Topic: Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin - page 33. (Read 43236 times)

MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.

That's retarded. How the fuck are you able to run an exchange, if you can't even figure out the basics?
MAX_MONEY doesn't indicate maximum supply, it's a check value for transaction validity.

MAX_MONEY itself doesn't provide extra coins, but it means they could be inserted into the blockchain and the network would consider them valid. This would be even easier to do using the "trustless" anon system.

What the fuck are you talking about? How would those "extra coins" be generated? You clearly have no idea how cryptocurrencies function.

The most likely way would be for them to push an update to adjust the reward. As I said, we did not find evidence of a hidden premine currently in existence. What legitimate explanation for this obviously deliberate adjustment to the variables do you have?

Right on , respect

I don't agree with you busoni. I believe there is a concern but PoW is legit in their code. Also MAX_MONEY can be changed on any update on any coin which makes this argument invalid. Currently the coin will produce the correct amount of coins. This is FUD

Swag

full member

Activity: 204

Merit: 100

Quote from: greatwolf on June 14, 2014, 04:06:16 PM

MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.

That's retarded. How the fuck are you able to run an exchange, if you can't even figure out the basics?
MAX_MONEY doesn't indicate maximum supply, it's a check value for transaction validity.

MAX_MONEY itself doesn't provide extra coins, but it means they could be inserted into the blockchain and the network would consider them valid. This would be even easier to do using the "trustless" anon system.

What the fuck are you talking about? How would those "extra coins" be generated? You clearly have no idea how cryptocurrencies function.

The most likely way would be for them to push an update to adjust the reward. As I said, we did not find evidence of a hidden premine currently in existence. What legitimate explanation for this obviously deliberate adjustment to the variables do you have?

If they were going to push an update to change block reward, they could change MAX_MONEY in the same update. Also i'm pretty sure that would require a hardfork. You are spreading FUD.

MinerP

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

busoni thank you... for the cheap coins

supercoin dev probably gonna be furious when he wakes up

From Above

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 520

Busoni Tristan the shitcoin terminator. Nice show killing price without good reason lol

Anyhow i hate poloniex hard ever since u stole my BTC u asshole

busoni

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

Owner of Poloniex

Quote from: sesko on June 14, 2014, 04:02:26 PM

Question:
What that line means: if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > 150000000.0)

That's a range check, it means if dAmount is below 0 or over 150,000,000. Or to put it differently if dAmount is not between 0.00000001 and 150,000,000 then do whatever is in the code block that follows.

Yes, that's a range check for returning the error "Invalid amount." The purpose of including that is to show that the 150 Million number was typed explicitly in two different places. Coins typically use the MAX_MONEY variable there.

purplejaguar

sr. member

Activity: 245

Merit: 250

Quote from: sesko on June 14, 2014, 04:02:26 PM

MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.

That's retarded. How the fuck are you able to run an exchange, if you can't even figure out the basics?
MAX_MONEY doesn't indicate maximum supply, it's a check value for transaction validity.

MAX_MONEY itself doesn't provide extra coins, but it means they could be inserted into the blockchain and the network would consider them valid. This would be even easier to do using the "trustless" anon system.

What the fuck are you talking about? How would those "extra coins" be generated? You clearly have no idea how cryptocurrencies function.

The most likely way would be for them to push an update to adjust the reward. As I said, we did not find evidence of a hidden premine currently in existence. What legitimate explanation for this obviously deliberate adjustment to the variables do you have?

busoni, thank you for doing code reviews like this, but did you give the Super coin team a chance to respond to your findings?

greatwolf

full member

Activity: 230

Merit: 100

Question:
What that line means: if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > 150000000.0)

That's a range check, it means if dAmount is below 0 or over 150,000,000. Or to put it differently if dAmount is not between 0.00000001 and 150,000,000 then do whatever is in the code block that follows.

whatdidshedo

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.

That's retarded. How the fuck are you able to run an exchange, if you can't even figure out the basics?
MAX_MONEY doesn't indicate maximum supply, it's a check value for transaction validity.

MAX_MONEY itself doesn't provide extra coins, but it means they could be inserted into the blockchain and the network would consider them valid. This would be even easier to do using the "trustless" anon system.

What the fuck are you talking about? How would those "extra coins" be generated? You clearly have no idea how cryptocurrencies function.

The most likely way would be for them to push an update to adjust the reward. As I said, we did not find evidence of a hidden premine currently in existence. What legitimate explanation for this obviously deliberate adjustment to the variables do you have?

Right on , respect

busoni

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

Owner of Poloniex

Quote from: burstceo on June 14, 2014, 03:54:31 PM

MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.

That's retarded. How the fuck are you able to run an exchange, if you can't even figure out the basics?
MAX_MONEY doesn't indicate maximum supply, it's a check value for transaction validity.

MAX_MONEY itself doesn't provide extra coins, but it means they could be inserted into the blockchain and the network would consider them valid. This would be even easier to do using the "trustless" anon system.

What the fuck are you talking about? How would those "extra coins" be generated? You clearly have no idea how cryptocurrencies function.

The most likely way would be for them to push an update to adjust the reward. As I said, we did not find evidence of a hidden premine currently in existence. What legitimate explanation for this obviously deliberate adjustment to the variables do you have?

godofdefire

newbie

Activity: 6

Merit: 0

Quote from: UNO_owner on June 14, 2014, 03:53:16 PM

I wonder if Polo will give refunds to all the people that panic sold based on their faulty FUD.

Seriously.
Talk about legally sticking your neck out..
Not a wise idea.
Just say you are not listing it, don't need to explain why.
Angry

The code speaks for its self. Critique is not slander. I am happy someone is looking out for the rest of us cryptonauts.

2fa

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

Hmm, maybe supercoin is superscam.

sesko

sr. member

Activity: 403

Merit: 250

Question:
What that line means: if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > 150000000.0)

Swag

full member

Activity: 204

Merit: 100

Quote from: old fart on June 14, 2014, 03:57:50 PM

MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.

That's retarded. How the fuck are you able to run an exchange, if you can't even figure out the basics?
MAX_MONEY doesn't indicate maximum supply, it's a check value for transaction validity.

What does indicate maximum supply in the code?

blockreward

fredeq

legendary

Activity: 1537

Merit: 1005

Nice find.

Swag

full member

Activity: 204

Merit: 100

MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.

That's retarded. How the fuck are you able to run an exchange, if you can't even figure out the basics?
MAX_MONEY doesn't indicate maximum supply, it's a check value for transaction validity.

MAX_MONEY itself doesn't provide extra coins, but it means they could be inserted into the blockchain and the network would consider them valid. This would be even easier to do using the "trustless" anon system.

What the fuck are you talking about? How would those "extra coins" be generated? You clearly have no idea how cryptocurrencies function.

ol92

sr. member

Activity: 445

Merit: 255

MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.

That's retarded. How the fuck are you able to run an exchange, if you can't even figure out the basics?
MAX_MONEY doesn't indicate maximum supply, it's a check value for transaction validity.

In the asiacoin hidden premine, I believe these constants were used to trick the blockchain explorer et the wallet code which give the total number of coins.

old fart

member

Activity: 308

Merit: 10

Bitcoin is the future

MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.

That's retarded. How the fuck are you able to run an exchange, if you can't even figure out the basics?
MAX_MONEY doesn't indicate maximum supply, it's a check value for transaction validity.

What does indicate maximum supply in the code?

uvt9

sr. member

Activity: 300

Merit: 250

citing max supply is not enough to prove that coin is scam. More careful investigation needed in source code.

(i'm not trying to defend Super here because i don't own any of that shitcoin

)

busoni

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

Owner of Poloniex