Pages:
Author

Topic: Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin - page 33. (Read 43236 times)

member
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
June 14, 2014, 05:13:14 PM
#31
MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.

That's retarded. How the fuck are you able to run an exchange, if you can't even figure out the basics?
MAX_MONEY doesn't indicate maximum supply, it's a check value for transaction validity.

MAX_MONEY itself doesn't provide extra coins, but it means they could be inserted into the blockchain and the network would consider them valid. This would be even easier to do using the "trustless" anon system.

What the fuck are you talking about? How would those "extra coins" be generated? You clearly have no idea how cryptocurrencies function.

The most likely way would be for them to push an update to adjust the reward. As I said, we did not find evidence of a hidden premine currently in existence. What legitimate explanation for this obviously deliberate adjustment to the variables do you have?


Right on , respect

I don't agree with you busoni. I believe there is a concern but PoW is legit in their code. Also MAX_MONEY can be changed on any update on any coin which makes this argument invalid. Currently the coin will produce the correct amount of coins. This is FUD
full member
Activity: 204
Merit: 100
June 14, 2014, 05:10:35 PM
#30
MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.

That's retarded. How the fuck are you able to run an exchange, if you can't even figure out the basics?
MAX_MONEY doesn't indicate maximum supply, it's a check value for transaction validity.

MAX_MONEY itself doesn't provide extra coins, but it means they could be inserted into the blockchain and the network would consider them valid. This would be even easier to do using the "trustless" anon system.

What the fuck are you talking about? How would those "extra coins" be generated? You clearly have no idea how cryptocurrencies function.

The most likely way would be for them to push an update to adjust the reward. As I said, we did not find evidence of a hidden premine currently in existence. What legitimate explanation for this obviously deliberate adjustment to the variables do you have?
If they were going to push an update to change block reward, they could change MAX_MONEY in the same update. Also i'm pretty sure that would require a hardfork. You are spreading FUD.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
June 14, 2014, 05:10:27 PM
#29
busoni thank you... for the cheap coins  Smiley supercoin dev probably gonna be furious when he wakes up
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 520
June 14, 2014, 05:08:55 PM
#28
Busoni Tristan the shitcoin terminator. Nice show killing price without good reason lol

Anyhow i hate poloniex hard ever since u stole my BTC u asshole
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
Owner of Poloniex
June 14, 2014, 05:08:16 PM
#27
Question:
What that line means: if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > 150000000.0)

That's a range check, it means if dAmount is below 0 or over 150,000,000. Or to put it differently if dAmount is not between 0.00000001 and 150,000,000 then do whatever is in the code block that follows.

Yes, that's a range check for returning the error "Invalid amount." The purpose of including that is to show that the 150 Million number was typed explicitly in two different places. Coins typically use the MAX_MONEY variable there.
sr. member
Activity: 245
Merit: 250
June 14, 2014, 05:07:11 PM
#26
MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.

That's retarded. How the fuck are you able to run an exchange, if you can't even figure out the basics?
MAX_MONEY doesn't indicate maximum supply, it's a check value for transaction validity.

MAX_MONEY itself doesn't provide extra coins, but it means they could be inserted into the blockchain and the network would consider them valid. This would be even easier to do using the "trustless" anon system.

What the fuck are you talking about? How would those "extra coins" be generated? You clearly have no idea how cryptocurrencies function.

The most likely way would be for them to push an update to adjust the reward. As I said, we did not find evidence of a hidden premine currently in existence. What legitimate explanation for this obviously deliberate adjustment to the variables do you have?

busoni, thank you for doing code reviews like this, but did you give the Super coin team a chance to respond to your findings?
full member
Activity: 230
Merit: 100
June 14, 2014, 05:06:16 PM
#25
Question:
What that line means: if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > 150000000.0)

That's a range check, it means if dAmount is below 0 or over 150,000,000. Or to put it differently if dAmount is not between 0.00000001 and 150,000,000 then do whatever is in the code block that follows.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
June 14, 2014, 05:05:05 PM
#24
MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.

That's retarded. How the fuck are you able to run an exchange, if you can't even figure out the basics?
MAX_MONEY doesn't indicate maximum supply, it's a check value for transaction validity.

MAX_MONEY itself doesn't provide extra coins, but it means they could be inserted into the blockchain and the network would consider them valid. This would be even easier to do using the "trustless" anon system.

What the fuck are you talking about? How would those "extra coins" be generated? You clearly have no idea how cryptocurrencies function.

The most likely way would be for them to push an update to adjust the reward. As I said, we did not find evidence of a hidden premine currently in existence. What legitimate explanation for this obviously deliberate adjustment to the variables do you have?


Right on , respect
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
Owner of Poloniex
June 14, 2014, 05:03:54 PM
#23
MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.

That's retarded. How the fuck are you able to run an exchange, if you can't even figure out the basics?
MAX_MONEY doesn't indicate maximum supply, it's a check value for transaction validity.

MAX_MONEY itself doesn't provide extra coins, but it means they could be inserted into the blockchain and the network would consider them valid. This would be even easier to do using the "trustless" anon system.

What the fuck are you talking about? How would those "extra coins" be generated? You clearly have no idea how cryptocurrencies function.

The most likely way would be for them to push an update to adjust the reward. As I said, we did not find evidence of a hidden premine currently in existence. What legitimate explanation for this obviously deliberate adjustment to the variables do you have?
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
June 14, 2014, 05:03:31 PM
#22
I wonder if Polo will give refunds to all the people that panic sold based on their faulty FUD.

Seriously.
Talk about legally sticking your neck out..
Not a wise idea.
Just say you are not listing it, don't need to explain why.
 Angry
Huh
The code speaks for its self. Critique is not slander. I am happy someone is looking out for the rest of us cryptonauts.
2fa
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
June 14, 2014, 05:03:21 PM
#21
Hmm, maybe supercoin is superscam.
sr. member
Activity: 403
Merit: 250
June 14, 2014, 05:02:26 PM
#20
Question:
What that line means: if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > 150000000.0)
full member
Activity: 204
Merit: 100
June 14, 2014, 05:00:19 PM
#19
MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.

That's retarded. How the fuck are you able to run an exchange, if you can't even figure out the basics?
MAX_MONEY doesn't indicate maximum supply, it's a check value for transaction validity.

What does indicate maximum supply in the code?
blockreward
legendary
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
June 14, 2014, 05:00:06 PM
#18
Nice find.
full member
Activity: 204
Merit: 100
June 14, 2014, 04:59:27 PM
#17
MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.

That's retarded. How the fuck are you able to run an exchange, if you can't even figure out the basics?
MAX_MONEY doesn't indicate maximum supply, it's a check value for transaction validity.

MAX_MONEY itself doesn't provide extra coins, but it means they could be inserted into the blockchain and the network would consider them valid. This would be even easier to do using the "trustless" anon system.

What the fuck are you talking about? How would those "extra coins" be generated? You clearly have no idea how cryptocurrencies function.
sr. member
Activity: 445
Merit: 255
June 14, 2014, 04:58:21 PM
#16
MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.

That's retarded. How the fuck are you able to run an exchange, if you can't even figure out the basics?
MAX_MONEY doesn't indicate maximum supply, it's a check value for transaction validity.

In the asiacoin hidden premine, I believe these constants were used to trick the blockchain explorer et the wallet code which give the total number of coins.
member
Activity: 308
Merit: 10
Bitcoin is the future
June 14, 2014, 04:57:50 PM
#15
MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.

That's retarded. How the fuck are you able to run an exchange, if you can't even figure out the basics?
MAX_MONEY doesn't indicate maximum supply, it's a check value for transaction validity.

What does indicate maximum supply in the code?
sr. member
Activity: 300
Merit: 250
June 14, 2014, 04:57:14 PM
#14
citing max supply is not enough to prove that coin is scam. More careful investigation needed in source code.

(i'm not trying to defend Super here because i don't own any of that shitcoin Smiley)
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
Owner of Poloniex
June 14, 2014, 04:55:36 PM
#13
MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.

That's retarded. How the fuck are you able to run an exchange, if you can't even figure out the basics?
MAX_MONEY doesn't indicate maximum supply, it's a check value for transaction validity.

MAX_MONEY itself doesn't provide extra coins, but it means they could be inserted into the blockchain and the network would consider them valid. This would be even easier to do using the "trustless" anon system.
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
June 14, 2014, 04:54:50 PM
#12
Thank you Poloniex team, due diligence like this is what is taking crypto to the next level.

  poloniex.com was the first site I ever traded on, and it's the easiest and most user friendly site I have found to date.

    The hard work put into poloniex.com is evident throughout the site.
Pages:
Jump to: