Topic: Why Google Is the New Evil Empire - page 2. (Read 11347 times)
Google Removes Gab’s Android App From Play Store Over ‘Hate Speech’
Gab.ai CEO Andrew Torba took to Twitter Thursday evening to report the social media platform’s Andriod app was removed from the Google Play Store.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/08/google-removes-gabs-android-app-google-play-store-hate-speech/
-------------------------
Smells more like anti competition than hate speech. Twtr is full of porn and yet Apple got rid of Gab... for porn.
It means the creature is afraid of losing control of its centralized control.
I like Google, I can't image if Google is disappear how can I got the information I need. It really convince for my work.
Yeah i dont really think that it giving us evil, cause it helps a lot in work and also for the students
Quote
The worse part is it is not even his opinion, but science facts
This is the thing that gets me. He's stating scientific facts that are proven today, and have been proven for centuries. He's not saying women have no right to be engineers, he's just saying men are more likely to strive for status type positions. We're truly loosing our minds; we're choosing peoples emotions over truth. What's next... people getting fired because they say men are better at growing mustaches than women? I've seem some women with pretty healthy mustaches but that doesn't disprove the prior comment, nor does it make me hateful.
Men with beards are more likely to be sexist.
Despite the recent popularity of beards, facial hair can be controversial: as we’ve previously shown, it makes men less likely to get hired and more likely to be seen as guilty by a jury. Well, all you beard-haters out there, here’s some more ammunition for you. In this study, researchers surveyed men from the USA and India on both their facial hair and their attitudes towards women. They found that men with beards were more likely to be sexist, and they hypothesized that men who have sexist attitudes choose to grow beards to make them look more masculine and dominant. Nice try, Santa Claus.
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/seriouslyscience/2015/11/25/men-with-beards-are-more-likely-to-be-sexist/
-----------------------------------
Are you red-pilled yet?
Well... there you go. We truly are driving over the cliff as a society. The world is so full of micro-transgressions that it's impossible to do anything without being accused of something.
I like Google, I can't image if Google is disappear how can I got the information I need. It really convince for my work.
Yeah i dont really think that it giving us evil, cause it helps a lot in work and also for the students Quote
The worse part is it is not even his opinion, but science facts
This is the thing that gets me. He's stating scientific facts that are proven today, and have been proven for centuries. He's not saying women have no right to be engineers, he's just saying men are more likely to strive for status type positions. We're truly loosing our minds; we're choosing peoples emotions over truth. What's next... people getting fired because they say men are better at growing mustaches than women? I've seem some women with pretty healthy mustaches but that doesn't disprove the prior comment, nor does it make me hateful.
Men with beards are more likely to be sexist.
Despite the recent popularity of beards, facial hair can be controversial: as we’ve previously shown, it makes men less likely to get hired and more likely to be seen as guilty by a jury. Well, all you beard-haters out there, here’s some more ammunition for you. In this study, researchers surveyed men from the USA and India on both their facial hair and their attitudes towards women. They found that men with beards were more likely to be sexist, and they hypothesized that men who have sexist attitudes choose to grow beards to make them look more masculine and dominant. Nice try, Santa Claus.
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/seriouslyscience/2015/11/25/men-with-beards-are-more-likely-to-be-sexist/
-----------------------------------
Are you red-pilled yet?
Quote
The worse part is it is not even his opinion, but science facts
This is the thing that gets me. He's stating scientific facts that are proven today, and have been proven for centuries. He's not saying women have no right to be engineers, he's just saying men are more likely to strive for status type positions. We're truly loosing our minds; we're choosing peoples emotions over truth. What's next... people getting fired because they say men are better at growing mustaches than women? I've seem some women with pretty healthy mustaches but that doesn't disprove the prior comment, nor does it make me hateful.
Diamond and Silk rip YouTube, say 95% of videos demonetized over Trump support
Two of President Trump’s most ardent supporters, the YouTube stars known as Diamond and Silk, say a financial stranglehold has been placed on their videos.
Lynnette Hardway and Rochelle Richardson of North Carolina, whose support of Mr. Trump and no-nonsense delivery during the 2016 U.S. presidential season turned them into online sensations, said Thursday their YouTube videos have become casualties of the company’s attempt to silence “extremism.”
“@YouTube @TeamYouTube stopped over 95% percent of our videos from being monetized, stating: ‘It’s Not Suitable For All Advertisers,’” the two said in a series of tweets. “Wonder if @YouTube @TeamYouTube stopped the monetization of our videos because we are loyal supporters of the @POTUS. Hummmm. Sounds like Censorship to us, which is a Violation of our First Amendment. A Bias Method used to Silence our Conservative Voices. @YouTube, how was it OK to monetize our videos for the past two years and now those same videos are no longer eligible for monetization?”
The popular duo, who were also paid $1,275 for “field consulting” work by the Trump campaign, boast 89,000 subscribers on YouTube and another 361,000 on Twitter.
News of the largely demonetized channel comes less than two weeks since the company announced plans to fight inappropriate content.
“We’ll soon be applying tougher treatment to videos that aren’t illegal but have been flagged by users as potential violations of our policies on hate speech and violent extremism,” the company announced Aug. 1 on its official blog. “If we find that these videos don’t violate our policies but contain controversial religious or supremacist content, they will be placed in a limited state
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/aug/10/diamond-and-silk-rip-youtube-say-95-of-videos-demo/
Has anybody read the actual memo that started the controversy? I mean the actual memo, not someone's analysis of it. I read it and I can't understand why he was fired. Google's reaction to this is very concerning; they've essentially proved his very point.
https://diversitymemo.com/
https://diversitymemo.com/
Quote
"Google’s left bias has created a politically correct monoculture that maintains its hold by shaming dissenters into silence. This silence removes any checks against encroaching extremist and authoritarian policies."
The worse part is it is not even his opinion, but science facts
Google CEO: ‘Harmful’ James Damore Manifesto Hurt Employees, Made Them ‘Feel Judged’
Google CEO Sundar Pichai defended the dismissal of former Google employee James Damore in a blog post on Tuesday, where he called Damore’s manifesto “harmful.”
“First, let me say that we strongly support the right of Googlers to express themselves, and much of what was in that memo is fair to debate, regardless of whether a vast majority of Googlers disagree with it,” Pichai opined in the blog post. “However, portions of the memo violate our Code of Conduct and cross the line by advancing harmful gender stereotypes in our workplace.”
“To suggest a group of our colleagues have traits that make them less biologically suited to that work is offensive and not OK. It is contrary to our basic values and our Code of Conduct, which expects ‘each Googler to do their utmost to create a workplace culture that is free of harassment, intimidation, bias and unlawful discrimination,'” he continued.
Pichai then claimed that the manifesto “clearly impacted our co-workers, some of whom are hurting and feel judged based on their gender,” and added, “Our co-workers shouldn’t have to worry that each time they open their mouths to speak in a meeting, they have to prove that they are not like the memo states, being ‘agreeable’ rather than ‘assertive,’ showing a ‘lower stress tolerance,’ or being ‘neurotic.'”
http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2017/08/10/google-ceo-harmful-james-damore-manifesto/
Has anybody read the actual memo that started the controversy? I mean the actual memo, not someone's analysis of it. I read it and I can't understand why he was fired. Google's reaction to this is very concerning; they've essentially proved his very point.
https://diversitymemo.com/
https://diversitymemo.com/
Quote
"Google’s left bias has created a politically correct monoculture that maintains its hold by shaming dissenters into silence. This silence removes any checks against encroaching extremist and authoritarian policies."
because they've become so big that most of the people rely on their products and with that they have to power to influence and push various propaganda to the masses and people are just too dependent on them with youtube, google as a search engine,... similar to facebook, people just don't want to switch to another platform just because.
I'd love to move away from Google but they are just so dang good at search. I'm going to try Ecosia as others have suggested. I really don't like how friendly Google is with the US government. Get one huge powerful entity in bed with another and nothing good will come of it. Maybe we should list alternatives to Google.
A list of big IT Corps not in bed with the gov? Don't forget most of the new players, Google, Facebook etc, became huge under obama in the last 8 years. I remember no one complaining about Google Boss visiting the White House.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3595166/Google-s-extraordinary-access-revealed-White-House-visitor-logs-meeting-meeting-company-execs-Obama-administration-officials.html
https://theintercept.com/2016/04/22/googles-remarkably-close-relationship-with-the-obama-white-house-in-two-charts/
This thread is focusing on Google but it applies to all of them. No escape.
It was the Obama administration that woke me up from my slumber and got me watching these things. It's when I started to realize I wasn't a 'republican' and more of a libertarian... and the Trump administration and more importantly the current republican congress has convinced me of that fact. It feels like we're getting squeezed between huge corporations and an overactive government.
Everything is based on action and reaction. A pendulum of energy. We do not have enough of a perspective to understand the big picture, but there is always a reaction. Why do you think people like us are on a forum about this amazing magic internet money? Why do you think so many people from so many diverse horizons are here? Action and reaction. Some are here for the love, others for the hate of Bitcoin. Think about the timing. The uni party is not going to let that big cheese go. That is why they hate Trump. They hate the common little peasants as much, maybe more. We have to be ready because they will not let us use their platform in 2018 or 2020, the tools Trump used to win.
This is a glimpse of what's to come.
because they've become so big that most of the people rely on their products and with that they have to power to influence and push various propaganda to the masses and people are just too dependent on them with youtube, google as a search engine,... similar to facebook, people just don't want to switch to another platform just because.
I'd love to move away from Google but they are just so dang good at search. I'm going to try Ecosia as others have suggested. I really don't like how friendly Google is with the US government. Get one huge powerful entity in bed with another and nothing good will come of it. Maybe we should list alternatives to Google.
A list of big IT Corps not in bed with the gov? Don't forget most of the new players, Google, Facebook etc, became huge under obama in the last 8 years. I remember no one complaining about Google Boss visiting the White House.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3595166/Google-s-extraordinary-access-revealed-White-House-visitor-logs-meeting-meeting-company-execs-Obama-administration-officials.html
https://theintercept.com/2016/04/22/googles-remarkably-close-relationship-with-the-obama-white-house-in-two-charts/
This thread is focusing on Google but it applies to all of them. No escape.
It was the Obama administration that woke me up from my slumber and got me watching these things. It's when I started to realize I wasn't a 'republican' and more of a libertarian... and the Trump administration and more importantly the current republican congress has convinced me of that fact. It feels like we're getting squeezed between huge corporations and an overactive government.
I'd love to move away from Google but they are just so dang good at search. I'm going to try Ecosia as others have suggested. I really don't like how friendly Google is with the US government. Get one huge powerful entity in bed with another and nothing good will come of it. Maybe we should list alternatives to Google.
A list of big IT Corps not in bed with the gov? Don't forget most of the new players, Google, Facebook etc, became huge under obama in the last 8 years. I remember no one complaining about Google Boss visiting the White House.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3595166/Google-s-extraordinary-access-revealed-White-House-visitor-logs-meeting-meeting-company-execs-Obama-administration-officials.html
https://theintercept.com/2016/04/22/googles-remarkably-close-relationship-with-the-obama-white-house-in-two-charts/
This thread is focusing on Google but it applies to all of them. No escape.
I'd love to move away from Google but they are just so dang good at search. I'm going to try Ecosia as others have suggested. I really don't like how friendly Google is with the US government. Get one huge powerful entity in bed with another and nothing good will come of it. Maybe we should list alternatives to Google.
And Microsoft is not an evil empire? How much they have already ruined the talented studios(especially sorry for Nokia.
Google Fires Viewpoint Diversity Manifesto Author James Damore
They can do anything they want, but i support Google.
Until now Google never forced me to anything. I hope it will continue this way. they are p2p search engine, email, open source map software and what not. you are free to not use anything from Google.
That is really the scariest part Google gives us the full freedom to do everything what we want using their system. That is really scary because behind those will google has been proven a lot of times that they are surveiling its user to everything they do
Google Memo: Fired Employee Speaks Out! | James Damore and Stefan Molyneux
More reactions:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rc12FbvLGNQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agU-mHFcXdw
Jump to: