eventually picked up by officials and carried to a waiting ambulance, where she had to be taken to hospital for treatment

Also being caned was the man she was accused of getting too close to and he was forced to stand while being whipped.

Meanwhile four other men were also forced to endure the punishment for gambling, which is also outlawed under Sharia law.

According to the Jakarta Post, the caning ceremony was carried out in front of the deputy mayor of Banda Aceh Zainal Arifin.

The man that she was accused of getting close to was also brought to the stage afterwards and received the same punishment, pictured

The man was forced to stand as he also received five lashes to his back for breaking strict Sharia law

The masked man, a member of the Sharia Police receives the cane he uses to carry out the public punishment

And before the ceremony he warned the crowd that had gathered that the canings were a lesson to everyone.

He said: 'Take these punishements as a lesson. What has been done by these convicts should not be taken as example.

'And I hope their canings today will be the last ever.'

Banda Aceh is the only province in Indonesia to implement Sharia Law, which was first introduced in 2003 following the province’s awarding of special autonomy status.

Sharia law enforced in Indonesia with public whipping

As well as the couple, four other men were also caned after being found gambling, which is banned under Sharia law

The men were forced to stay on their feet before each being caned five times in front of the cheering crowd

Banda Aceh is the only province in Indonesia to implement Sharia Law, which was first introduced in 2003. Pictured is a man who was accused of violating gambling laws


SHARIA LAW: THE ISLAM LEGAL SYSTEM DERIVED FROM THE KORAN


Sharia law is the legal system of Islam which is derived from both the Koran and the rulings of the religion's scholars.

It acts as a code that all Muslims are adhered to live to and include rules of prayers, fasting and donations to the poor and covers both public and private behaviour.

Offences are divided into two categories - hadd offences, which a serious crimes with set penalties and tazir crimes, where punishment is left to the the discretion of a judge.

Hadd offences include theft, which is punishable by the amputation of the offender's hand and adultery, which can result in being stoned to death.

Apostasy, or leaving the faith, is also against Sharia law and can also be punishable by death.

Other offences against Sharia law include denying Mohammed, gambling, drinking alcohol and women talking to a man, who is not her husband or relative.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3377187/Screaming-agony-woman-caned-crowd-close-proximity-man-not-married-Indonesian-region-s-sharia-law.html#ixzz3viornN7h

That would take out the majority of Muslims, who unsalt Islam by being non-violent.

House Dems Introduce Resolution Condemning Criticism Of Islam…






House Resolution 569 was introduced on December 17th by the Democrats and it’s dangerous. It’s self-described purpose is “condemning violence, bigotry, and hateful rhetoric towards Muslims in the United States.”

There is no proof of a war against Muslims in this country. Racial hate and anti-semitism are far worse problems, but that won’t stop leftists from using it as an excuse to put in laws that damage or destroy the First Amendment.

Democrats have been trying to ban hate speech and now plan to exploit Muslims to achieve their goals.

The measure panders for votes from the Muslim community, a community of people who are conservative and don’t even belong with these leftists. It’s all a prelude to the death of the First Amendment.

Resolutions of this nature have a tendency to be reintroduced later as binding legislation to be forwarded to the Senate. The introduction of this resolution is not yet newsworthy, but it will be if it emerges intact from committee to be voted on by the whole House says Edward Cline at the Rule of Reason.

People behind the resolution include:  Keith Ellison, a Democrat and Muslim from Minnesota; Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Florida Democrat and chairman of the Democratic National Committee; Charles Rangel, New York Democrat; and Alan Grayson, a Democrat from Florida.


http://www.independentsentinel.com/breaking-democrats-introduce-measure-to-condemn-criticism-of-islam/

I have definitely seen my dogs exhibit the emotion of hate and love.  And I think this is well established fact.  So why should I believe any further this logic, when premises are flat wrong?

I think this  question is wrong because
if you know anything about islam or if you read something about islam you can understand why i said this ,
many of people just watching news and see terorists and thinking  islam or muslim people same.  terrorist .It is really not true because religion and choose of people isnt same mean
terrorist is terrorist and religion is religion too
islam religion doesnt support terrorists and terrorism .
who say this it is not true.

That is why I have a hard time explaining the justification of this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostasy_in_Islam

As you know religion is not human and can't feel, love or hate.
Only people have such capacity.
Can they be inspired by religion? Maybe but still they have their own free will to decide if they want to love or hate someone.
We decide for ourselves, daily, not religion or some institution.

Religion can't exist without people. Hate can't exist without people. So can't love, war, or judging other... people.

No human concept, ideas or a belief can be divorced from the fabric of mankind as one needs another human to accept or reject what one stand for. A religion is a set of codes. You follow the codes or you do not.

"Religion can't hate people" you say. Can faith?

Religious texts may be an inspiration for  hate. Muslims often hate Jews, regardless of the country they come from. 

Religion can't hate people.
Only people have capacity to love, or hate someone else.
I don't think that is right to hate other people because of different religion, race, nationality but it's still our reality today, unfortunately.
Still, I don't think that we can blame any religion or ideology for it.
People are individuals persons and each of us decide every day our actions, to love or to hate others.

My face when I realized, according to this hafiz, I was someone else's future property...

US Imam preaching theft, rape and murder in the US

US based Imam, Yasir Qadhi preaches openly that non muslims lives are forfeit and their property is legal for muslims to take in jihad, (and this would include women as sex slaves).

This KAFIR says the Imam is total bullshit.  So you have a curious case, of numerous KAFIRs such as I, being far closer to the True Islam (according to those who say it is love and peace) than Imams such as this asshole.

that's not important; whats important is their fundamental beliefs on how society should be run (in their eyes) have not changed to adapt with modern society. this wouldnt be a problem if it didnt conflict with the modern laws concerning equality and human rights, but they do unfortunately, and people will go far to impose wht they think is right upon others, which is exactly what we see with islamic extremists. this is more or less the radical extreme of fundamentalist religion making what is more or less a last stand in the modern world.

A question for muslims who study (their religion): When I hear on TV "islam is never about hurting innocent people" or something similar...

From the perspective of your prophet and your holy book, are non muslims innocent people?