As i can see, not many people are read the whole topic. I suggest everyone to read all replies before posting your reply.
You're just trolling, right? Your posting does not make any sense whatsoever otherwise.
If you don't agree, then make your words more argumented. I'm tired of people that just saying
"nonsense" to anyone they don't agree. Look how my posting is structured and argumented. If you think that my arguments are
"nonsense", then prove it, aswell as I'm trying to prove my beliefs.
So, do you have some sort of personal vendetta against bitcoin or something?
I've already told that i have not any personal hate against Bitcoin. I am repeat: read the whole topic.
What what is this "disaster" you are talking about? What makes you think that Ethereum would be able to survive, but not Bitcoin?
I've already told about issues that Bitcoin have, and Ethereum have not, but let me clarify.
Bitcoin became more
centralized due to ASIC mining. China is the leader in the Bitcoin mining industry, the most of Bitcoin's hashing power are centered in China, cause they can produce ASICs cheaply, and electricity is relatively cheap there. By statistics in the Internet, China may have hashing power over 51% of the whole Bitcoin network. That means China can perform 51% attack on Bitcoin network, but currently they don't do that. But how can we trust Chinese government that they will not suddenly consider Bitcoin as the threat of Chinese currency? This is not conspiracy, if China have power to attack Bitcoin, this will be
disaster for it. Cryptocurrency needs to be decentralized, for long-term investment.
I think this issue is the most
dangerous.
Well, I think OP is not really a fan of Bitcoin. All your suggestions and protection towards Bitcoin haven't good for him.
We don't need to argue why we hold Bitcoin or not. OP has already decided what could be the best coin for him and he should keep and trust it. It is not this time we have to see the result and to knows who wins either the Bitcoin holder or ETH holder (OP).
We all are here for a reason and most of us are here for investment. And we are free to choose which one seems to be best and profitable. Because for me, I hold and traded them both.
I've already told: do what you want, this is your money. My purpose is to
share my thoughts with crypto community.
If you ask about what Bitcoin exactly can give? I will say that bitcoin provides us with a chance to make money from the internet because we live to need money, and while people busy making money from their offline, we have another way to make money.
Of course Bitcoin can give money as any other crypto. But by
"what Bitcoin exactly can give?" I mean it's intrinsic value. If Bitcoin have clear disadvantages, like centralization, that will break it in next several years, i suggest to not hold it for too long. The last decision is on you of course.
ETH shares the exact same on-chain problems as Bitcoin. If you think Bitcoin is outdated, then ETH also is. The thing is though, the only solution to their problems is reducing their decentralization levels. If you want them to be super fast and super cheap, then they need to be super centralized as well. You just cannot have all three.
Strange statement, Ethereum not shares
all problems with Bitcoin. Just think a bit, why are there so many cryptocurrencies developed at different times? You really think that they were developed, just so developers can profit from it? You right! But not all crypto were developed for that purpose. Litecoin, Bitcoin cash, Ethereum, Monero, and many others were developed to mitigate drawbacks of Bitcoin, but have their own issues aswell. I think it's not impossible for some cryptocurrency to be decentralized, fast, cheap, and convenient, if developers are trying to improve base ideas of Bitcoin.
ETH is almost as expensive as bitcoin to operate. People who say Bitcoin is very expensive also not using ETH anymore. They use other currencies and they are either very centralized or nobody is using it so there is more room. Litecoin, Bitcoin Cash or Monero will also have the same problems as Bitcoin once more people start using them. (btw BCH is more centralized than the others because of its block size)
Decentralized, fast, cheap.
Pick 2.
You can't have all.
I haven't told that LTC, BCH or XMR are better than BTC, I've mentioned them because, many developers are see deep problems of Bitcoin, and are
trying to solve them.
The main disadvantage of Bitcoin, is that it cannot be changed. Any major changes of source code leads to new cryptocurrency. Ethereum just more flexible, and have gone the difficult way to prove it's value.
Bitcoin can't help organizations and investors get rid of the fear that this is all just a bubble.
Bitcoin is important step to revolution of the whole financial system, but not the last. It exists now, because not many people understand that Bitcoin is relic of the past. Ethereum is much more promising than Bitcoin with it's smart-contracts. HODL Ethereum not Bitcoin, when the disaster comes, Bitcoin won't survive.
There is really something on your head which is not right at all mate. You are thinking completely wrong about the bitcoin. With the advancement of more enthusiasts bitcoin actually has captured more and more investor based attention. On one hand people do think that bitcoin can give rise to decentralised banks and on the other hand it has futuristic use in the share market to inter-country transfers. In this case, sky is not the limit! You never know what amazing usage might just come out if someone really push it hard. The big game!
I really like your enthusiasm, really. But read the whole topic. Decentralized banks are not possible with Bitcoin, cause it's
centralized. If there is cryptocurrency that faster than Bitcoin, more secure, durable and convenient, that crypto may become more important in the near future. And this is not necessary to be Ethereum, I just don't see better, long-term alternative, in case if Bitcoin will totally fall.
Don't be overwhelmed by Bitcoin dominance, in crypto market, changes can happen in the matter of days, you're all know this better than ever.
I don't know how you came about this conclusion but what I can say is that it's totally absurd. If you'll compare Ethereum to Bitcoin, then you'll need to compare their price movement over the years. Look at what bitcoin achieved in its first five years and compare it to that of Ethereum.
Compare the price movement of bitcoin in the last five years to that of Ethereum and determine which has more potential. I don't know why you'd think Ethereum has more potential than bitcoin when Ethereum is still under $2000 and bitcoin has break $50k.
If you however think Ethereum is better than bitcoin, then good for you.
I'm not saying that Ethereum is more
profitable than Bitcoin, I'm trying to say that Bitcoin have problems that will lead it to fall, and Ethereum have enough technical concrete to withstand, and maybe become next dominant.
And one more thing, I'm not saying that Bitcoin will crack right now, I'm saying that it happen in next several years.
I'm not
forcing anyone to beleave me or do like i suggest, we need to talk about anything regarding Bitcoin, to make cryptocurrencies better instrument for investing, trading, and use.