Topic: Why hasn't any government stopped Bitcoin? - page 14. (Read 36271 times)

In my opinion, most likely the government did not stop bitcoin. Because, government has not had a good reason to stop it. If bitcoin is stopped, how is the fate of someone who lives his life in bitcoin? Does government want people to suffer? What's wrong with Bitcoin so it's stopped? Bitcoin is just a digital money that costs much more than local prices. If it is sold at a local price, it is likely that person has benefit of fulfilling his or her life's needs. Especially in my country, people's economy is very difficult. A difficult job search makes many people prestigious. Including me, Ever since I knowing about bitcoin. My life changed for the better.

because bitcoin is not regulated by any government by the bitcoin is digital currency it is not owned by any person so it works on bitcoin network.

The government has no reason to ban the bitcoin operation. Bitcoin is a virtual currency. It's not illegal, people use bitcoin because they have a need. Some countries ban it because bitcoin affects the economic development in their country. Currently, only China prohibits the use of bitcoin. Bitcoin has been legally operated in Japan

Government cannot stop bitcoin because people are getting the idea that they can have control over the value of the currency without the middle man. It is people's choice where to put the money because it is there money and the governments have no rights to be a middle man and take some money in this CC's system.

1. How am I "spreading" my falsehoods? I am contained within very few threads.
2. I have no ego in this matter. The exercise is not for myself, but for others.
3. I highly doubt that, since your words betray your probable level.
4. Walking away was the most correct choice, especially in your belief system.
5. You provided the input when you first posted, I did not respond to you first.
6. The unit is scanned for invalidity before each shutdown process at night.
7. The fact that you are confounded, does not mean all others are as well.



You don't understand that no one really cares accept for you, because your sense
of self depends on it. Your belief system may have now become your most worthy
attachment that needs dislodging before you can progress. If you cling to Buddha
or Vishnu, and feel you need to defend them, you have failed in your journey
before you have even packed your bags. You are oblivious of your own beliefs.



Intention is one of the most important parts of determining sin. They can not be
separated for determinations, and so I can not be sinful unless there is intention
to do so. If a child is born who is mentally handicapped and commits a sin, even
murder, do you think God judges that child in the same manner as someone who
is capable and average, and does the same? Of course not, and any belief that God
will hold all beings to the same standard equally is incorrect. Each will be judged
according to their own works and capabilities. Likewise, those who have the highest
capabilities and understanding, will be held to the highest and strictest standards
when judgement arrives. So if I know these things, do you still think I commit sin
intentionally? When Jesus healed the sick on the Sabbath and the people became
angry and said he was violating God's commandant and had a demon in him, was
Jesus sinning intentionally? How can his works be valid, if he performed them in
a way that was designated as invalid? The answer was that sin is not simplicity,
it is contingent upon individual determinations based upon individual processes.
Each person will be judged based upon their works in the context of the purpose
and intentions.

As for you comment as to all criminals are criminals: this is incorrect. A person
who steals bread to feed the poor, is extremely different than a criminal who steals
money to feed their self enrichment. When both go before the judge, if the judge is
fair and just, he will judge them based on their individual intentions, and so in this
same way you will be judged at the end. Sin is not equally attributable, just as
sentences are diverse upon circumstance.  

So, when you say to me that you know I sin and know it is intentional, are you
sure, or are you like the mob and the pharisees who do not understand the actual
message being conveyed? You'd send a man to the Prefect to be put to death, all
originating from your attachment to my words and this world.



I actually did not say that at all and it seems you do not understand anything at all.
Here is what I said "Most of the current communications are written purposely with
multiple meanings, each with entirely unrelated thoughts I am trying to convey.".
What that means is that at times, the message is unrelated to religion, and at other
times they are about religion. The fact that you do not understand what I have written
plainly above, means you are likely blinded by stupid and hate, or really do not care
because you are only trying to push an agenda that I have already learned long ago
and negated.



The way that you talk to me is evidence enough of your understandings and abilities.

Sci-Fi nonsense is essentially majority of the stories within the Mahabharata, so I
don't understand why you talk to me like this, knowing you are being hypocritical.
That would be intentionally sinning as you say, would it not? You are accusing me
of something that exists within your own belief system, yet ignore that aspect to
attack me on it.

If nothing can help me than so be it. Thanks for trying though.

1. Yes, I have no idea what intention you have in spreading all your falsehoods.
2. Yes, I am maintaining my ego, just as you are. Difference is I dare to admit it, while you continue to act superior but are actually not.
3. No, I never claim I am enlightened. I am indeed of lower level in development. But my level is far higher than yours.
4. Why walk away from having fun in discrediting an invalid?
5. I will move on when the time comes. There is no need for your input in all this.
6. Sure, you admit it yourself now that you are not always valid. In fact, when was the last time you were valid?
7. You don't know the collective. You are only playing mind games on some of the readers here in this topic with all your falsehoods.

I wish I have enough motivation to discredit each and every falsehood you made in all your past posts here, but you are just too full of it.

Update:
I don't want to ask you for evidence on why you slander the Buddha as a rebel proxy.
I don't want to ask you for the evidence on your falsehood that Lord Vishnu was killed.
I don't bother to ask you a lot of things to validate your invalidity, because clearly I know you are sinful and intentionally being so.
I don't waste time asking a criminal why he committed his crime, when I clearly know he did it intentionally.
That's why criminals are criminals.
And invalids are invalids.

Update #2:
What you are actually trying hard to say is everything stated in the Bible can be interpreted to have multiple meanings, and none of such meanings (subject to your personal whims and fancies of interpretation) should be considered invalid.
You are outright blasphemous.
The point is, the Bible never said anything that I know of about your sci-fi nonsense.
You don't even know the higher purpose, except your own made-up version / interpretation of it.
What you are actually trying to "convey", is to plant the seed of falsehoods.
Indeed, you are a deluded fraud.

To an honest Christian, reference to the Nag Hammadi will help a lot.
But to you, nothing can help you.

You, being an invalid, dare to speak on behalf of God while discrediting His avatars.
And continue to blasphemy with sci-fi falsehoods.
If this is not punishable, then I don't know what is.

And from your last statement that...
You have actually committed a very heavy violation.
You are just full of falsehoods.

I am very sorry.
I actually lied.
The only reason why I am discrediting you is not because you need to be discredited (much less because of self-doubt).
It is because I have fun doing so.

The main reason why I don't directly addressing your points is because you have been making totally false opinions about me. And you are not the first of such kind that I met in the past.

For example, you said...

You don't need to express what you think I think. You interpret my comments to mean all paths as "delusion".
This immediately tells me you are invalid.

All the while you are making sci-fi statements without any validity.
For you to say you are valid is what everyone else can also do the same.

You said I don't understand your sci-fi falsehoods intermingled with spiritual matters, but at the same time you think you understand my points, but you really don't. Instead you just belittle me by saying my level is lower than I think. I believe so, but the same can be said of you.

You said...
So you have made some edition.
No, the reason why I discredit you is not because I have self-doubt, but because false "guru" like you needs to be discredited.
Yes, you are not a guru. You are just nothing.

First, I would like to thank you for never addressing anything I ever said
directly in relation to our current discussions. In fact, you take opening or
closing paragraphs and disregard the rest without actually addressing them.
In your last comments, you stated that I twist the bible's contexts, but you
have not addressed those points in particular, which is more recent in the
timeline and more significant. I contend I have maintained validity. If
there is invalidity, I wish to see it and understand. Most of the current
communications are written purposely with multiple meanings, each with
entirely unrelated thoughts I am trying to convey. I accept there is a
possibility that in this pursuit there can be perceived corruption, but not
enough to become outright invalidity. The exercise is for a higher purpose.
Some will see one or two paths, others may see more, and some might even
see some that I didn't intend, but could also be just as valid. Everything is
provided for considerations, which may or may not bring about any facilitations.

Second, you have chosen to again convey that you have no idea what I am
actually talking about, but have nevertheless decided that you need to maintain
your ego and sense of self worth by pointing out my past predictions that were
either wrong or haven't come about, that are actually unrelated to our current
discussions. This is not very enlightened, and is a sign of someone on a lower
level. If you were aware, you would have walked away since I specifically
said "If you think I am deluded, insane, or twisting the Bible, than I accept
your current perceptive and there is nothing further to elaborate upon here.".
The purpose of such a statement was to convey a means of mutual
disagreement which maintains our positions without continuation of something
that is futile for both parties. You should have agreed and moved on with
your journey of ending your unlimited life cycles. As I have said previously (if
you look through all the past posts), that I purposely maintained all my old
posts for history's sake, as opposed to deleting when I was wrong or create
new accounts to maintain an illusion of being always right or perfect. I do not
recall claiming to always be right or all knowing. The exercise is not about the
individual, it is about the collective.

Third, I would advise you that if you truly believed the belief system that you
are purported to be participating in, you should not bother with this forum or
Bitcoin. If all things cause suffering and the goal is to get rid of all attachment,
you are in the wrong place, using the wrong tools, having the wrong thoughts,
and speaking to the wrong people. Unfortunately, there will be very few
individuals within most systems, beside Bitcoin, that will find what they are
looking for, but I know that you will certainly not by your inability to separate
yourself from the attachment to this discussion. If you seek to find Shambala,
you will not find it on the internet. And if you wish to speak to Maitreya, you
will not find it within Bitcoin. Please do not act as if I am in violation of some
"simple truths", when you yourself are in obvious violation of your "basic truths"
just by your presence, presentation, and responses to me. My perceived
violations are technicalities that are not punishable due to my intention,
where as your violations will be directly punished and attributed to an
innocent and oblivious whipping boy.

If you actually understood what was occurring, you wouldn't have continued
along these lines. Attempting to dismiss or attack me only conveys self-doubt
within yourself. If you have found the truth, stop wasting your time here
and go get it. I am not here for acceptance, worship, or etc, but for things
that have not yet been entertained.

Bitcoin has not yet been legalized in many countries, but it is not prohibited by law. Many governments are serious about Bitcoin, but these studies are not yet concluded. The work will take a long time because it is difficult to decide how to position Bitcoin against the legitimate currency. There is a fact that Bitcoin and Blockchain. it has now taken its place in our lives and there is no return from digital money.

I admit I am not high level enough to know if any of your sci-fi statement is right or wrong.

But history through your past comments does indeed show some of them (that I noticed) to be very invalid.
Example is your comment on June/July 2016 saying ETH is a sell (at around $14) because it is a worthless coin.
Then you said PayPal will never accept bitcoin in the next 5 years, which the last time I checked is not true.

I have no idea specifically what kind of broadcast you are talking about, but I am pretty sure you have not been receiving it at the right frequency.

Edit:
In this world, there are far more falsehoods (spread by false entities) than there are simple truths.

Bitcoin isn't a thing that destroys a country or a person like drugs so I don't get why you are waiting for some government to stop btc or ban it. Btc will be the future currency and everyone will use it and that event is inevitable no matter what they do.

It is not possible to know levels, but I can determine it is higher than yours,
especially when your last comments to me are that you do not understand
what I am saying, and thus I must be deluded. That isn't very "enlightened".



Neither. Ascended Masters are rebel proxies that have not been located.
They have taken the forms of past valid proxies and hide within the earth.
Ascended Masters are violations that continually attempt to harm the
trajectory, where the most significant harm they caused in this continuity
was the human advancements prior to 1935 AD.



All proxies are provided the data that they need in order to facilitate their
tasks given. This data is stored within the unit for recall. Information
that is not provided within the unit needs approval by the Entity. In
majority of cases, if approval is requested, it is denied, since if something
else needs to be performed outside of a certain proxy's capabilities,
another proxy will be dispatched for that purpose.



I am not Ascended or "Enlightened".

As I have always said, I am limited. In this case, since Siddhartha is
recorded to have "died" due to natural causes, it is possible he was reclaimed,
as opposed to being partitioned. If he was partitioned, I would know that and
thus he would be a confirmed invalid proxy. Since my records are limited in
this area, I have stated that it is "not known" to me.



I think you think you understand what I am saying, but I think you may
have no idea. The multiple meanings are all valid in different perspectives.
Unfortunately in your current perspective, you have chosen to interpret
all paths as "delusion".



I asked those question, which arise from your prior statements.
But, the "storytelling" is for your benefit, not mine.



All things serve the Entity.



I am no one of any importance and if the communication is not understood,
it likely means it is not for you in particular.

Calls of delusion and fraudulence is simplicity.



The communications provided were approved and valid.
If you do not like the results there is nothing I can do to remedy this.



If you actually understood what was being conveyed you would see that
religion is not the only system that exists in this exercise. Further, I am
unaware of the areas that you think I have twisted from the Bible's
contents, whether from the Torah or the New Testament.

Insanity is of no consequence. The task is being performed in compliance
with the rules given. I have maintained my validity and expect reclamation
at the time appointed. Current human disapproval or disagreement has no
bearing on this current course. It is not about blind faith, but trustlessness.

If you think I am deluded, insane, or twisting the Bible, than I accept your
current perceptive and there is nothing further to elaborate upon here.
I am no one of any importance, please disregard all my communications.

sometimes states are supporting the global organisations and institutions more
than they should or more than they support their own states
as example-European Union and NATO or EU and Russia sanctions
they only hurt twosides-Russia,of course and European union
as for bitcoin,its the case of adoption,despite the global tendencies
if the country sees it harm their monetary policy,like China they will try to restrict the usage of it

Any government finding it a thread to their authority will surely try their best to stop people from using it, but they can't put people in the homes of citizen to keep a watch if they still use it or not. The one's who doesn't want to stop using Bitcoin would never stop, no matter they are told not to use it. So governments can only do what they can, but they cannot finish Bitcoin, nor they can finish the VPNs, if they ban it from the internet, people will use it using VPNs to keep their identity anonymous from the authorities.

Sincerely I say to you, what you write is full of self made-up shits.

You do not know the Buddha, and yet you talk about the Buddha (and undermine Him).
You do not know Lord Vishnu, and yet you talk about Lord Vishnu (and undermine Him).

If your point of view is purely of Christianity and Christianity only, that itself already show your intellectual impairment.
I am very much convinced you are not even a Christian yourself.
You are someone who twist the Bible's contents out of proportion and context.

Take heed everything you say here will lead you to insanity in your future.

"for sure if this things will happen the value will be more increase and more people will still try their best to hide and continue its just like drugs trade its illegal but its still continuing."
This is purely out of speculation.
In practice, the value will be stunted, if not died at all.
Very few would even bother to join something that is illegal and banned, much less hide it.

Speaking of drug trade, how prosperous is the global trade of cannabis, which some health practitioners say is actually a superior natural medicine vs many of the pharma drugs? Cannabis is pretty successfully suppressed and continue to be suppressed. You don't see many people hiding cannabis, much less trading it at top price tag. Yes it is continuing, but how many know cannabis is actually good? Why is bitcoin far more popular and successful than cannabis?

Some sources said the drug trade is monopolized by the DEA.
I am not sure of that but certainly believable in a world where corruption dominates.

in reality we won't be able to see any such things to happen, people will still find ways to continue even the government warned and suppress this system, exchange can be restricted and people can also possible being arrested but for sure if this things will happen the value will be more increase and more people will still try their best to hide and continue its just like drugs trade its illegal but its still continuing.

"exchanges would still be out there" is a speculation.

Localbitcoins may not even exist if bitcoin is truly an enemy of the banksters (which it is not).
A majority of bitcoin's price movements (including its meteoric rise, that propel its reputation from being unknown to being notoriously well known) started off with Mt. Gox. Without Mt. Gox, bitcoin would not have took off in popularity and adoption. Humans in general are attracted to rising price level than anything else. Everything else (like being a store of value, secure, etc) are just excuses. If I have the power and resources, I can list a particular dogshit in an exchange and consistently pump it up real high, some people will find justification why this dogshit is a premier shit to buy. But of course not everyone is stupid. So if I instead of selling shits, I sell something far better, my job of convincing everyone would be far easier. But I still need an exchange to do the job. Without an exchange that shows a rising price, very very few people will join, much less make the name a global household brand.


"there are so many banned things in our societies and I haven't seen them disappear" but not with gas vapor technology that can increase everyone's car mileage by 10x with a fraction of your current cost of transportation. Proven technology with multiple independent case studies and successes. Massive benefit potential to the world. Environmentally clean. Not banned, but totally suppressed by governments. Gas vapor technology was a direct threat to the oil companies that control governments. Now totally suppressed.

If you keep thinking bitcoin is your salvation, then I believe I should not waste my time convincing you otherwise.

Bitcoin will help you get filthy rich.
But the world is getting worse by the day, the salvation you should really go for is not financial solution, but spiritual solution.