Topic: Why does a purchased account farm all have Lauda on their trust list? lauda alts - page 4. (Read 1184 times)
February 23, 2018, 02:24:38 AM
So you are saying that you have absolutely nothing to do with all these accounts adding you to their trust list? I want to be very clear on this.
February 23, 2018, 02:20:00 AM
Actually significantly less than 50% of those who excluded you have a "warning: Trade with extreme caution" tag on their profile because of you.
Actually you have no idea what you are talking about. A prime example would be DeepOnion shills, where both of accounts of their *trust master* got tagged. Thus, the army went to exclude me not that that actually did anything.The purpose of this thread is to question why a certain number of purchased accounts all clearly owned by the same person all have you on their trust list.
To the best of my knowledge, I can only reply with the following:Dance Iago, dance.
February 23, 2018, 02:17:53 AM
Over 50% of the accounts that excluded me are farmed/tagged accounts,
Actually significantly less than 50% of those who excluded you have a "warning: Trade with extreme caution" tag on their profile because of you. The purpose of this thread is to question why a certain number of purchased accounts all clearly owned by the same person all have you on their trust list.
February 23, 2018, 02:14:31 AM
Over 50% of the accounts that excluded me are farmed/tagged accounts, thus no argument can be made from a mere 11%. I don't look at the trust dump (aside from when you brought it up very recently), and frankly do not care who does what there. Go complain to shorena or something snowflake. 
Dance Iago, dance.
Dance Iago, dance.
February 23, 2018, 02:13:39 AM
While reviewing those who have the extrotionist lauda on their trust list as of the last trust dump (from I believe Feb 17, 2018), and I came across something very concerning.
A total of 53 people have Lauda on this trust list (which is roughly 1/2 of the number of people who have excluded Lauda from their trust list).
What is most concerning is that of the 53 accounts who have Lauda on their trust list, 6 accounts are part of a farm of purchased accounts that are owned by the same person. I am wanting to know why over 11% of those who have lauda on their trust list are all owned by the same person.
These accounts were purchased on or around (very broadly) January 2016, yet none of them have negative trust from Lauda (as of early morning Feb 22, 2018). I also came across an account seller while reviewing these very clearly sold accounts that also does not have negative trust from Lauda.
I would also like to know why neither any of these 6 accounts nor the account seller have any kind of negative trust from Lauda.
One of these accounts was last active as of late May 2017, and most were last active as of June 2017, so I can rule out someone recently adding Lauda to their trust lists.
If this is true statement, then someone should Tag all those accounts and the one who are trust farming should be removed from Trust list.A total of 53 people have Lauda on this trust list (which is roughly 1/2 of the number of people who have excluded Lauda from their trust list).
What is most concerning is that of the 53 accounts who have Lauda on their trust list, 6 accounts are part of a farm of purchased accounts that are owned by the same person. I am wanting to know why over 11% of those who have lauda on their trust list are all owned by the same person.
These accounts were purchased on or around (very broadly) January 2016, yet none of them have negative trust from Lauda (as of early morning Feb 22, 2018). I also came across an account seller while reviewing these very clearly sold accounts that also does not have negative trust from Lauda.
I would also like to know why neither any of these 6 accounts nor the account seller have any kind of negative trust from Lauda.
One of these accounts was last active as of late May 2017, and most were last active as of June 2017, so I can rule out someone recently adding Lauda to their trust lists.
I hope someone from DT! should take a look into this matter and take necessary steps.
February 23, 2018, 01:51:52 AM
While reviewing those who have the extrotionist lauda on their trust list as of the last trust dump (from I believe Feb 17, 2018), and I came across something very concerning.
A total of 53 people have Lauda on this trust list (which is roughly 1/2 of the number of people who have excluded Lauda from their trust list).
What is most concerning is that of the 53 accounts who have Lauda on their trust list, 6 accounts are part of a farm of purchased accounts that are owned by the same person. I am wanting to know why over 11% of those who have lauda on their trust list are all owned by the same person.
These accounts were purchased on or around (very broadly) January 2016, yet none of them have negative trust from Lauda (as of early morning Feb 22, 2018). I also came across an account seller while reviewing these very clearly sold accounts that also does not have negative trust from Lauda.
I would also like to know why neither any of these 6 accounts nor the account seller have any kind of negative trust from Lauda.
One of these accounts was last active as of late May 2017, and most were last active as of June 2017, so I can rule out someone recently adding Lauda to their trust lists.
edit:
Lauda has neglected to answer questions regarding if he has added himself to his sockpuppets trust lists, and has neglected to answer questions regarding if he has lobbied or given incentives for people to add him to their trust lists.
[1] Relatively easy to create a trap this way; somewhat predictable.
Maybe I should rephrase my question, have you ever lobbied (or otherwise incentivized) anyone to add you to their trust list? This would include lobbying anyone with a farm of accounts to add you to their trust list.
Or maybe I should ask another question.....do any of your alts, past and/or present, have you on your trust list?
edit2:
Lauda himself was able to "figure out" which accounts I am referring to, however has refused to leave negative trust against any of them despite him making a name for himself as someone who leaves negative trust against "all" sold accounts.
A total of 53 people have Lauda on this trust list (which is roughly 1/2 of the number of people who have excluded Lauda from their trust list).
What is most concerning is that of the 53 accounts who have Lauda on their trust list, 6 accounts are part of a farm of purchased accounts that are owned by the same person. I am wanting to know why over 11% of those who have lauda on their trust list are all owned by the same person.
These accounts were purchased on or around (very broadly) January 2016, yet none of them have negative trust from Lauda (as of early morning Feb 22, 2018). I also came across an account seller while reviewing these very clearly sold accounts that also does not have negative trust from Lauda.
I would also like to know why neither any of these 6 accounts nor the account seller have any kind of negative trust from Lauda.
One of these accounts was last active as of late May 2017, and most were last active as of June 2017, so I can rule out someone recently adding Lauda to their trust lists.
edit:
Lauda has neglected to answer questions regarding if he has added himself to his sockpuppets trust lists, and has neglected to answer questions regarding if he has lobbied or given incentives for people to add him to their trust lists.
So you are saying that you have absolutely nothing to do with all these accounts adding you to their trust list? I want to be very clear on this.
I don't even know what accounts you are talking about[1]. Thus I can absolutely not be clear about anything.[1] Relatively easy to create a trap this way; somewhat predictable.
Or maybe I should ask another question.....do any of your alts, past and/or present, have you on your trust list?
edit2:
Lauda himself was able to "figure out" which accounts I am referring to, however has refused to leave negative trust against any of them despite him making a name for himself as someone who leaves negative trust against "all" sold accounts.
Jump to: