Pages:
Author

Topic: Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin - page 31. (Read 43236 times)

full member
Activity: 204
Merit: 100
June 14, 2014, 06:10:55 PM
#71

lol
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
June 14, 2014, 06:10:28 PM
#70
diversion tactics won't work guys  Roll Eyes

classic.. YOU get caught so you attempt to discredit the guy that caught you.
Oh internet your so creative ahahha
Do you guys think you just invented the cover up technique or something ?

yeah.. bam.... puuuuuhleeeeze lol
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
June 14, 2014, 06:10:24 PM
#69


TBH, this guy doesn't help your cause.
sr. member
Activity: 273
Merit: 250
June 14, 2014, 06:08:59 PM
#68
Let's take a look at some other popular coins on Poloniex:

Silkcoin
Maximum POW supply: ~45 million

Great, let's check the code:

Code:
static const int64_t MAX_MONEY = 2000000000 * COIN;

Uh oh, 2 billion is a lot more than 45 million! Better de-list SC right away!

Cinni
Total Coins: 15,000,000

Hmm...

Code:
static const int64 MAX_MONEY = 100000000 * COIN;

I'm not very good at math but I think 100 million may be slightly more than 15 million.

Strange that you never gave a shit about things like this before?

BAM!

Silkcoin and CINNI are scams !!

EDIT : soory, i can't resist
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
June 14, 2014, 06:05:15 PM
#67
Let's take a look at some other popular coins on Poloniex:

Silkcoin
Maximum POW supply: ~45 million

Great, let's check the code:

Code:
static const int64_t MAX_MONEY = 2000000000 * COIN;

Uh oh, 2 billion is a lot more than 45 million! Better de-list SC right away!

Cinni
Total Coins: 15,000,000

Hmm...

Code:
static const int64 MAX_MONEY = 100000000 * COIN;

I'm not very good at math but I think 100 million may be slightly more than 15 million.

Strange that you never gave a shit about things like this before?

BAM!
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
June 14, 2014, 06:05:08 PM
#66
thanks for the warning busoni and its your job to check coins before adding, Great work.
sr. member
Activity: 458
Merit: 265
June 14, 2014, 06:04:47 PM
#65
Here is the updated specs after hard fork.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7273647

Here is the dev stating that it's now 1/3 of the old plan.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7266883

To me, it's just them forgetting to change it. Code checked out by multiple people now.

@busoni, you should have consulted with the dev first as you obviously didn't even know about the hard fork.

aka: the cover up damage control campaign.

you can't say one thing and do another and get caught then make excuses.

what OP said is dead on 100% accurate and it LOOKS bad !

the smoking gun is the coin it was cloned from did not use that large value.. so they can NOT claim it was left over code.
they are caught red handed setting that value that contradicts the official coin specs..

and hey guess what mouthy idiots..

it's his fucking job to go and check what the official coin specs are and verify them in the source code !
more than many exchanges usually do lol

I applaud him ..good job !
Wow, a rational post. Thank you.
sr. member
Activity: 371
Merit: 250
June 14, 2014, 06:03:51 PM
#64
Let's take a look at some other popular coins on Poloniex:

Silkcoin
Maximum POW supply: ~45 million

Great, let's check the code:

Code:
static const int64_t MAX_MONEY = 2000000000 * COIN;

Uh oh, 2 billion is a lot more than 45 million! Better de-list SC right away!

Cinni
Total Coins: 15,000,000

Hmm...

Code:
static const int64 MAX_MONEY = 100000000 * COIN;

I'm not very good at math but I think 100 million may be slightly more than 15 million.

Strange that you never gave a shit about things like this before?
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
June 14, 2014, 06:03:16 PM
#63
Here is the updated specs after hard fork.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7273647

Here is the dev stating that it's now 1/3 of the old plan.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7266883

To me, it's just them forgetting to change it. Code checked out by multiple people now.

@busoni, you should have consulted with the dev first as you obviously didn't even know about the hard fork.

aka: the cover up damage control campaign.

you can't say one thing and do another and get caught then make excuses.

what OP said is dead on 100% accurate and it LOOKS bad !

the smoking gun is the coin it was cloned from did not use that large value.. so they can NOT claim it was left over code.
they are caught red handed setting that value that contradicts the official coin specs..

and hey guess what mouthy idiots..

it's his fucking job to go and check what the official coin specs are and verify them in the source code !
more than many exchanges usually do lol

I applaud him ..good job !
legendary
Activity: 1588
Merit: 1000
June 14, 2014, 06:00:30 PM
#62
the expansion of the Max_Coins variable *could easily be for a setup for a multi-staged plan.
think about it.. what if you wanted to release a coin with clean source then gradually implement a cheat ?
the best way to do it would be to integrate some changes on various updates bit by bit..

start with clean source then make an update with *part of the cheat added.
such as what is pointed out here in this topic.. expanding the max coins variable so its far greater than what is publicly announced..
then what ?
And you may think what good will that do ?
Obfuscation that is what..
Many people compare these source codes by comparing two whole folders of code and any line of code that has been changed will show up highlighted.
So if the change is setup in advance it will NOT show up in the last folder comparison..
it's a tricky and devious method to slip in malicious code and that *could have been what happened here.. i don't know.
Hard to know what coin cloners intentions are around this scene but lets not forget it's riddled with corruption by thieves and scammers.
This fact can not be ignored.. it's the nature of our game.

I was going to look at Honor Coins source code to see if that specific part of the code was copied untouched..
If so it may have simply been an honest mistake in coin cloning lol
If the code base Super coin was cloned from did not have the same value / code on line 100 then i would bet anything the Super coin poster is scamming.

Reality is it does not look good.
And if something does not look good then something does not look good.. it's just how it is.

Another noble public service by the crack PoloniEx team...
Now if they could only do something about the captchas.
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1011
jakiman is back!
June 14, 2014, 05:59:29 PM
#61
Here is the updated specs after hard fork.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7273647

Here is the dev stating that it's now 1/3 of the old plan.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7266883

To me, it's just them forgetting to change it. Code checked out by multiple people now.

@busoni, you should have consulted with the dev first as you obviously didn't even know about the hard fork.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
June 14, 2014, 05:59:16 PM
#60
You guys realize that before the recent fork of SUPER, it was supposed to be 150million total coin supply?

They might have forgot to change this number down to 50 million that it should be now.

Poloniex should not have jumped the gun with this when PoW ends in 73 days from now and PoW checks out clean according to CryptoCobain.

This was cloned from Honorcoin. It even used Honorcoin's stake checkpoint.

So now you're changing your reasoning, and saying it won't be added because it's a clone of some other coin? Most of coins are clones of other coins, just with features added. All scryptcoins are clones of litecoin. This is damage control that you are doing right now. Please stop spreading more FUD, admit your mistakes, and delete this thread.

Did I say I'm not listing it because it was cloned?

jakiman said that the value may have been leftover from the old SUPER coin. I am saying that is not very likely, because this coin was cloned from Honorcoin, not the old SUPER coin. See bitcoinrpc.cpp of Honorcoin and (new) SuperCoin side by side: http://www.diffchecker.com/j8xl540o

I'd say that is a smoking gun.. Super coin is looking seriously scammy.
I tried to get the Honorcoin Source code right now from Github but it's long gone..

Guys don't be greedy fools.. it looks like this guy was caught red handed setting you up for a scam big time and your all making dumb excuses for the scammer.
i guess you invested in a scam coin and ow your going to defend it the bitter scammy end eh ? lol
wow i'm soooo surprised  Roll Eyes

So far i used Beyond Compare to do some check and i also loaded up Visual studio and created a blank project
then i took the search string "AmountFromValue" which is the function name of the suspicious spot of code..
then i used search to find all calls to that function.. still looking Wink
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 503
Bitcoin King BTC
June 14, 2014, 05:52:13 PM
#59
they never said they found hidden coins, idiots

they said they found in the source theres room for 150 mil coins, thats the scam idiots, there will be more then 50 mil coins, 150 mil, there just not here yet,

is it that hard to read??
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
June 14, 2014, 05:50:11 PM
#58
oooooops



Sounds like a little cya....
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
June 14, 2014, 05:49:41 PM
#57
the expansion of the Max_Coins variable *could easily be for a setup for a multi-staged plan.
think about it.. what if you wanted to release a coin with clean source then gradually implement a cheat ?
the best way to do it would be to integrate some changes on various updates bit by bit..

start with clean source then make an update with *part of the cheat added.
such as what is pointed out here in this topic.. expanding the max coins variable so its far greater than what is publicly announced..
then what ?
And you may think what good will that do ?
Obfuscation that is what..
Many people compare these source codes by comparing two whole folders of code and any line of code that has been changed will show up highlighted.
So if the change is setup in advance it will NOT show up in the last folder comparison..
it's a tricky and devious method to slip in malicious code and that *could have been what happened here.. i don't know.
Hard to know what coin cloners intentions are around this scene but lets not forget it's riddled with corruption by thieves and scammers.
This fact can not be ignored.. it's the nature of our game.

I was going to look at Honor Coins source code to see if that specific part of the code was copied untouched..
If so it may have simply been an honest mistake in coin cloning lol
If the code base Super coin was cloned from did not have the same value / code on line 100 then i would bet anything the Super coin poster is scamming.

Reality is it does not look good.
And if something does not look good then something does not look good.. it's just how it is.
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 520
June 14, 2014, 05:49:32 PM
#56
You guys realize that before the recent fork of SUPER, it was supposed to be 150million total coin supply?

They might have forgot to change this number down to 50 million that it should be now.

Poloniex should not have jumped the gun with this when PoW ends in 73 days from now and PoW checks out clean according to CryptoCobain.

This was cloned from Honorcoin. It even used Honorcoin's stake checkpoint.

So now you're changing your reasoning, and saying it won't be added because it's a clone of some other coin? Most of coins are clones of other coins, just with features added. All scryptcoins are clones of litecoin. This is damage control that you are doing right now. Please stop spreading more FUD, admit your mistakes, and delete this thread.

Did I say I'm not listing it because it was cloned?

jakiman said that the value may have been leftover from the old SUPER coin. I am saying that is not very likely, because this coin was cloned from Honorcoin, not the old SUPER coin. See bitcoinrpc.cpp of Honorcoin and (new) SuperCoin side by side: http://www.diffchecker.com/j8xl540o

stop the excuses now Mr. ridiculous. say sorry for ur mistakes or GTFO
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
June 14, 2014, 05:49:16 PM
#55
I do thank Poloniex for the cheap coins though...just made 2BTC on this FUD!

Yup so far im up about the same for all the fudders panic dumping. Thanks!!!!
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
Owner of Poloniex
June 14, 2014, 05:48:36 PM
#54
You guys realize that before the recent fork of SUPER, it was supposed to be 150million total coin supply?

They might have forgot to change this number down to 50 million that it should be now.

Poloniex should not have jumped the gun with this when PoW ends in 73 days from now and PoW checks out clean according to CryptoCobain.

This was cloned from Honorcoin. It even used Honorcoin's stake checkpoint.

So now you're changing your reasoning, and saying it won't be added because it's a clone of some other coin? Most of coins are clones of other coins, just with features added. All scryptcoins are clones of litecoin. This is damage control that you are doing right now. Please stop spreading more FUD, admit your mistakes, and delete this thread.

Did I say I'm not listing it because it was cloned?

jakiman said that the value may have been leftover from the old SUPER coin. I am saying that is not very likely, because this coin was cloned from Honorcoin, not the old SUPER coin. See bitcoinrpc.cpp of Honorcoin and (new) SuperCoin side by side: http://www.diffchecker.com/j8xl540o
full member
Activity: 204
Merit: 100
June 14, 2014, 05:47:18 PM
#53
I do thank Poloniex for the cheap coins though...just made 2BTC on this FUD!
Nice, I had to sell at loss because of panic dumping. Rebought at 2k, so i'm not complaining :^)
sr. member
Activity: 371
Merit: 250
June 14, 2014, 05:45:37 PM
#52
RIP Polo you had a good run.
Pages:
Jump to: