Pages:
Author

Topic: Why does a purchased account farm all have Lauda on their trust list? lauda alts (Read 1184 times)

legendary
Activity: 3570
Merit: 1959
I have already shown lauda to be guilty of extortion....

You are the furthest thing possible from a fair and impartial judge, bozo.

You've accused Lauda of extortion.  You need to prove it in court.

The asshat is now leaving shitposts in my auctions (actually, one is for another trusted member, so that is really assholeish of him) about the "alleged" extortion bs, which actually really had nothing to do with me, I was giving him a hard time about another matter someone had told me about, which was operating ponzi's). Once he cleared that up, I left him alone and others went on the extortion bit.

Anyhow, fuck QScammer. He doesn't care about actual facts, he just his little weenie jollies off fucking up other's people shit, specifically anyone who is "Friends" (Huh) or has lauda on their trustlists.

Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
I have already shown lauda to be guilty of extortion....

You are the furthest thing possible from a fair and impartial judge, bozo.

You've accused Lauda of extortion.  You need to prove it in court.
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 2614
If you don’t do PGP, you don’t do crypto!
i hope you all dont mind that i ask this question here. but i really would like to understand what is going on.

what started the battle: Quickseller vs Lauda?

Quicksy has pursued grudges against a wide range of different people, from tspacepilot to dooglus to Zepher, generally for outing him in some form of wrongdoing.  He even went after Vod—and after everybody who declined to condemn Vod, viz., Quickseller vs. The World:

https://web.archive.org/web/20180309172034/https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/vod-is-a-violent-person-who-should-not-be-trusted-1614573;all

Ready to red-tag all those heinous scoundrels?

Whereas Lauda has a special place as his psychotic obsession.  I am jealous of Lauda...

I infer that Quickseller is secretly a genius who is performing research for his upcoming book, How to Win make Enemies and Not Influence People.

P.S., I think Quickseller really should kill himself.  Again:  I really wish the guy would kill himself already.  HTH.
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1117
i hope you all dont mind that i ask this question here. but i really would like to understand what is going on.

what started the battle: Quickseller vs Lauda?
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
geez what a fmoron

Can you please post actual proof of Lauda being an account-farming pill addict and be done with it. This "she didn't deny it" insinuation is getting boring. Of course Lauda isn't gonna dance to your music, mainly because you're an idiot, and also I can't imagine a cat obeying anybody or anything. So just go ahead and stop wasting everyone's time.
legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1808
Exchange Bitcoin quickly-https://blockchain.com.do
Hey quickspazzer you have repeatedly shown what a window licker you are
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
Perhaps that may be because you fail to understand the explanation that no intelligent person would bother with repetitious back-and-forth over charges so nonsensical on their face as to be cartoonish.

But put that aside.  Didn’t you see the news?  Lauda has confessed guilt on the substantial essence of all your charges!

Embarrassed Guilty;

Feel better, now?  Is your craving thus satisfied?
Actually you are quoting a nonsense post by lauda

Where’s the sarcasm shill with that fancy paid /s signature ad?  I fear that I myself may be incapable of explaining this to Mr. Quickseller.

But let me try:  My quote provided exactly the answer your accusations are worth.  It should also satisfy you, given how determined you evidently are to find Lauda guilty of something—no matter how nonsensical.  Well, I suppose that Lauda must be guilty of something—behold the confession!  Happy now?  Everybody wins.  Don’t thank me; I’m just happy to help.
I have already shown lauda to be guilty of extortion....
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 2614
If you don’t do PGP, you don’t do crypto!
Perhaps that may be because you fail to understand the explanation that no intelligent person would bother with repetitious back-and-forth over charges so nonsensical on their face as to be cartoonish.

But put that aside.  Didn’t you see the news?  Lauda has confessed guilt on the substantial essence of all your charges!

Embarrassed Guilty;

Feel better, now?  Is your craving thus satisfied?
Actually you are quoting a nonsense post by lauda

Where’s the sarcasm shill with that fancy paid /s signature ad?  I fear that I myself may be incapable of explaining this to Mr. Quickseller.

But let me try:  My quote provided exactly the answer your accusations are worth.  It should also satisfy you, given how determined you evidently are to find Lauda guilty of something—no matter how nonsensical.  Well, I suppose that Lauda must be guilty of something—behold the confession!  Happy now?  Everybody wins.  Don’t thank me; I’m just happy to help.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
Perhaps that may be because you fail to understand the explanation that no intelligent person would bother with repetitious back-and-forth over charges so nonsensical on their face as to be cartoonish.

But put that aside.  Didn’t you see the news?  Lauda has confessed guilt on the substantial essence of all your charges!

Embarrassed Guilty;

Feel better, now?  Is your craving thus satisfied?
Actually you are quoting a nonsense post by lauda
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1145
What if...

Lauda = Quickseller?Huh?

 Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked

Im 200 iq.

You were so close to the truth:

There are only two users on this forum: Quickseller and Lauda. Everyone else is a sockpuppet of one of those two.

(And the two cases of sockpuppet can be clearly differentiated based on intelligence.)


 Grin Grin Grin
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 2614
If you don’t do PGP, you don’t do crypto!
What if...

Lauda = Quickseller?Huh?

 Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked

Im 200 iq.

You were so close to the truth:

There are only two users on this forum: Quickseller and Lauda. Everyone else is a sockpuppet of one of those two.

(And the two cases of sockpuppet can be clearly differentiated based on intelligence.)
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1145
What if...

Lauda = Quickseller?Huh?

 Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked

Im 200 iq.
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 2614
If you don’t do PGP, you don’t do crypto!
That would not explain why lauda has failed to leave negative trust against these accounts.

The only explanation I can give is that these belong to lauda....

Perhaps that may be because you fail to understand the explanation that no intelligent person would bother with repetitious back-and-forth over charges so nonsensical on their face as to be cartoonish.

But put that aside.  Didn’t you see the news?  Lauda has confessed guilt on the substantial essence of all your charges!

Embarrassed Guilty;

Feel better, now?  Is your craving thus satisfied?
legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1808
Exchange Bitcoin quickly-https://blockchain.com.do
Is anyone able to give an explanation as to why lauda is unable to give negative trust to so many clearly purchased accounts besides that these are his sockpuppets?

Hey quickspazzer.. I would imagine it is because you bought it to everyone's attention.. that and you are a cunt
That would not explain why lauda has failed to leave negative trust against these accounts.

The only explanation I can give is that these belong to lauda....

It's a perfect explanation. If I were Lauda and I had 301 things to do and 1 thing was associated with you princess.. guess what would be done last. Yep that's right the thing that is tainted by quickspazzer
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
Is anyone able to give an explanation as to why lauda is unable to give negative trust to so many clearly purchased accounts besides that these are his sockpuppets?

Hey quickspazzer.. I would imagine it is because you bought it to everyone's attention.. that and you are a cunt
That would not explain why lauda has failed to leave negative trust against these accounts.

The only explanation I can give is that these belong to lauda....
legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1808
Exchange Bitcoin quickly-https://blockchain.com.do
Is anyone able to give an explanation as to why lauda is unable to give negative trust to so many clearly purchased accounts besides that these are his sockpuppets?

Hey quickspazzer.. I would imagine it is because you bought it to everyone's attention.. that and you are a cunt
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
Is anyone able to give an explanation as to why lauda is unable to give negative trust to so many clearly purchased accounts besides that these are his sockpuppets?
legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1808
Exchange Bitcoin quickly-https://blockchain.com.do
So in other words, lauda makes a name for himself for leaving negative trust for what he says are sold accounts, and not listening to arguments of those that say he is wrong. But when the sold accounts have lauda on their trust list, lauda refuses to leave negative ratings.

I believe a reasonable, neutral person would see this as fairly clear evidence that lauda is leaving negative trust only on certain "sold accounts" in order to help his own account selling business.

If someone other than you proves these are farmed accounts I bet Lauda would tag them.

Don't you see that Lauda thinks you are lower on the food chain than a cancerous cockroach
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
...and not listening to arguments of those that say he is wrong.
Que Huh

I believe a reasonable, neutral person would see this as fairly clear evidence that lauda is leaving negative trust only on certain "sold accounts" in order to help his own account selling business.
In preponderance of evidence, and some other-unrelated stuff, Lauda is guilty of this. Yeah, yeah we know your trolling drill already. Once a pest, always a pest.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
So in other words, lauda makes a name for himself for leaving negative trust for what he says are sold accounts, and not listening to arguments of those that say he is wrong. But when the sold accounts have lauda on their trust list, lauda refuses to leave negative ratings.

I believe a reasonable, neutral person would see this as fairly clear evidence that lauda is leaving negative trust only on certain "sold accounts" in order to help his own account selling business.
Pages:
Jump to: