Pages:
Author

Topic: Why does a purchased account farm all have Lauda on their trust list? lauda alts - page 2. (Read 1188 times)

legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
It shouldn't be difficult to verify this information yourself.....unless of course there is another reason why you don't want to leave these accounts negative trust Roll Eyes
I am going to do pro bono work for you because ...? Cute little rodent.

0. Add self to trust lists of obscure alleged alt accounts.
1. ? ? ?
2. Profit!
Sounds plausible.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
I would also point out that none of these purchased accounts have a negative rating from lauda, even after seeing they are all purchased. Most (all?) of the accounts have neutral ratings from others indicating the accounts have been sold with references/proof.
I will not tag anything on your request given that you have zero credibility, and are a known liar and scammer. You can forget about it. I suggest asking Shorena to do your bidding. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
It shouldn't be difficult to verify this information yourself.....unless of course there is another reason why you don't want to leave these accounts negative trust Roll Eyes
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 2614
If you don’t do PGP, you don’t do crypto!
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I suppose that leaves one question:  What the heck was your dastardly scheme supposed to achieve for you?

Would somebody please enlighten us poor fools who lack the Brainpower to understand this plan for Lauda to TAKE OVER THE WORLD by adding herself to the trust lists of obscure alleged alt accounts?
I've been thinking about it, and I need enlightening too. I couldn't come up with any (not even a small) benefit in adding yourself to the trust list of random (apparently) purchased alt accounts.
Maybe I just forgot because of the alleged pills, which were previously proven by the undeniable words of a friend of a friend reliable unidentified source. Roll Eyes

Well, it’s just the quality of evil-mastermind plan which Quicksy himself would use to TAKE OVER THE WORLD.  Which is why he hasn’t.  Also why he subconsciously assumes that it would make a plausible accusation against you.

-snip-
Nice picture. I remember that.

I was afraid a “Pinky & the Brain” image would get your claws out.  But evidently, you are having too much fun playing cat-and-mouse with Quickseller.



/.

0. Add self to trust lists of obscure alleged alt accounts.
1. ? ? ?
2. Profit!
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I suppose that leaves one question:  What the heck was your dastardly scheme supposed to achieve for you?

Would somebody please enlighten us poor fools who lack the Brainpower to understand this plan for Lauda to TAKE OVER THE WORLD by adding herself to the trust lists of obscure alleged alt accounts?
I've been thinking about it, and I need enlightening too. I couldn't come up with any (not even a small) benefit in adding yourself to the trust list of random (apparently) purchased alt accounts.
Maybe I just forgot because of the alleged pills, which were previously proven by the undeniable words of a friend of a friend reliable unidentified source. Roll Eyes

-snip-
Nice picture. I remember that.
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 2614
If you don’t do PGP, you don’t do crypto!
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I suppose that leaves one question:  What the heck was your dastardly scheme supposed to achieve for you?

Would somebody please enlighten us poor fools who lack the Brainpower to understand this plan for Lauda to TAKE OVER THE WORLD by adding herself to the trust lists of obscure alleged alt accounts?

Loading image...

Pathetic.  Like accusing a wealthy tycoon of counterfeiting Monopoly money so as to “look more rich”.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
I would also point out that none of these purchased accounts have a negative rating from lauda, even after seeing they are all purchased. Most (all?) of the accounts have neutral ratings from others indicating the accounts have been sold with references/proof.
I will not tag anything on your request given that you have zero credibility, and are a known liar and scammer. You can forget about it. I suggest asking Shorena to do your bidding. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
There is more solid proof that they belong to the same person than what you are referring to.
Please, feel free to exhibit the aforementioned proof.
Lauda did a pretty good job of figuring out who these purchased accounts are here.....on his 1st guess Roll Eyes

You can review the sent trust of Operatr, and you will see the connection is admitted via trust ratings.

I would also point out that none of these purchased accounts have a negative rating from lauda, even after seeing they are all purchased. Most (all?) of the accounts have neutral ratings from others indicating the accounts have been sold with references/proof.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
It is a very subtle way of making yourself look more influential than you are in reality in a number of ways.

First, if anyone has the sockpuppet accounts on level 0 (directly on their trust list), or on level 1 (trusted by those on your trust list), then your ratings will show up by default.

