Topic: Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin - page 30. (Read 43236 times)

Thank you for your respons! I like the fact that you are trying to proffesionalize your exchange and encourage you to raise these standards in retrospective. Much appreciated

If your whole reasoning is "they could possibly change the way the coin works in the future", then why list any coin at all? Every coin can hard fork to a completely new algo/PoW system/stake %/total # of coins/whatever at any time, and if you're afraid of that possibility you might as well de-list every coin right now and shut down your exchange.

In any event, the code/daemon was not ready for the exchange.

Fix the code, submit it again, then it may make it. Obviously, it didn't have any actual support if it dumped. Obviously, that supporting price was a false illusion. Does that when people buy and sell their own coins to make it look like volume is high. Sell the same coin 100 times, it looks like 100 units of volume. Reality was, it was 1 unit of volume, which cost a small fraction in trade-fees, to make it look 100x bigger than it actually was.

Seems we need to have a "Formula", which is locked within the GENESIS-BLOCK-SEED, so it can't be altered and can easily be identified. Even if only a representation, like hard-coding the MAX-BLOCK-COINS and MAX-STAKE-COINS, or other limits. (Even if unlimited. For those coins without limits.)

Then it will not matter what code is used, as long as it fits within the hard-coded limits, which have to check against the GENESIS-BLOCK-SEED. (That only requires "digging for a genesis block seed", with a corresponding value.)

However, the old trick of just generating a "valid" seed, would no-longer be acceptable, since it has to be valid, and with a specific corresponding output comparison.

In any event, that code is essentially useless, if it is beyond the range of possible coins. Like 0.00000000 isn't even possible anyways. While checking to see if it is below 150,000,000 when the max total will only be 50,000,000 is equally as redundantly stupid. The only reason for it, would be so someone can do a massive double-spend attack, or other block-altering, which will not harm the network as a whole, just those who are on the same altered chain as them. Which, the program we ALL USE would say... Sure, a spend of 100,000,000 is OK, it's under 150,000,000.

However, I would review some of the other coins now, for that same issue. Time for someone to update their instant-auto-coin-maker programs.

P.S. The price of SUPER was falling before they said anything. You are getting mad because the crash just happened to continue, after the news. (News which few people read. Not that moving a coin to another exchange actually adds value, it decreases it anyways. You expose it to more people who want to dump.) Don't get your causality construed.

We have recently raised our reviewing standards to look for more than just trojans and security exploits. SC and CINNI were not subjected to that kind of scrutiny. We will investigate them, though. And if it turns out that they are like SuperCoin and deliberately inserted those values, then we might have a problem. I cannot comment on them at this point, since we have not looked over the code yet for things like this.

We are attempting to raise the bar on the quality of the coins we list. We are well aware that this stance will be met with some opposition, particularly when a popular coin is rejected, but we are willing to take the heat for that. The idle pursuit of volume was never the intention behind Poloniex.

@busoni,

did you review codes for all those scam coins listed on Poloniex?

That piece of running code is harmless and didn't/doesn't cause any extra coins. (even busoni said so)
It's something that actually doesn't make any difference to the actual coin supply by itself.
Everyone can make a mistake and supercoin dev most likely forgot to update it.

We'll see. AFAIK,. the supercoin dev is asleep right now.

I like how busoni got called out on all of his points and ridiculed, then stopped responding completely.

You know Spoetnik, every time I read one of your posts I wonder if you are compensating for something you dare not admit to yourself in your private life.......

People who hold supercoin are crying like babies, grow up and accept the truth. No one knows intetions of Supercoin dev but he did something wrong and all should accept that.

busoni

Please add Supercoin on Poloniex.

thank you very much.

but he's not.. what you just said is not true.
for one thing the exchange can pick and choose what ever coins they want to add.. they are not obligated to add any of them.
so how can he be wrong on that point ?
and on the other major point.. what he said is verified .. i checked it myself and he is 100% dead on about it.
It's been explained..
so i have no choice but to believe you and others are lying and playing games now to cover up the truth.
And the truth is he found a contradiction that looks fishy.
And that IS the truth.

if i have to choose one or the other to believe i believe Poloniex staff not the anon cloner..
and i can tell you all i too have no Super coins etc and if i did i would still say the same thing anyway.. truth is truth .
Suck it up..
for the good of our scene please lol
Quit being lying manipulative game playing scammers invested scam coins defending them.. you make ALL of us look bad  

meanwile... at poloniex

it seems there are some misunderstanding on Supercoin total amount, the old total amount is like you said,

but Supercoin do make a hard fork several days ago.


please check this:


thank you very much busoni, i like Poloniex, and i do want supercoin be lised in Poloniex.

Please think this again.

much appreciated!

Can you explain how he can claim something while the running code tells different ?

The code in the bitcoinrpc.cpp busoni posted

Line 99


Why change MAX_MONEY and hardcode when
it's set in the main.h file?

https://github.com/supercoinproject/supercoin/blob/master/src/main.h#L38

Welp I'm done with poloniex

Bittrex and mintpal all the way for now on

Seems poloniex will be busy going through every coin they have listed now as they'll need to de-list a LOT.

?? care to comment busoni

Well Done,
I'm loving seeing Ethic,s over profits
Poloniex just Raised the bar again.
 

I'm not affiliated with SUPER in any way and have never bought or mined SUPER, I just thought people should know how completely and utterly wrong Poloniex is here.