Secondly, and more importantly, it helps certain stats that make it easier to account for a "DT1" member keeping you on their trust list (and would booster the argument for a "DT1" member to add you to your trust list -- or booster the argument for others to add you to your trust list). If you look at the trust dump alone, you will see that more people have lauda on their trust than is truly accurate to say. The accounts were created over a fairly large time period, and it would be fairly difficult to spot without the cumbersome, time consuming process of looking at each of the accounts manually (it would be difficult to spot the fact these accounts are all sold via automation). 

Great stuff. Is that how you operated when you were in DT2? Do you still do that?

You haven't denied it therefore proven to be true.
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 2614
If you don’t do PGP, you don’t do crypto!
Slightly unrelated question (to the current argument). What's the benefit of having random sock puppets adding you to your trust list? Like I cant see much "benefit" unless I'm missing out on something

QS did it to try to stitch Lauda up.. it failed as he is a retarded sewer rat.

Nah I meant, not accusing either party. In  hypothetical scenario, say Lauda (or anyone) makes 6-7 accounts or purchases them. Adds themself to the trust list. How does it affect anyone else. Like if it was a trust rating they gave then it would be trust farming but is just that Lauda's rating are shown as trusted to those sock puppets. Now if the purchased accounts were say DT accounts then maybe yeah it would matter
It is a very subtle way of making yourself look more influential than you are in reality in a number of ways.

“Very subtle”.  So very subtle as to be nonexistent in practice!  ’Tis both amusing and revealing, how Quicksy conflates actual power with the external trappings of power.

Mr. Quickseller, please wake up your second brain cell so you may cognize the bare fact that among other things, Lauda has:

  • A corps of supporters who enjoy laughing at you.  Many of them are themselves of high status in this forum.
  • Positive trust ratings from several highly respected personages who are known to be sparing in their praise and conservative in their vouches.  Most influential to me was Lauda’s positive feedback from Core superstar gmaxwell:  “Polite thoughtful communication. Seems to keep their head under fire.”
  • The actual power to inflict serious pain on basement-dwelling scammers such as yourself.

Why would someone who has all that need to manufacture fake supporters in some way so small and “very subtle” that few people would even notice?  I mean, really:  How many people analyze the trust database?  Most people just look to the feedback.  A trust list entry only holds significance for more than one person when the lister is DT.  What, exactly, would be achieved by adding some nobody alt entries?

The absurdity of this charge, of this whole thread, is demonstrative of Quickseller’s thought process:  Manufacturing spurious trust list entries for himself to “look more influential” is precisely the kind of thing Quickseller would do.  Most people are unable to view the world through any eyes but their own:  Quickseller would (futilely) fabricate the external trappings of power in an attempt to inflate himself; ergo, to Quickseller, it seems a plausible accusation against Lauda.

Pathetic.  Like accusing a wealthy tycoon of counterfeiting Monopoly money so as to “look more rich”.

Actual power, Quicksy.  That’s what Lauda has, and you never will.  You are incapable of even understanding it.

* nullius chuckles wryly.

First, if anyone has the sockpuppet accounts on level 0 (directly on their trust list), or on level 1 (trusted by those on your trust list), then your ratings will show up by default.

Having been backed into a corner by Red Painter’s eminently logical question, Quickseller misfires.  Hey, Quicksy:  Have you hereto accused Lauda of having DT sockpuppets add her to their trust lists?  Or do you wish to do so now?

Or are you worried about all the people who meticulously search for obscure alt accounts to add to their own trust lists, so they can accidentally trust Lauda without even knowing it?  How very thoughtful of you, to show such empathy for psychotic retards who somehow have the ability to trawl the trust database.  Quickseller, the valiant champion of the insane idiot-savants, defends them against Lauda’s evil plan to swindle them for their trust!  Lauda is foiled!

Secondly, and more importantly, it helps certain stats that make it easier to account for a "DT1" member keeping you on their trust list (and would booster the argument for a "DT1" member to add you to your trust list -- or booster the argument for others to add you to your trust list). If you look at the trust dump alone, you will see that more people have lauda on their trust than is truly accurate to say. The accounts were created over a fairly large time period, and it would be fairly difficult to spot without the cumbersome, time consuming process of looking at each of the accounts manually (it would be difficult to spot the fact these accounts are all sold via automation).

Wait, do you here suggest that DT1 members be morons?  Well, some of them are; but they already exclude Lauda.  I should hope the remainder are too savvy to use the above-described Quickseller method of blindly looking at arbitrary numbers as a major factor in choosing whom to add to their own trust lists.


QS did it to try to stitch Lauda up.. it failed as he is a retarded sewer rat.

No no no no, Quicksy was very adamant when he was answering a question nobody would ask:

One of these accounts was last active as of late May 2017, and most were last active as of June 2017, so I can rule out someone recently adding Lauda to their trust lists.

Translation: "I didn't do it, honest".

Red Painter nailed it from one side, thus revealing Quicksy’s thought process about what might make a plausible accusation:  A habituated counterfeiter would be one to accuse a millionaire of counterfeiting Monopoly money, yes.  Then, suchmoon hammers it home from the other side:  What is the logical end of this Quicksy-thinking as misapplied to Lauda, when Quickseller applies it back to himself?  Hmmm.  Known dealer in alt accounts who has previously sold a DT account to a scammer pops up with “evidence” (i.e. wild accusations) that some alts have trustlisted Lauda.  What might a reasonable person suspect from that?

Now if the purchased accounts were say DT accounts then maybe yeah it would matter

First, if anyone has the sockpuppet accounts on level 0 (directly on their trust list), or on level 1 (trusted by those on your trust list), then your ratings will show up by default.

Red Painter, quit whining.  Mr. Quickseller is fresh out of DT accounts, at this particular moment (or so we hope).

Any further questions?

There is more solid proof that they belong to the same person than what you are referring to.
Please, feel free to exhibit the aforementioned proof.

I guess that means, “No.”
copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
There is more solid proof that they belong to the same person than what you are referring to.
Please, feel free to exhibit the aforementioned proof.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
Slightly unrelated question (to the current argument). What's the benefit of having random sock puppets adding you to your trust list? Like I cant see much "benefit" unless I'm missing out on something

QS did it to try to stitch Lauda up.. it failed as he is a retarded sewer rat.

Nah I meant, not accusing either party. In  hypothetical scenario, say Lauda (or anyone) makes 6-7 accounts or purchases them. Adds themself to the trust list. How does it affect anyone else. Like if it was a trust rating they gave then it would be trust farming but is just that Lauda's rating are shown as trusted to those sock puppets. Now if the purchased accounts were say DT accounts then maybe yeah it would matter
It is a very subtle way of making yourself look more influential than you are in reality in a number of ways.

First, if anyone has the sockpuppet accounts on level 0 (directly on their trust list), or on level 1 (trusted by those on your trust list), then your ratings will show up by default.

Secondly, and more importantly, it helps certain stats that make it easier to account for a "DT1" member keeping you on their trust list (and would booster the argument for a "DT1" member to add you to your trust list -- or booster the argument for others to add you to your trust list). If you look at the trust dump alone, you will see that more people have lauda on their trust than is truly accurate to say. The accounts were created over a fairly large time period, and it would be fairly difficult to spot without the cumbersome, time consuming process of looking at each of the accounts manually (it would be difficult to spot the fact these accounts are all sold via automation). 
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
But is that data publicly accessible easily though? I can see trust on the left side in most of the board. But messing around with the trust settings is a pain and if I'm not mistaking something QS seems to have checked the trust dump (which I'm assuming is a data dump which would require you to actually take some effort to analyse and clearly beyond what the average joe would bother with)

I think in theory you could set a large trust depth number on your settings page and see the lower levels of trust links. But in reality nobody's gonna do that for any practical purpose, so yes, it would be quite useless to use sockpuppets this way.

QS did it to try to stitch Lauda up.. it failed as he is a retarded sewer rat.

No no no no, Quicksy was very adamant when he was answering a question nobody would ask:

One of these accounts was last active as of late May 2017, and most were last active as of June 2017, so I can rule out someone recently adding Lauda to their trust lists.

Translation: "I didn't do it, honest".
member
Activity: 504
Merit: 20
Slightly unrelated question (to the current argument). What's the benefit of having random sock puppets adding you to your trust list? Like I cant see much "benefit" unless I'm missing out on something

QS did it to try to stitch Lauda up.. it failed as he is a retarded sewer rat.

Nah I meant, not accusing either party. In  hypothetical scenario, say Lauda (or anyone) makes 6-7 accounts or purchases them. Adds themself to the trust list. How does it affect anyone else. Like if it was a trust rating they gave then it would be trust farming but is just that Lauda's rating are shown as trusted to those sock puppets. Now if the purchased accounts were say DT accounts then maybe yeah it would matter
If 1000 people have me in their trust list but only 10 have you, then to just a casual observe I would appear more trustworthy.. That's about the only thing I can come up with.


But is that data publicly accessible easily though? I can see trust on the left side in most of the board. But messing around with the trust settings is a pain and if I'm not mistaking something QS seems to have checked the trust dump (which I'm assuming is a data dump which would require you to actually take some effort to analyse and clearly beyond what the average joe would bother with)
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 2614
If you don’t do PGP, you don’t do crypto!
QS did it to try to stitch Lauda up.. it failed as he is a retarded sewer rat.

I have a question about an accusation of mysterious identities; and I am looking for a totally random sockpuppet accusation thread in which I can post it.  This will do.

In response to this:

[...]

Hmmm... are you sure you're not Lauda?  Huh Shocked
He is not. However he does have a vested interest in seeing that lauda maintains a positive reputation.

Instead of seeing that lauda acts with integrity, he tries to get others to overlook laudas unethical actions.

nullius is lauda. That is very clear. Anyone who does not see this is simply closing their eyes.

Thus spake Quicksy:

I don't think you are lauda anymore, which should be clear by the post you quoted. I do still think you are a very dishonest person who has a long history of dishonesty. This is not something new to you, considering how long people have been calling you dishonest around here....I am pretty sure there are threads from 2011 in which people were calling you dishonest.

My question is:  Who the hell am I?  Seriously.  If I am discussed in threads from 2011, I most certainly want to know about that!


Or at least, thanks for closing your eyes so you no longer see that I am very clearly Lauda.
I think you are Lauda though, or maybe I just want you to be Lauda. I am not really sure anymore. Lips sealed

Purr.  ← PROOF that I am Lauda!
sr. member
Activity: 686
Merit: 320
Slightly unrelated question (to the current argument). What's the benefit of having random sock puppets adding you to your trust list? Like I cant see much "benefit" unless I'm missing out on something

QS did it to try to stitch Lauda up.. it failed as he is a retarded sewer rat.

Nah I meant, not accusing either party. In  hypothetical scenario, say Lauda (or anyone) makes 6-7 accounts or purchases them. Adds themself to the trust list. How does it affect anyone else. Like if it was a trust rating they gave then it would be trust farming but is just that Lauda's rating are shown as trusted to those sock puppets. Now if the purchased accounts were say DT accounts then maybe yeah it would matter
If 1000 people have me in their trust list but only 10 have you, then to just a casual observe I would appear more trustworthy.. That's about the only thing I can come up with.
legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1808
Exchange Bitcoin quickly-https://blockchain.com.do
Slightly unrelated question (to the current argument). What's the benefit of having random sock puppets adding you to your trust list? Like I cant see much "benefit" unless I'm missing out on something

QS did it to try to stitch Lauda up.. it failed as he is a retarded sewer rat.

Nah I meant, not accusing either party. In  hypothetical scenario, say Lauda (or anyone) makes 6-7 accounts or purchases them. Adds themself to the trust list. How does it affect anyone else. Like if it was a trust rating they gave then it would be trust farming but is just that Lauda's rating are shown as trusted to those sock puppets. Now if the purchased accounts were say DT accounts then maybe yeah it would matter

As I said it is just QS playing games. It means nothing bud
jr. member
Activity: 35
Merit: 3
Slightly unrelated question (to the current argument). What's the benefit of having random sock puppets adding you to your trust list? Like I cant see much "benefit" unless I'm missing out on something

QS did it to try to stitch Lauda up.. it failed as he is a retarded sewer rat.

Nah I meant, not accusing either party. In  hypothetical scenario, say Lauda (or anyone) makes 6-7 accounts or purchases them. Adds themself to the trust list. How does it affect anyone else. Like if it was a trust rating they gave then it would be trust farming but is just that Lauda's rating are shown as trusted to those sock puppets. Now if the purchased accounts were say DT accounts then maybe yeah it would matter
legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1808
Exchange Bitcoin quickly-https://blockchain.com.do
Slightly unrelated question (to the current argument). What's the benefit of having random sock puppets adding you to your trust list? Like I cant see much "benefit" unless I'm missing out on something

QS did it to try to stitch Lauda up.. it failed as he is a retarded sewer rat.
jr. member
Activity: 35
Merit: 3
Slightly unrelated question (to the current argument). What's the benefit of having random sock puppets adding you to your trust list? Like I cant see much "benefit" unless I'm missing out on something
copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
There is more solid proof that they belong to the same person than what you are referring to.
Please, feel free to exhibit the aforementioned proof.
Pages:
Jump to: